Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Problem Posing Experiences and Using Open-Ended Questions in Mathematics Teaching

Problem Kurma Deneyimleri ve Matematik Öğretiminde Açık-Uçlu Soruların Kullanımı

Pages
129–146
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, after a teaching via a problem posing approach, the gained data are classified.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to explore effects of using short open-ended mathematics questions in mathematics education and of using problem posing approach on understanding and learning mathematical concepts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants for this study included three elementary school 5th grade teachers from two different elementary schools and their 84 students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, after a teaching via a problem posing approach, the gained data are classified.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to explore effects of using short open-ended mathematics questions in mathematics education and of using problem posing approach on understanding and learning mathematical concepts. The participants for this study included three elementary school 5th grade teachers from two different elementary schools and their 84 students. This study was undertaken during the 2004-2005 school years’ second semester in Yenimahalle and Keçiören districts of Ankara between April and May. In this study, experiences of these teachers who used short open-ended mathematics questions to make their pupils understand mathematical concepts and to express their thinking by different ways are considered. Furthermore, after a teaching via a problem posing approach, the gained data are classified.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı matematik öğretiminde kısa açık uçlu soruların ve problem kurma yaklaşımının kullanılmasının matematiksel kavramları anlamaya ve öğrenmeye olan etkisini araştırmaktır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu iki ayrı ilköğretim okulunda çalışan üç tane ilkokul beşinci sınıf öğretmeni ve onların toplam 84 öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma 2004-2005 eğitim öğretim yılı ikinci yarı yılında Ankara’nın Yenimahalle ve Keçiören ilçelerinde bulunan iki ilköğretim okulunda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, öğretimlerinde açık-uçlu kısa matematik soruları kullanan bu öğretmenlerin, öğrencilerin matematiksel kavramları değişik yollarla anlayabilmelerini ve düşüncelerini farklı şekilde ifade edebilmelerini sağlamak amacıyla yaptıkları çalışmalar ele alınmaktadır. Ayrıca problem kurma yaklaşımı ile yapılan bir öğretim sonucunda öğrencilerden elde edilen verilerin bir sınıflandırması yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOYBAŞ, D., ARGÜN, Z., AKAY, H. (2022). Problem Posing Experiences and Using Open-Ended Questions in Mathematics Teaching. Gazi Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 129–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/523143

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. AÇIKGÖZ, K.Ü. (2003), Aktif Öğrenme, Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları,3. Baskı, İzmir
  2. BENSON, G. D. (2001) Science Education from a social Constructivist Position: A Worldwiev, Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol 20, 443-452
  3. CAROLL, W. M. (1999). Using short questions to develop and assess Reasoning. In L.V. Stiff & F.R. Curcio (Eds.), Developing and mathematical Reasoning in grades K-12, 1999 Yearbook (pp. 247-255). Reston, Va: NCTM
  4. CHANG, S. C., Kaur, B., Koay, P. L. & Lee, N. H. (2001). An exploratory analysis of current pedagogical practises in primary mathematics classroom. The NIE Researcher, 1 (2), 7-8
  5. COBERN, W. W. (1993).Constructivism, Journal of Educational Psychological Consultation, Vol 4 (1),105-120
  6. ENGLISH, L. (1998). Children’s Problem Posing within formal and Informal Contexts, JRME, January, p. 83
  7. FOONG, P. Y. (1990). A metacognitive-heuristic approach to mathematical problem solving, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Monash University. Australia
  8. FOONG, P. Y. (2004). Using Short Open-ended Mathematics Questions to Promote Thinking and Understanding, National Institute of Education, Singapore, 135-140
  9. GRANDSARD, F and SCHATTEMAN, A. (1989). Problem Solving for First Year University Students, in: “Modelling, Applications and Applied Problem Solving”, eds Blum, Niss & Huntley, 1989, p. 177-183
  10. KANTARLI, K. (2004). Fizik Eğitiminde Problem Çözme Stratejisi ve Probleme Dayalı İşbirlikçi Öğrenme, (
  11. KORKMAZ, E., Gür, H., Ersoy Y. (2004). Problem Kurma ve Çözme Yaklaşımlı Matematik Öğretimi-II, Matematikçiler Derneği Bilim Köşesi, Okuma sayısı 403
  12. MATTHEWS, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and Science Education: A Further Appraisal, Journal of Science Education on Technology, Vol 11 (2), June, 121-134
  13. MESTRE, J. P. (1991), Physics Today, September, s. 56
  14. MOE (2000), Revised syllabus for primary mathematics. Curriculum Plannning and Development Division. Ministry of Education. Singapore
  15. NCTM (1991). Principals and Standarts for School Mathematics, Reston, Va: National counsil of Teachers of Mathematics Pub
  16. NIXON-PONDER, S. (2001). Teacher to Teacher: Using Problem Posing Dialogue in Adult Literacy Education. (
  17. SCHOENFELD, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving, New York: Academic Pres
  18. SENEMOĞLU, N. (2002). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim,(Kuramdan Uygulamaya), Gazi Kitabev