SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE LAW APPLICABLE TO NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS (ROME II)

Akit-Dışı Borçlara Uygulanacak Hukuka İlişkin Tüzükte (Roma II) Ürün Sorumluluğu

Feriha Bilge TANRIBİLİR
Pages
121–140
Publication Date
2010-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study attempts a critical approach of the provisions of Rome II Regulation and Turkish Law

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article reviews a connecting rule on the product liability of the European Union’s Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Article 5/1 of the Rome II Regulation is the cascade connections in three levels: habitual residence of person who sustains the damage, place of acquisition of product and place where damage occurred.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study attempts a critical approach of the provisions of Rome II Regulation and Turkish Law
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Roma II · Roma II Tüzüğü · ürün sorumluluğu

Abstract

This article reviews a connecting rule on the product liability of the European Union’s Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II). Article 5/1 of the Rome II Regulation is the cascade connections in three levels: habitual residence of person who sustains the damage, place of acquisition of product and place where damage occurred. All three levels should be together another condition that the product was marketed in that country. It is accepted an escape clause under Article 5/2 of Rome II Regulation. Besides this article does not prevent to Article 4/2 which is general rule related to the common habitual residence. On the other hand Turkish Act of Private International Law and Procedure Law (5718) has a special connection rule on the product liability, Article 36. According to this provision it is chosen one of law of habitual residence or place of business of the person claimed to be liable, and the law of acquisition of product by the plaintiff. This study attempts a critical approach of the provisions of Rome II Regulation and Turkish Law

Özet

Bu makalede Avrupa Birliğinin Akit Dışı Borçlara Uygulanacak Hukuka İlişkin Tüzüğünün ürün sorumluluğuna dair bağlama kuralı ele alınmaktadır. Roma II Tüzüğünün 5/1 maddesi üç kademeli bağlama kuralıdır: zarar görenin mutad meskeni, ürünün iktisap edildiği yer ve zararın medyama geldiği yer. Her üç kademe de ürünün bu devlette pazara sürülmüş olması şartıyla birlikte bulunmalıdır. Roma II Tüzüğünün 5/2 hükmünde bir istisna kuralı da kabul edilmiştir. Öte yandan bu madde ortak ikametgah hukukunun uygulanmasını öngören 4/2. maddede yer alan genel kuralın uygulanmasına engel olmamaktadır. Türk Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk ve Usul Hukuku Hakkında Kanun (5718) 36. maddesinde ürün sorumluluğuna ilişkin özel bir bağlama kuralı ihtiva etmektedir. Bu hükme göre davacı davalının mutad meskeni hukuku, davalının işyeri merkezi hukuku ile ürünün iktisap edildiği yer hukukundan birini seçebilir. Bu çalışma Roma II Tüzüğü ile Türk hukukunda yer alan hükümlerini eleştirel bir yaklaşımla incelemeyi hedeflemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

TANRIBİLİR, F. B. (2010). PRODUCT LIABILITY IN THE LAW APPLICABLE TO NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS (ROME II). Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 121–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/462839

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Regulation on the Law Applicable To Non-Contractual Obligations (“ROME II”), COM (2006) 83, fi nal, http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/doc_ centre/civil/ doc/com_2006_83_en.pdf Başbakanlık Dış Ticaret Müsteşarlığının 2009 yılı verileri. http://www.dtm. gov.tr/dtmadmin/upload/EAD/ IstatistikDb/eko01.xls Convention of 2 October 1973 on the Law Applicable to Products Liability www.hccc.net/e/conventions/text De Boer, Th.M.: Party Autonomy and Its Limitations in the Rome II Regulation, Yearbook of Private International Law, 9(2007), s. 19-29.
  2. Doğan, V.: Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Ankara 2010.
  3. Fröhlich, C.W.: The Private International Law of Non-Contractual Obligations According to the Rome-II Regulation, A Comparative Study of the Choice of Law Rules in Tort Under European, English and German Law, Hamburg 2008.
  4. Garriga, G.: Relationships between “Rome II” and other international instruments, A commentary on Article 28 of the Rome II Regulation, Yearbook of Private International Law, 9(2007), s. 137-148.
  5. Hay, P.: Contemporary approaches to non-conctual obligations in private international law (Confl ict of Laws) and the European Community’s “Rome II” Regulation, Chines Yearbook of Private International Law and Comperative Law, 2008, s. 33-92.
  6. Huber, P./Illmer, M.: A Commentary on Article 5 of the Rome II Regulation, Yearbook of Private International Law, 9(2007), s. 31-47.
  7. Illmer, M.: The New European Private International Law of Product Liability – Steering Through Troubled Waters, RabelsZ Bd. 73 (2009), s. 269 Kadner Graziano, T.: The law Applicaple to product liability – The present state of the law in Europe and current proposals for reform, ICLQ, 54(2005), s. 475-488.
  8. Nomer, E/Şanlı, C.: Devletler Hususî Hukuku, 17. B., İstanbul 2009.
  9. Posch, W.: The “Draft Regulation Rome II” in 2004:
  10. Its past and future perpectives, Yearbook of Private International Law, 6(2004), s. 129- 153. Proposal For A Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (“Rome II”), COM (2003) 427 fi nal, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex UriServ. do?uri=CELEX:52003PC0427: EN:HTML Reese, WLM.: Explanatory Report, Convention on the Law Applicable to Products Liability, Lahey 1974. REGULATION (EC) No 864/2007 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non- contractual obligations (Rome II), OJ 31.7.2007-L199. Stone, P.: The Rome I