SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Characteristics of Roman period building bricks in Anatolia

Anadolu'da Roma dönemi yapı tuğlalarının özellikleri

Elif Uğurlu SAĞIN
Pages
205–214
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analyses results indicated that Roman period building bricks were manufactured by using calciumrich clay sources and fired at low temperatures (

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, chemical and mineralogical compositions, physical, microstructural and pozzolanic propertiesof Roman Period building bricks taken from Kızıl Avlu (Serapeum) in Pergamon and from several different buildings from ancient sites of Aigai and Nysa were determined by using XRF, XRD, FTIR, SEM-EDS and chemical analyses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Chemical compositions of bricks were evaluted by statistical analyses inorder to identify whether or not these bricks were manufactured by using same natural raw materialsources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analyses results indicated that Roman period building bricks were manufactured by using calciumrich clay sources and fired at low temperatures (
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, chemical and mineralogical compositions, physical, microstructural and pozzolanic propertiesof Roman Period building bricks taken from Kızıl Avlu (Serapeum) in Pergamon and from several different buildings from ancient sites of Aigai and Nysa were determined by using XRF, XRD, FTIR, SEM-EDS and chemical analyses. Chemical compositions of bricks were evaluted by statistical analyses inorder to identify whether or not these bricks were manufactured by using same natural raw materialsources. Analyses results indicated that Roman period building bricks were manufactured by using calciumrich clay sources and fired at low temperatures (

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Bergama'da bulunan Kızıl Avlu (Serapeum) ile Aigai ve Nysa antik kentlerinde bulunanfarklı yapılardan alınan Roma dönemi yapı tuğlalarının kimyasal ve mineralojik kompozisyonları, fiziksel,mikroyapısal ve puzolanik özellikleri XRF, XRD, FTIR, SEM-EDS ve kimyasal analizler ile belirlenmiştir.Tuğlaların kimyasal kompozisyonlarını oluşturan temel oksitler ve eser elementler istatistik yöntemlerkullanılarak tuğlaların üretiminde kullanılan hammadde kaynaklarının aynı olup olmadığını belirlemeyeyönelik olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, Roma dönemi yapı tuğlalarının kalsiyumca zenginkil kaynakları kullanılarak ve düşük sıcaklıklarda (

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞIN, E. U. (2022). Characteristics of Roman period building bricks in Anatolia. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 205–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/523548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ward-Perkins J.B., Roman Imperial Architecture, Yale University Press, New Haven&London, 1981
  2. Adam J.P., Roman Building Materials and Techniques (First published in 1937), Çeviri: Anthony Mathews, Routledge, Londra&New York, İngiltere&A.B.D., 2005
  3. Schalenghe R., Barello F., Saiano F., Ferrara E., Fontaine C., Caner L., Olivetti E., Boni I., Petit S., Material sources of the Roman brick-making industry in the I and II Century A.D. from Regio IX, Regio XI and Alpes Cottiae, Quat. Int., 357, 189-206, 2015
  4. MacDonald W.L., The Architecture of the Roman Empire, Yale University Press, New Haven&London, 1965
  5. Finlay A.J., McComish J.M., Ottley C.J., Bates C.R., Selby D., Trace element fingerprinting of ceramic building material from Corpow and York Roman fortresses manufactured by the VI Legion, J. Archaeolog. Sci., 39, 2385-2391, 2012
  6. RILEM, Tests defining the structure, Mater. Constr., 13 (75), 177-181, 1980
  7. Luxán M.P., Madruga F., Saavedra J., Rapid evaluation of pozzolanic activity of natural products of conductivity measurement, Cem. Concr. Res., 19, 63- 68, 1989
  8. Stefanidou M., Papayianni I., Pachta V., Analysis and characterization of Roman and Byzantine fired bricks from Greece, Mater. Struct., 48, 2251-2260, 2015
  9. ASTM International, ASTM C67-07 Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile, West Conshohocken, PA, 2007
  10. Cultrone G., Sebastián E., Elert K., De La Torre M.J., Cazalla O., Rodriguez-Navarro C., Influence of mineralogy and firing temperature on the porosity of bricks, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 24, 547-564, 2004
  11. Elert K., Cultrone G., Rodriguez-Navarro C., Pardo E.S., Durability of bricks used in the conservation of historic buildings - influence of composition and microstructure, J. Cult. Heritage, 4, 91-99, 2003
  12. Carratero M.I., Dondi M., Fabbri B., Raimondo M., The influence of shaping and firing technology on ceramic properties of calcareous and non-calcareous illitic-chloritic clays, Appl. Clay Sci., 20, 301-306, 2002
  13. He C., Osbaeck B., Makavicky E., Pozzolanic reactions of six principal clay minerals: activation, reactivity assessments and technological effects, Cem. Concr. Res., 25/8, 1691-1702, 1995
  14. Hopa D.Y., Özel E., Effect of Kaolin type on pyroplastic deformation of sanitaryware porcelain body, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 31 (2), 313-322, 2016
  15. Rodrigues S.F.S., da Costa M.L., Pöllmann H., Kern D.C., da