SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1-2

Convention on Choice of Court Agreements is a convention of international procedure law

30 Haziran 2005 tarihli yetki anlaşmasına dair lahey sözleşmesi

Feriha Bilge TANRIBİLİR
Pages
321–354
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Convention has aimed to maintain effectiveness of choice of court agreements among Contracting States.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Convention on Choice of Court Agreements is a convention of international procedure law that was drawn up at the Twentieth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A Contracting State has three obligation with this Convention: 1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Convention has aimed to maintain effectiveness of choice of court agreements among Contracting States.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Convention on Choice of Court Agreements is a convention of international procedure law that was drawn up at the Twentieth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The Convention is mainly about exclusive choice of court agreements and effects of judgments resulting from proceedings based on such agreements. A Contracting State has three obligation with this Convention: 1. The chosen court that designated in exclusive choice of court agreements must hear the case, 2. A court of a Contracting State other than that of the chosen court can not hear the case,3. A judgment given by a court of a Contracting State designated in a exclusive choice of court agreements shall be recognised and enforced in other Contracting States. The Convention has aimed to maintain effectiveness of choice of court agreements among Contracting States.

Özet

Yetki Anlasmasına Dair Lahey Sözlesmesi, Lahey Devletler Özel Hukuku Konferansının yirminci oturumunda kabul edilmis bir milletlerarası usul hukuku sözlesmesidir. Sözlesme esas itibariyle münhasır yetki anlasmalarını ve yetkili kılınan mahkemenin verdiği kararların etkisini düzenlemektedir. Âkit devletler üç konuda yükümlülük altına girmektedirler: 1. Sözlesmeye uygun olarak hazırlanmıs bir münhasır yetki anlasması ile yetkili kılınan devlet mahkemesi davayı görmelidir, 2. Münhasır yetki anlasması ile yetkili kılınan mahkeme dısında baska bir âkit devlet mahkemesi davaya bakamaz, 3. Münhasır yetkili kılınan devlet mahkemesinin verdiği kararlar diğer âkit devletlerde tanınır ve tenfi z edilir. Sözlesme, yetki anlasmalarının, en azından, âkit devletler arasında etkinliğini sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANRIBİLİR, F. B. (2022). Convention on Choice of Court Agreements is a convention of international procedure law. Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1-2, 321–354. https://ajindex.com/articles/522882

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. AKINCI, Z.: Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda Yetki Sözlesmesine Dayanan Yabancı Derdestlik, Ankara 2002. American Bar Association adopted by the House of Delegates, (7-8.8.2006), Recommendation http://www.abanet.org/intlaw/policy/investment/hcca0806.pdf (18.2.2008).
  2. AUST, A.: Modern Treaty Law and Practice, Cambridge 2000.
  3. BAYRAKTAROĞLU-ÖZÇELİK, B.: Avrupa Topluluğunun Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk alanında Uluslararası Anlasma Akdetme Yetkisi ve C-01/03 sayılı ve 7 Subat 2006 Tarihli Avrupa Toplulukları Adalet Divanı Görüsü, AÜHFD, 57(2008), S. 2, s.17-50.
  4. BIRNBAUM, S.L./DUNHAM, D.W.: Foreign Plaintiffs and Forum Non Conveniens, Brook.J.Int’l L., 16(1990), s. 241-265.
  5. BRAND, R.A.: Introductory Note to the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Int’l Legal Materials, 44(2005), s. 1291-1293.
  6. BERLIN, M.B.: The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: Creating an International Framework for Recognizing Foreign Judgements, Int’l L.&Mgmt Rev., 3(2006), s. 43-78.
  7. DOĞAN, V.:Türk Hukukunda Yabancı Derdestlik, Prof. Dr. Ergin Nomer Armağanı, MHB, 22(2002), S. 2, s. 121-147.
  8. DICEY, A./MORRIS, J.: The Confl ict of Laws, 13. bası, (ed. L. Collins ve diğerleri), Londra 2000.
  9. FAWCETT, J.: The Interrelationships of Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Private International Law, Current Legal Problems, 44(1991), s. 39-62.
  10. HARTLEY, C.: Hague Choice-of-Court Convention, European Law Review, 31(2006), S. 3, s. 414-424.
  11. HARTLEY, T.C./DOGAUCHI, M.: Explanatory Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No 25 of March 2004, http://www.hcch.net/index _en. php ?act =publications.details&pid=3510&dtid=35 (18.2.2008).
  12. HARTLEY, T.C./DOGAUCHI, M.: Draft Report, Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No 26 of December 2004, http:// www.hcch. net/upload /wop/jdgm _ pd26e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  13. HARTLEY, T./DOGAUCHI, M.: Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, Explanatory Report, (report), http://www.hcch.net/upload/expl37e.pdf (18.2.2008).
  14. KRUGER, T.: The 20th Session of Hague Conference: A New Choice of Court Convention and the Issue of EC Membership, Int’l&Comp.L.Q., 55(2006), s. 447- 455. KURU, B.: Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usulü, C. I, 4. Bası, Ankara 1979.
  15. NANDA, V.P.: The Landmark 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Texas Int’l L.J.,,42(2007), s. 773-788.
  16. NOMER, E./SANLI, C.: Devletler Hususî Hukuku, 16. bası, İstanbul 2008.
  17. NORTH, P./FAWCETT, J.: Cheshire and Nor