SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of adhesive wear behavior of counter gravity and traditional casting process AlSi alloy

Yerçekimine ters ve geleneksel döküm yöntemleri ile üretilen AlSi alaşımının adhesif aşınma davranışının incelenmesi

Ferhat GÜL
Hasan HASIRCI
Pages
267–273
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Adhesive wear test results showed that the specimens have similar wear trend with hardness results under low load (20N), but when the load increased (60N), the specimen with highest hardness exhibited the worst adhesive wear resistance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, effect of counter gravity casting method on the adhesive wear behaviors of AlSi alloy was investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The counter gravity casting and gravity casting specimens were produced by pouring at 600, 640 and 690 °C, with 100, 250 and 500 mmHg vacuum level in sand mould.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Adhesive wear test results showed that the specimens have similar wear trend with hardness results under low load (20N), but when the load increased (60N), the specimen with highest hardness exhibited the worst adhesive wear resistance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, effect of counter gravity casting method on the adhesive wear behaviors of AlSi alloy was investigated. The counter gravity casting and gravity casting specimens were produced by pouring at 600, 640 and 690 °C, with 100, 250 and 500 mmHg vacuum level in sand mould. These specimens were tested on the modified pin on disk adhesive wear tester. Adhesive wear tests were performed on the under normal loads of 20 and 60 N, and sliding speed of 1 m/s. Adhesive wear test results showed that the specimens have similar wear trend with hardness results under low load (20N), but when the load increased (60N), the specimen with highest hardness exhibited the worst adhesive wear resistance.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, geleneksel yerçekimi ve yerçekimine ters döküm yöntemleri ile üretilen AlSi alüminyum alaşımının adhesif aşınma davranışı incelendi. Numuneler, yerçekimine ters ve geleneksel döküm yöntemleri ile yaş kum kalıba 600, 640 ve 690 °C sıcaklıkta, 100, 250 ve 500 mmHg vakum şartlarında dökülerek üretildi. Bu numuneler, disk üzerinde pim adesif aşınma cihazında test edildi. Adhesif aşınma testleri 20 ve 60 N yükler altında ve 1 m/s kayma hızında gerçekleştirildi. Adhesif aşınma test sonuçları; düşük yükte (20N) alaşımın aşınma kaybının sertliği ile benzer bir değişim sergilediği, ancak yük arttığında (60N) alaşımda meydana gelen sertlik artışından dolayı nedeniyle adhesif aşınma direncinin azaldığını gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜL, F., HASIRCI, H. (2022). Investigation of adhesive wear behavior of counter gravity and traditional casting process AlSi alloy. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 267–273. https://ajindex.com/articles/524037

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Chandley, G.D., “Counter Gravity Casting of Aluminum in Investment and Sand Molds”, AFS Transactions, 86-39, 209-214, 1986
  2. Anon, “Turning the Gating World Upside Down”, Thecnical Paper, Hitchiner Manufacturing Co., (www.hitchiner.com),, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2004)
  3. Ripkin, F. and Lipson, S., “Counter Gravity Casting of Aluminum Alloys in Green Sand Molds”, AFS Transactions, 67-70, 581-592, 1967
  4. Lipson, S. and Ripkin, F., “Effect of Sections Thickness osn The Tensile Properties of Thin- Section Aluminum Alloy Sand Casting”, AFS Transactions, 69, 192-197, 1969
  5. Chandley, G.D. and Flemings, M.C., “Gating Premium Quality Casting”, AFS Transactions, 88-37, 121-128, 1988
  6. Flemings, M.C., Conrad, H.F.and Taylor, H.F., “Aluminum Alloys Fluidity Test”, AFS Transactions, 93-59, 496-507, 1993
  7. Katzarov, I.H. and others, “Porosity Formation in Axi-symetric Castings Produced by Counter- Pressure Casting Method”, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol 44, 111-119, 2001
  8. Stefanescu, D.M. and others, “In Situ Resource Utilization for Processing of Metal Alloys on Lunar and Mars Bases”, www. science.nasa.gov/newhome/ headlines/ space98pdf/insitu.pdf,, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2004)
  9. Chandley, G.D., “Use of Vacuum for Counter Gravity Casting of Metals”, Materals Res. Innovant, 14-23, 1999
  10. Chandley, G.D., “Making casting without ladles or sprues – the CLA process”, AFS Transactions, 76-28, 37-42, 1976
  11. Campbell, J., “Reliable Castings Suppluy –a report”, www.wmrc.com/businessbriefing/pdf / auto2001/book/campbell.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2004)
  12. Chendley, D. and others, “Development of Thin- Wall Stanless Steel Castings Using Countergravity Process for Automobile Application”, AFS Transactions, 96-82, 903- 906, 1996
  13. Bakhtiyarov, S.I. and others, “Advances in Countergravity Lost Foam Casting Process”, AFS Transactions, 00-49, 137-145, 2000
  14. Westendorf, T.M. and others, “Countergravity Casting of Thin-Wall Al A356, Part I: A Castability Study”,AFS Transactions, 98-100, 559-562, 1998
  15. Shenefelt, J.R. and others, “Countergravity Casting of Thin-Wall Al A356, Part II: Result of Casting Characterization Studies”, AFS Transactions, 98-101, 563-566, 1998
  16. Chandley, G.D., “Automatic Counter Gravity Casting of Shell Molds”, AFS Transactions, 83- 23, 199-204, 1983
  17. Anon, Metal casting and molding process, American Foundryman’s Society publications, Illinois, USA, 1981
  18. Jiang Q.C., Xu C.L., Lu M. and Wang H.Y