Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 643

The Impacts of the Credit Default Swap on the Stock Index: Asymmetric Causality Approach for BRIC Countries

Kredi Temerrüt Takasının Hisse Senedi Endeksi Üzerindeki Etkileri: BRIC Ülkeleri İçin Asimetrik Nedensellik Yaklaşımı

Pages
71–88
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Causalityanalysis reveals that the CDS’s do not have a significant influence on international capital flows andrisk appetite in Brazil and Russia as well as in India and China, and thus, it can be asserted that political,social and other economic factors may become crucial for investment decisions in stock markets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, Granger and Hatemi-J (2012) tests are used to examine whether or not the credit defaultswaps (CDS) have causality effects on stock indices in BRIC countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the findings of thestudy support the fact that a fall in Brazil's country risk leads to a decrease in stock returns, it is impliedthat stock investors may have a risk-likely behavior.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Causalityanalysis reveals that the CDS’s do not have a significant influence on international capital flows andrisk appetite in Brazil and Russia as well as in India and China, and thus, it can be asserted that political,social and other economic factors may become crucial for investment decisions in stock markets.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, Granger and Hatemi-J (2012) tests are used to examine whether or not the credit defaultswaps (CDS) have causality effects on stock indices in BRIC countries. Although the findings of thestudy support the fact that a fall in Brazil's country risk leads to a decrease in stock returns, it is impliedthat stock investors may have a risk-likely behavior. In Russia, contrary to theoretical assumptions,causality analysis shows that capital movements are closely related to the country's CDS, andthat the increase / decrease of the country risk may neither reduce nor raise stock indices. Causalityanalysis reveals that the CDS’s do not have a significant influence on international capital flows andrisk appetite in Brazil and Russia as well as in India and China, and thus, it can be asserted that political,social and other economic factors may become crucial for investment decisions in stock markets.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Granger and Hatemi-J (2012) testleri ile BRIC ülke kredi temerrüt takaslarının (KTT) hisse senedi endeksleri üzerinde nedensellik etkisine sahip olup olmadığı incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları Brezilya’nın ülke riskinin düşmesinin hisse senedi getirilerini düşürdüğünü desteklemekle birlikte, hisse senedi yatırımcılarının risk sever bir yapıya sahip olabileceğini ima etmektedir. Rusya’da ise teorik varsayımlara aykırı olarak, sermaye hareketlerinin ülke KTT ile yakından ilişkili olmadığı ve ülke riskinin artmasının/azalmasının hisse senedi getirilerini düşürebileceği/yükseltebileceği yönünde bulgulara rastlanılmamıştır. Nedensellik analizi ile KTT’lerin Brezilya ve Rusya’da olduğu gibi Hindistan ve Çin’de de uluslararası finansal sermaye akımları ve risk iştahı üzerinde belirgin bir etkiye sahip olmadığı saptanmış ve hisse senedi piyasalarındaki yatırım kararları için politik, sosyal ve diğer ekonomik faktörlerin önemli olabileceği iddia edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇELEBİ, O., TOKMAKÇIOĞLU, K., MANİOĞLU, B. (2022). The Impacts of the Credit Default Swap on the Stock Index: Asymmetric Causality Approach for BRIC Countries. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 643, 71–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/516534

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. AL-OWN Bassam, MINHAT Marizah, GAO Simon, (2018), “Stock options and credit default swaps in risk management.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 53, pp. 200-214.
  2. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE Mohsen, CHANG Tsangyao, RANJBAR Omid, (2016), “Asymmetric causality using frequency domain and time-frequency domain (wavelet) approaches.” Economic Modelling 56, pp. 66-78.
  3. BEKIROS Stelios, JLASSI Mouna, NAOUI Kamel, (2017),
  4. SALAH UDDIN, Gazi, (2017), “The asymmetric relationship between returns and implied volatility: Evidence from global stock markets.” Journal of Financial Stability 30, pp. 156-174.
  5. BOURIE Elie, GUPTA Rangan, HOSSEINI Seyedmehdi, LAU Chi Keung Marco, (2018), “Does global fear predict fear in BRICS stock markets? Evidence from a Bayesian Graphical Structural VAR model.” Emerging Markets Review 34, pp. 124-142. BYSTRÖM Hans, (2018), “Stock return expectations in the credit market.” International Review of Financial Analysis 56, pp. 85-92.
  6. DENNIS Patrick, MAYHEW Stewart, STIVERS Chris, (2006) “Stock returns, implied volatility innovations, and the asymmetric volatility phenomenon.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41(2), pp. 381-406.
  7. ECONOMOU Fotini, PANAGOPOULOS Yannis, TSOUMA Ekaterini, (2018), “Uncovering asymmetries in the relationship between fear and the stock market using a hidden co-integration approach.” Research in International Business and Finance 44, pp. 459-470.
  8. FEI Fei, FUERTES Ana-Maria, KALOTYCHOU Elena, (2017), “Dependence in credit default swap and equity markets: Dynamic copula with Markov-switching.” International Journal of Forecasting 33(3), pp. 662-678. HATEMI-J Abdulnasser, (2011), ACTEST: GAUSS module to Apply Asymmetric Causality Tests, Statistical Software Components G00014, Boston College Department of Economics. HATEMI-J Abdulnasser, (2012), “Asymmetric Causality Tests with an Application.” Empirical Economics 43(1), pp. 447-456.
  9. HATEMI-J Abdulnasser, El_KHATIB Youssef, (2016), “An Extension of the Asymmetric Causality Tests for Dealing with Deterministic Trend Components.” Applied Economics 48, pp. 4033-4041. LOW Cheekiat, (2004), “The Fear and Exuberance from Implied Volatility of S&P 100 Index Options.” The Journal of Business, 77(3), pp. 527-546. LÜTKEPOHL Helmut, (2005), New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, Springer, Berlin. LÜTKEPOHL Helmut, (2007),
  10. Univariate Time Series Analysis, Lütkepohl, H., Krätzig, M., Applied Time Series Econometrics, (8-85), Cambridge Universi