SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1

İhracata Dayalı Büyüme Hipotezi Türkiye İçin Geçerli Mi?

Burcu Özcan
Oğuzhan Özçelebi
Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results are in support of export-led growth hypothesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is generally thought that export has a crucial role in the economic development processes of countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore, import is accepted to contribute to economic performance providing intermediate and capital goods necessary for export sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results are in support of export-led growth hypothesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İhracata dayalı büyüme · ithalata dayalı büyüme · ticari serbestleşme

Abstract

It is generally thought that export has a crucial role in the economic development processes of countries. For instance, it is assumed that increasing level of export contributes to diffusion of technical knowledge. Furthermore, import is accepted to contribute to economic performance providing intermediate and capital goods necessary for export sectors. These ideas are called “export-led growth hypothesis” and “import-led growth hypothesis”, respectively. In this study, it is aimed to explore the relationships between industrial production index, export, import, and real exchange rate using Johansen co-integration method for Turkey over the period 2005(1)2011(11). The results are in support of export-led growth hypothesis.

Özet

Genellikle dış ticaretin ülkelerin iktisadi kalkınma süreçlerinde önemli bir role sahip olduğu düşünülmektedir. Örneğin, artan ihracat düzeyinin teknik bilgi düzeyinin yayılmasına yol açtığı varsayılmaktadır. Daha da ötesi, ithalatın da ihracat sektörü için gerekli olan ara ve sermaye mallarının teminini gerçekleştirerek ekonomik performansa katkıda bulunduğu kabul görmektedir. Bahsedilen bu fikirler sırasıyla “ihracata dayalı büyüme” ve “ithalata dayalı büyüme” hipotezleri şeklinde adlandırılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye için 2005(1)-2011(11) dönemi boyunca Johansen eşbütünleşme metodu kullanılarak ihracat, ithalat, sanayi üretim endeksi ve reel döviz kuru arasındaki ilişkiler irdelenmektedir. Sonuçlar, ihracata dayalı büyüme hipotezinin geçerliliği yönünde kanıtlar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özcan, B., Özçelebi, O. (2013). İhracata Dayalı Büyüme Hipotezi Türkiye İçin Geçerli Mi?. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/935846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. ABUAL-FOUL, Bassam (2004), “Testing the export-led growth hypothesis: evidence from Jordan”, Applied Economics Letters, 11:6, 393-396.
  2. ADJAYE, John Asafu ve Debasish CHAKRABORTY (1999), “Export-led Growth and Import Compression: Further Time Series Evidence From LDCs”, Australian Economic Papers, 38(2), 164-175.
  3. AFXENTIOU, Panos ve Apostolos SERLETIS (2000), “Output Growth and Variability of Export and Import Growth: International Evidence from Granger Causality Tests”, The Developing Economies, XXXVIII-2, 141–63.
  4. ASTERIOU, Dimitrios. & Stephen G. HALL (2007). Applied Econometrics A Modern Approach using E-Views and Microfit, Palgrave MacMillan.
  5. AWOKUSE, Titus O. (2003), ”Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for Canada?”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(1), 126-136.
  6. AWOKUSE, Titus O. (2008), “Trade Openness and Economic Growth: Is Growth Export-Led or import-Led?”, Applied Economics, 40,161–173.
  7. BAHMANI-OSKOOE, M. ve I. DOMAC (1995), “Export growth and economic growth in Turkey: evidence from cointegration analysis”, METU Studies in Development, 22, 67- 77.
  8. BALASSA, Bela (1978), “Exports and economic growth: Further evidence”, Journal of Development Economics, 5, 181-189.
  9. BALASSA, Bela (1985), “Exports, policy choices, and economic growth in developing countries after the 1973 oil shock”, Journal of Development Economics 4(1), 23- 35.
