Journals / Akademik Hassasiyetler / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

PLACE OF HERMENEUTIC APPROACH IN MEASUREMENT OF FATHER INVOLVEMENT

BABA KATILIMI ÖLÇÜMÜNDE YORUMSAMACI YAKLAŞIMIN YERİ

Pages
407–430
Publication Date
2020-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been concluded that the measurements and evaluations made in the involvement of paternity are made by taking the positivist tradition as the center and the necessity to discuss the paternity behaviors in a qualitative context has taken its place in the discussions in this field.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conceptualized as a role resulting from a biological bond with the child, paternity contains many different and complex elements that cannot be compressed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accurate definitions of the concept of paternity will allow the discovery of this phenomenon and the measurement of its concepts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been concluded that the measurements and evaluations made in the involvement of paternity are made by taking the positivist tradition as the center and the necessity to discuss the paternity behaviors in a qualitative context has taken its place in the discussions in this field.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler BABALIK · BABA KATILIMI · BABALIK KÜLTÜRÜ

Abstract

Conceptualized as a role resulting from a biological bond with the child, paternity contains many different and complex elements that cannot be compressed. It is more meaningful that this phenomenon, which has different forms in many fields such as social, cultural, historical, racial and ethnic, is the result of a social construction process rather than a biological bond. Accurate definitions of the concept of paternity will allow the discovery of this phenomenon and the measurement of its concepts. In this study, the conceptual definitions of paternity phenomenon and its sub-concepts are discussed and the approaches about the measurement of paternity involvement which are shown as the reflection of this phenomenon in practical life are discussed. Although the concept of more involvement corresponds to different conceptual approaches in many studies, paternity involvement is most often compared to motherhood involvement. The fact that the context in which the role of paternity is different from the role of motherhood brings with it the mistake of comparing these two roles. It has been concluded that the measurements and evaluations made in the involvement of paternity are made by taking the positivist tradition as the center and the necessity to discuss the paternity behaviors in a qualitative context has taken its place in the discussions in this field.

Özet

Çocuk ile kurulan biyolojik bir bağ neticesinde ortaya çıkan bir rol olarak kavramsallaştırılan babalık bu bağlama sıkıştırılamayacak kadar pek çok farklı ve karmaşık ögeyi içinde barındırmaktadır. Toplumsal, kültürel, tarihsel, ırksal, etnik gibi pek çok alanda farklı formları olan bu olgunun biyolojik bir bağdan çok sosyal bir inşa sürecinin neticesi olması daha anlamlı durmaktadır. Babalık olgusuna dair kavramsal tanımlamaların doğru olarak yapılması bu olgunun keşfedilmesine ve ona ait kavramların ölçümlenmesine imkân sağlayacaktır. Bu çalışmada babalık olgusu ve ona ait alt kavramların kavramsal düzeyde tanımlamaları ele alınmış ve bu olgunun pratik yaşamdaki yansıması olarak gösterilen babalık katılımının ölçümüne dair yaklaşımlar ele alınarak tartışılmıştır. Daha fazla katılım kavramı pek çok çalışmada farklı kavramsal yaklaşımlara karşılık gelmekle birlikte babalık katılımı en çok annelik katılımı ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Babalık rolünün içinde bulunduğu bağlamın annelik rolünden farklı olması bu iki rolün karşılaştırılmasının yanlışlığını da beraberinde getirmektedir. Babalık katılımında yapılan ölçüm ve değerlendirmelerin pozitivist gelenek merkeze alınarak yapılmakta olduğu sonuçlarına ulaşılmış olup babalık davranışlarının niteliksel bağlamda tartışılmasının gerekliliği bu alanda yapılan tartışmalarda yerini almıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDEM, S. (2020). PLACE OF HERMENEUTIC APPROACH IN MEASUREMENT OF FATHER INVOLVEMENT. Akademik Hassasiyetler, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 407–430. https://ajindex.com/articles/51810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Allen, S. and Daly, K. (2007). The Effects of Father Involvement: An Updated Research Summary of The Evidence. University of Guelph: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being. Baxter, J. A. (2012). “Fathering Across Families: How Father Involvement Varies For Children When Their Father Has Children Living Elsewhere”. Journal of Family Studies.18(2-3), pp.187–201. DOI: 10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.187 Biller, H. B. and Kimpton, J. L. (1997). The Father and The School-Aged Child. (Ed. M. E. Lamb). In The Role Of The Father In Child Development. New York: Wiley. pp.143–161.
  2. Blair, S. L. and Hardesty, C. (1994). “Paternal Involvement and The Well- Being of Fathers and Mothers of Young Children”. Journal of Men‟s Studies.3(1). pp.49–68. DOI: 10.1177/106082659400300103 Cabrera, N. J., Shannon, J. D. and Tamis-Le Monda, C. (2007). “Fathers Influence on Their Children‟s Cognitive and Emotional Development: From Toddlers to Pre-K”. Applied Development Science.11(4). pp.208-213. DOI: 10.1080/10888690701762100 Cabrera, N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S. and Lamb, M. E. (2000). “Fatherhood in The 21st Century. Child Development”. Child Development.71(1). pp.127–136. DOI: 10.1111/1467- 8624.00126 Carlson, M. (2006). “Family Structure, Father Involvement, and Adolescent Behavioral Outcomes”. Journal of Marriage and Family.68(1). pp.137–154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00239.x. Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1978). “And Daddy Makes Three: The Father‟s Impact on Mother and Young Child”. Child Development.49(2). pp.466–478. DOI: 10.2307/1128712 Cohen, T. F. and Dolgin, K. G. (1997). Both Sides Now: A Two- Generational Assessment of Emotional and Psychological Dimensions of Father Involvement. Arlington, VA: Paper presented at the National Council on Family Relations. Coltrane, S., Melzer, S.A., Vega, E. and Parke, R. (2005). Mexican American Fathering in Neighboorhood Context. (Eds. W. Marsiglio, K. Roy and G. L. Fox). In Situated Fathering: A Focus on Physical and Social Spaces. NY: Rowman, Littlefield Publishers. pp.277-298.
  3. Daly, K. (1993). “Reshaping Fatherhood: Finding the Models”. Journal of Family Issues.14(4). pp.510-530. DOI: 10.1177/019251393014004003 Day, R. D. and Mackey, W. C. (1986). “The Role Image of The American Father”. Journal of Comparative Family Studies.17(3). pp.371-388.
  4. Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F.and Erickson, M. F. (1998). “Responsible Fathering: An Overview and Conceptual Framework”. Journal of Marriage and The Family.60(2). pp.277–292