SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 657

IMPACT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN EU COUNTRIES AND TURKEY: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

AB ÜLKELERİ ve TÜRKİYE’DE DOLAYLI ve DOLAYSIZ VERGİLERİN GELİR DAĞILIMI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Yunus Emre YAYLA
Gülsüm Gürler HAZMAN
Aysun KARAMIKLI
Pages
9–31
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, according to the causality test results, it is concluded that there is a on e-way relationship from indire ct and direct taxes to income distribution

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the 1929 crisis, the state gained economic and social functions with the understanding of state intervention in the economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the effect of indirect and direct taxes on income distribution in 25 EU countries and Turkey between 2006-2018 was investigated by panel data analysis method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, according to the causality test results, it is concluded that there is a on e-way relationship from indire ct and direct taxes to income distribution
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After the 1929 crisis, the state gained economic and social functions with the understanding of state intervention in the economy. The state tries to provide income distribution justice due to its social function and uses the policy tools it has. In this study, the effect of indirect and direct taxes on income distribution in 25 EU countries and Turkey between 2006-2018 was investigated by panel data analysis method. As a result of the study, it has been determined that direct taxes decrease the unfairness of income distribution and indirect taxes increase. In addition, according to the causality test results, it is concluded that there is a on e-way relationship from indire ct and direct taxes to income distribution

Özet

1929 krizi sonras ı devletin ekonomiye müdahalesi anlay ışının hâkim olmas ı ile birlikte devlet eko- nomik ve sosyal fonksiyonlar kazanmıştır. Devlet, sosyal fonksiyonu gere ği gelir dağılımı adaletini sağlamaya çalışmakta ve bunun için elindeki politika araçlarını kullanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 2006- 2018 yılları arasında 25 AB ülkesi ve Türkiye’de dolaylı ile dolaysız vergilerin gelir dağılımı üzerin- deki etkisi panel veri analizi yöntemiyle araştırılmıştır. Yapılan çalışma sonucunda, dolaysız vergile- rin gelir da ğılımı adaletsizliğini azalttığı, dolaylı vergilerin ise arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, ne- densellik testi sonuçlarına göre dolaylı ile dolaysız vergilerden gelir da ğılımına doğru tek yönlü iliş- kinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

YAYLA, Y. E., HAZMAN, G. G., KARAMIKLI, A. (2022). IMPACT OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT TAXES ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN EU COUNTRIES AND TURKEY: PANEL DATA ANALYSIS. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 657, 9–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/516518

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Albayrak, Özlem (2010), “Redistributive Eff ects of Indirect Taxes in Turkey 2003”, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 123-161.
  2. Alvaredo, Facundo, Chancel, Lucas, Piketty, Thomas, Saez, Emmanuel & Zucman, Gabriel (Eds.) (2018), Dünya E şitsizlik Raporu. 2018, Özet. World Inequality Lab. https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-summary-turkish.pdf, 22. 04. 2020.
  3. Ayyıldız, Fatih Volkan (2017), “Gelir Adaletsizliğinin Sebeplerinin Araştırılması: Ampirik Analiz”, Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 34(34), 131-141.
  4. Balseven, Hale ve Tuğcu, Can Tansel (2017), “Analyzing The Effects Of Fiscal Policy On İncome Distrıbution: A Comparison Between Developed And Developing Countries”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues.7(2), 377-383.
  5. Breusch, Trevor S. & Pagan, Adrian R. (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and İts Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  6. Bükey, Abdullah Miraç & Çetin, Ba şak I şıl. (2017), “Türkiye’de Gelir Dağılımına Etki Eden Faktörlerin En Küçük Ka reler Yöntemi ile Analizi”. Maliye Ara ştırmaları Dergisi. 3(1), 103-117.
  7. Cevik, Mr Serhan & Carolina Correa-Caro (2015), Growing (Un)equal: Fiscal Policy and Income Inequality in China and BRIC+, IMF Working Paper, WP/15/68. Çınar, Serkan (2010), “OECD Ülkelerinde Kişi Ba şına GSYİH Durağan m ı? Panel Veri Analizi”, Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 21(2), 591-601.
  8. Demirgil, Bünyamin (2018), “Vergilerin Gelir Da ğılımı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Ampirik Bir Çalışma”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 118-131.
  9. Drucker, Lev, Krill, Ze'ev & Geva, Assaf (2017), The Impact of Tax Composition on Income Inequality and Economic Growth. August 2017. Ministry of Finance. Publications And Reviews. Economic Data. https://mof.gov.il/en/ Publications AndReviews/EconomicData/DocLib/Article_082017_Eng.pdf, 21.4.2020. Dumitrescu Elena-Ivona & Hurlin, Christophe (2012), “Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panels”, Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  10. Eser, Levent Yahya ve Genç Murat Can (2020), “Gelir ve Servet Üzerinden Al ınan Vergilerin Gelir Dağılımı Üzerindeki Etkisi: OECD Ülkeleri Örneği”, Maliye Dergisi, Ocak-Haziran 2020; 178:224-239 European Commission (2020a), Indirect taxes as % of GDP, DG Taxation and Customs Union, based on Eurostat data, https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/ business/ economic-analysis-taxati