  10. BHAGWATI, Jagdish (1978), Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes: Liberalization Attempts and Consequences. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  11. BİLGİN, Cevat ve Ahmet ŞAHBAZ (2009), “Türkiye’de Büyüme ve İhracat Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkileri”, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 8(1): 177-198.
  12. BROOKS, Chris (2008), Introductory Econometrics for Finance, Cambridge University Press.
  13. BOZOKLU, Şeref (2005), Banka Kredisi Aktarım Mekanizması: VAR Yaklaşımı, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi
  14. CHAUDHARY, Muhammad A., SHIRAZI, Nasim S. ve Munir A.S. CHOUDHARY (2007), “Trade Policy And Economic Growth In Bangladesh: A Revisit”, Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 45(1), 1-26.
  15. CHOW, Peter C.Y. (1987), “Causality between export growth and industrial development: empirical evidence from newly industrialized countries”, Journal of Development Economics, 28, 265–76.
  16. CHENERY, Hollis B. (1961), Comparative Advantage and Development Policy, American Economic Review, 51(1), 18-51.
  17. DAWSON, Philip J. (2006), “The export–income relationship and trade liberalisation in Bangladesh” Journal of Policy Modeling, 28, 889–896.
  18. DEMİRHAN, Erdal (2005),“Büyüme Ve İhracat Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Ankara Üniversitesi Sbf Dergisi, 60 (4), 75-88.
  19. ENDERS, Walter (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series, John Wiley Sons
  20. ERDOĞAN, Savaş (2006), Türkiye’nin İhracat Yapısındaki Değişme Ve Büyüme İlişkisi: Koentegrasyon Ve Nedensellik Testi Uygulaması”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İİBF Dergisi, Sayı 10, Yıl 9, 30-39.
  21. FEDER, Gershon (1983), “On exports and economic growth”, Journal of Development Economics, 12(1- 2), 59- 73.
  22. GERNİ Cevat, EMSAN, Ö. Selçuk ve M. Kemal DEĞER (2008), “İthalata Dayalı İhracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme: 1980-2006 Türkiye Deneyimi”, 2. Ulusal İktisat Kongresi, DEÜ, İzmir.
  23. GUJARATI Damodar N. (1999), Temel Ekonometri, Literatür Yayıncılık.
  24. HALICIOGLU, Ferda (2007), “A Multivariate Causality Analysis of Export and Growth for Turkey”, EERI Research Paper Series, No 5/2007.
  25. HATEMI-J, Abdulnasser (2002), “Export performance and economic growth nexus in Japan: a bootstrap approach”, Japan and the World Economy, 14(1), 25-33.
  26. HENRIQUES, I. ve P. SADORSKY (1996), “Export-led growth or growth driven exports? The Canadian case”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 3,541–555.
  27. HERRERIAS, María J. ve Vicente ORTS (2010), “Is the Export-led Growth Hypothesis Enough to Account for China’s Growth?”, China & World Economy,, 18(4), 34-51.
  28. İSPİR, M. Serdar, AÇIKGÖZ E. Bernur ve Mine YILMAZER (2009), “Türkiye’nin Büyüme Dinamiğinde İhracat Mı İthalat Mı Daha Etkin?” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 59-72.
  29. JIN, Jang C. (2000), “Openness and growth: an interpretation of empirical evidence from East Asian countries”, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development: An International and Comparative Review, 9(1), 5-17.
  30. JOHANSEN, Soren (1988),“Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3) pp. 231-254.
  31. KARAGÖL, Erdal ve Alpaslan SEREL (2005), “Türkiye’de İhracat ve GSMH Arasındaki İlişkinin Kointegrasyon Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi”, İ.Ü.İktisat Fakültesi Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, Cilt:50, 1030-1040.
  32. KARIM, Nesarul (2005), “Export and Industrial Development in Bangladesh: An Econometric Investigation for Two Way Causation”, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (1), 1451
  33. KOTIL, Erdoğan ve Fatih KONUR (2010), “The relationship between growth and foreign trade inTurkey: a Granger causality approach (1989-2007)”, Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 1(6), 32-40.
  34. KRUEGER, Anne O. (1978), Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Develeopment: Liberalization Attempts and Consequences, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
