SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

The investigation of the mechnanical properties of structural lightweight concrete produced with pumice and mineral admixtures

Pomza ve mineral katkılı taşıyıcı hafif betonun mekanik özelliklerinin araştırılması

Nusret BOZKURT
Salih YAZICIOĞLU
Pages
675–680
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, UK concrete series gave very close results to control concrete at advanced ages (90 days).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper reports an experimental investigation carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties of structural lightweight concrete produced with pumice and mineral admixtures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:CEM I 42,5 N cement used in the study was partially replaced with silica fume (SD) 10% and fly ash (UK) 30% by weight, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, UK concrete series gave very close results to control concrete at advanced ages (90 days).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper reports an experimental investigation carried out to evaluate the mechanical properties of structural lightweight concrete produced with pumice and mineral admixtures. CEM I 42,5 N cement used in the study was partially replaced with silica fume (SD) 10% and fly ash (UK) 30% by weight, respectively. The tests of compressive strength, split tensile strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity were performed in the specimens prepared with mineral admixtures at ages of 3, 7, 14, 28 and 90 days. From the results it was seen that specimens prepared with silica fume showed better strength properties than other test specimens. While control concrete specimens showed similar strength properties to concrete specimens with silica fume admixture at early ages those of concrete specimens with fly ash admixture did not increase at early ages. Furthermore, UK concrete series gave very close results to control concrete at advanced ages (90 days).

Özet

Bu çalışmada, pomza ve mineral katkılı taşıyıcı hafif betonun mekanik özellikleri araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada CEM I 42,5 N sınıfı çimento kullanılmış olup mineral katkı olarak kullanılan silis dumanı (SD) %10 ve uçucu kül (UK) %30 oranlarında çimento ile ağırlıkça yer değiştirilmiştir. Kullanılan katkılarla birlikte hazırlanan 3, 7, 14, 28 ve 90 günlük numunelere basınç, yarmada çekme dayanımı ve ultrasonik test deneyleri uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre silis dumanı katkılı beton numunelerin her yaşta daha iyi dayanım özellikleri sergilediği görülmüştür. Kontrol betonu olarak hazırlanan numuneler ilk yaşlarda silis dumanı katkılı beton numunelerle benzer özellikler sergilerken uçucu kül katkılı beton serilerinde erken yaşlarda belirgin bir artış gözlenmemiştir. Bununla birlikte UK beton serisi ileri yaşlarda (90 gün) kontrol betonuna daha yakın sonuçlar vermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKURT, N., YAZICIOĞLU, S. (2022). The investigation of the mechnanical properties of structural lightweight concrete produced with pumice and mineral admixtures. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 675–680. https://ajindex.com/articles/524132

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Haque, M.N., Al-Khaiat, H., Kayali, O., “Strength and Durability of Lightweight Concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites, No. 26, 307-314, 2004
  2. Kok, S.C., Min-Hong, Z., “Water Permeability and Chloride Penetrability of High-Strength Lightweight Aggregate Concrete”, Cement and Concrete Research, No. 32, 639-645, 2002
  3. Sari, D., Paşamehmetoğlu, A.G., “The Effects of Gradation and Admixture on the Pumice Lightweight Aggregate Concrete”, Cement And Concrete Research, No. 35(5), 936-942, 2005
  4. Mindess, S., Young, J. F., Concrete, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981
  5. Giaccio, G., Rocco, C., Violini, D., Zappitelli J., Zerbino, R., “High-Strength Concrete Incorporating Different Coarse Aggregates”, ACI Matter, No. 89(3), 242-246, 1992
  6. Baalbaki, W., Benmokrance, B., Chaallal, O., Aitcin, P.C., “Influence of Coarse Aggregates on Elastic Properties of High Performance Concrete”, ACI Matter, No 88(5), 499-503, 1991
  7. Nilsen, A.U., Monteiro, J.M., Gjorv, O.E., “Estimation of the Elastic Modulus of Lightweight Aggregate”, Cement And Concrete Research, No. 25(2), 276-280, 1995
  8. Yang, C.C., Huang, R, “A Two-Phase Model for Predicting the Compresive Strength of Concrete”, Cement And Concrete Research, No. 26(10), 1567-1577, 1996
  9. Lydon, F.D., Concrete Mix Design, Applied Science Publishers, 2nd ed., London, 1982
  10. Topcu, İ.B., “Semi-Lightweight Concretes Produced by Volcanic Slags”, Cement And Concrete Research, No. 27, 15-21, 1997
  11. Al-Khaiat, H., Haque, M.N., “Effect of Initial Curing on Early Strength and Physical Properties of Lightweight Concrete”, Cement And Concrete Research, No. 28, 859-866, 1998
  12. Yasar, E., Atis, C. D., Kilic, A., Gulsen, H., “Strength Properties of Lightweight Concrete Made with Basaltic Pumice and Fly Ash”, Materials Letters, No. 57, 2267-2270, 2003
  13. Erdoğan, T.Y., Beton, ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı Yayıncılık ve İletişim A.Ş. Yayını, Ankara, 2003
  14. ASTM C 597, “Standart Test Method For Pulse Velocity Through Concrete”, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994
  15. TS EN 12390-3, “Beton-sertleşmiş Beton Deneyleri -Bölüm 3: Deney Numunelerinde Basınç Dayanımının Tayini”, TSE, Ankara, 2003
  16. TS EN 12390-6, “Beton-Sertleşmiş Beton Deneyleri -Bölüm 6: Deney Numunelerinin Yarmada Çekme Dayanımının Tayini”, TSE, Ankara, 2002
  17. Tasdemir, C., “Combined Effects of Mineral Admixtures and Curing Conditions on the Sorptivity Coefficient of Concrete”, Cement And Concrete Research, No 33, 1637–1642, 2003