Journals / Frankofoni / 2006 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 18

La Réécriture

Yeniden Yazmak

Journal
Frankofoni
Pages
157–181
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This history of the rewriting carried out starting from some French writers will show that, even during a time when the writers assert the originality vigorously and refuse the imitation, like the romantic time, the rewriting is however at the origin of works of several writers and the mechanisms of literary creation remain mechanisms of rewriting the mechanisms of literary creation remain mechanisms of rewriting.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:'Recrire' (to write again) is, according to the dictionary of Littre, to write or, if one prefers, to write again what was already written.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The rewriting can be also heard as the return of a writer on his own writing, the words of oneself like those of another, one can then see it like a self-rewriting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This history of the rewriting carried out starting from some French writers will show that, even during a time when the writers assert the originality vigorously and refuse the imitation, like the romantic time, the rewriting is however at the origin of works of several writers and the mechanisms of literary creation remain mechanisms of rewriting the mechanisms of literary creation remain mechanisms of rewriting.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

'Recrire' (to write again) is, according to the dictionary of Littre, to write or, if one prefers, to write again what was already written. The rewriting can be also heard as the return of a writer on his own writing, the words of oneself like those of another, one can then see it like a self-rewriting. Defined by Dupriez like "successive lessons of the same text, which can be characterized by some variable, but also by sometimes considerable differences in the contents, the form, even the intention and dimensions", the rewriting, in a modern context, seems the fundamental principle of any writing if one refere to the concepts of intertextuality and hypertextuality updated by contemporary literary criticism. Without trying to make a thorough definition of the concept, we propose, in this work, to outline a short history of the rewriting. This history of the rewriting carried out starting from some French writers will show that, even during a time when the writers assert the originality vigorously and refuse the imitation, like the romantic time, the rewriting is however at the origin of works of several writers and the mechanisms of literary creation remain mechanisms of rewriting the mechanisms of literary creation remain mechanisms of rewriting.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTULUM, K. (2022). La Réécriture. Frankofoni, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 18, 157–181. https://ajindex.com/articles/518321

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. K. Aktulum, Metinlerarasi İlişkiler, Öteki yayınlan, 1999 2. K. Aktulum, Parçalılık/Metinlerarasılık, Öteki yayınlan, 2004 3. A. Albalat, La Formation du style par I'assimilation des auteurs, Armand Colin, 1901,1991 4. T. Aron, La Reecriture du texte litteraire, Annales litteraires de l'universite de Besançon,Les Belles Lettres, 1987 5. A. Bouillaguet, L'Ecriture imitative, pastiche, parodie, collage, Nathan, 1996 6. A. Compagnon, La Seconde Main ou le Travail de la cuation, Seuil, 1979 7. B. Dupriez, Gradus, Lesprocedes litteraires, UGE, 10/18, 1984 8. G. Genette, Palimpsestes, la Litterature au second degree, Seuil, 1982 9. D. Sangsue, La Parodie, Hachette, 1994 10.M. Schneider, Voleurs de Mots, Gallimard, 1985