  35. LAWRENCE, Robert Z. ve David E. WEINSTEIN (1999), “Trade and growth: import-led or export-led? Evidence from Japan and Korea”, NBER Working Paper No. 7264.
  36. LORDE, Troy (2011),“Export-led Growth: A Case Study of Mexico”, International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(1), 33-44.
  37. MACKINNON, James G. (1996), “Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests”,Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618.
  38. MAH, Jai S. (2005), “Export expansion, economic growth and causality in China”, Applied Economics Letters, 12:2, 105-107.
  39. MAMUN, K. A. Al ve Hiranya K. NATH (2005), “Export-led growth in Bangladesh: a time series analysis”, Applied Economics Letters, 12, 361–364.
  40. MARIN, Dalia (1992), “Is the Export-Led Growth Hypothesis Valid for Industrialized Countries?”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 678-688.
  41. MOOSA, Imad A. (1999), “Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for Australia?”, Applied Economics, 31(7), 903-906.
  42. OLGUN, Hasan (1979), “1979 Yılında Türk Ekonomisinde Ana Gelişmeler” ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 6 (22-23), 165-199.
  43. PANTULA, Sastry G. (1989), “Testing For Unit Roots in Time Series Data”, Econometric Theory, 5(2), 256–271.
  44. RAM, Rati. (1985), “Exports and economic growth: some additional evidence”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 415-25.
  45. REPPAS, Panayiotis A. ve Dimitris K. CHRISTOPOULOS (2005), “The export-output growth nexus: Evidence from African and Asian countries”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 27,929– 9
  46. SATO, Sumie ve Mototsugu FUKUSHIGE (2007), “The End of Import-Led Growth? North Korean Evidence”, COE 21st Century Center of Excellence Program: Behavioral Macrodynamics based on Surveys and Experiments, Discussion Paper No.223
  47. SHAN, Jordan ve TIAN Gary G. (1998), “Causality Between Exports and Economic Growth: The Empirical Evidence from Shanghai”, Australian Economic Papers, 37(2), 195–202.
  48. SMITH, Emilio J. (2001), “Is The Export-Led Growth Hypothesis Valid For Developing Countries? A Case Study of Costa Rica”, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Policy Issues In International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 7, United Nation Publication, New York and Genevo.
  49. ŞİMŞEK, Muammer (2003), “İhracata Dayalı Büyüme Hipotezinin Türkiye Ekonomisi Verileri ile Analizi, 1960-2002”, D.E.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 18(2), 43-63
  50. TAŞTAN, Hüseyin (2010), “Türkiye’de İhracat, İthalat Ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkilerinin Spektral Analizi”, Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi 2(1), 2010, 87-98. TUNCER, İsmail (2002), “Türkiye’de İhracat, İthalat Ve Büyüme: Toda-Yamamoto Yöntemiyle Granger Nedensellik Analizleri (1980–2000)”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(9), 90– 106.
  51. UDDIN, M. Gazi Salah ve Abdullah M. NOMAN (2009), “Causality between Industrial Production and Exports in Bangladesh”, 2nd International Conference (GBMF) on World Financial Crisis and Global Business Challenges, Senate Bhaban, University of Dhaka, Dhaka.
  52. LUTKEPOHL, Helmut (2007), Univariate Time Series Analysis. In Lütkepohl, Helmut and Markus KRATZIG, (Eds.), Applied Time Series Econometrics (pp. 8-84). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  53. ULLAH, Sami, ZAMAN, B., FAROOQ, M. ve A. JAVID, 2009.“Cointegration and Causality between Exports and Economic Growth in Pakistan, European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 264-272.
  54. YİĞİDİM, Aslan ve Nezir KÖSE (1997), “İhracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki, İthalatın Rolü: Türkiye Örneği (1980-1996)”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım Dergisi, 8 (26), 71-85.
  55. HERRERIAS, María J. ve Vicente ORTS (2010), “Is the Export-led Growth Hypothesis Enough to Account for China’s Growth?”, China & World Economy,, 18(4), 34-51.