SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

A Serologic Survey of Dirofilariasis, Leishmaniasis, Ehrlichiosis, and Anaplasmosis in Dogs in Siirt Province

Siirt İli Köpeklerinde Dirofilariasis, Leishmaniasis, Ehrlichiosis ve Anaplasmosis Üzerine Serolojik Bir Çalışma

Özgür Yaşar ÇELİK
Burçak ASLAN ÇELİK
Tekin ŞAHİN
Özlem BİÇİCİ
Vedat BALDAZ
Kıvanç İRAK
Memiş BOLACALI
Pages
103–108
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result; it was concluded that protectionand control measures regarding anaplasmosis should be taken.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Canine vector-borne diseases are caused by a wide range of pathogens transmitted by arthropods.The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis antigen andEhrlichia canis, Leishmania infantum, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum/platys antibodies using aRapid test (Anigen Rapid Caniv-4 Leish, Bionote, South Korea).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with atotal of 50 mixed-breed dogs (26 males and 24 females).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result; it was concluded that protectionand control measures regarding anaplasmosis should be taken.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Canine vector-borne diseases are caused by a wide range of pathogens transmitted by arthropods.The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis antigen andEhrlichia canis, Leishmania infantum, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum/platys antibodies using aRapid test (Anigen Rapid Caniv-4 Leish, Bionote, South Korea). The study was conducted with atotal of 50 mixed-breed dogs (26 males and 24 females). Anaplasma phagocytophilum/platysantibodies were detected in 5 of the dogs (10%). None of the tested dogs were positive for D.immitis antigen or L. infantum and E.canis antibodies. As a result; it was concluded that protectionand control measures regarding anaplasmosis should be taken.

Özet

Köpeklerin vektör kaynaklı hastalıklarına arthropodlar tarafından nakledilen oldukça geniş çeşitlilikte patojenler neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı Siirt ili köpeklerinde Dirofilaria immitis antijeni ile Ehrlichia canis, Leishmania infantum ve Anaplasma phagocytophilum/platys antikorlarının hızlı tanı testi (Anigen Rapid Caniv-4 Leish, Bionote, Güney Kore) kullanılarak belirlenmesiydi. Çalışmanın materyalini farklı ırklardan 26 erkek ve 24 dişi olmak üzere toplam 50 köpek oluşturdu. Çalışma sonucunda örneklerin 5 (%10)’inde Anaplasma phagocytophilum/platys antikorları tespit edilirken D. immitis antijeni, L. infantum ve E.canis antikorları tespit edilemedi. Sonuç olarak; anaplazmozis ile ilgili koruma ve kontrol tedbirlerinin alınması gerektiği kanısına varılmıştı

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, Ö. Y., ÇELİK, B. A., ŞAHİN, T., BİÇİCİ, Ö., BALDAZ, V., İRAK, K., BOLACALI, M. (2022). A Serologic Survey of Dirofilariasis, Leishmaniasis, Ehrlichiosis, and Anaplasmosis in Dogs in Siirt Province. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 103–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/514874

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bowman D, Little SE, Lorentzen L, et al. Prevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in the United States: Results of a national clinic-based serologic survey. Vet Parasitol 2009; 1 -2: 138-148
  2. Carrade D, Foley J, Sullivan M, Foley CW, Sykes JE. Spatial distribution of seroprevalence for Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Washington, Oregon, and California. Vet Clin Pathol 2011; 3: 293-302
  3. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Breitschwerdt EB. Managing canine vector-borne diseases of zoonotic concern: Part two. Trends Parasitol 2009; 5: 228-235
  4. Demir A. Erzurum Yöresinde Köpeklerde Dirofilaria İmmitis, Ehrlichia Canis, Borrelia Burgdorferi ve Anaplasma Spp Seroprevalansinin Araştırılması. Master thesis. Erzurum: Ataturk University, 2018
  5. Icen H, Sekin S, Simsek A, et al. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlischia canis, Borrelia burgdorferri infection in Dogs from Diyarbakır in Turkey. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 2011; 4: 371 -378
  6. Vieira AL, Vieira MJ, Oliveira JM, et al. Prevalence of canine heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) disease in dogs of central Portugal. Parasite 2014; 5: 1 -7
  7. Wang S, Zhang N, Zhang Z, et al. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs in Henan province, central China. Parasite 2016; 43-43
  8. Civelek T, Yıldırım A, Ica A. Prevalence of canine heartworm disease in the Gemlik Area, Bursa. Vet Bil Derg 2006; 1 -2: 65-68
  9. Göz Y, Koltas İS, Altug N, et al. Seroprevalance of Dirofilaria immitis in Dogs in Van District. YYÜ Vet Fak Derg 2007; 2: 5-8
  10. Montoya-Alonso JA, Morchón R, Falcón-Cordón Y, et al. Prevalence of heartworm in dogs and cats of Madrid, Spain. Parasites Vector 2017; 1: 354
  11. Rikihisa Y, Ewing S, Fox J, et al. Analyses of Ehrlichia canis and a canine granulocytic Ehrlichia infection. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 1: 143-148
  12. Shaw SE, Day MJ, Birtles RJ, Breitschwerdt EB. Tickborne infectious diseases of dogs. Trends Parasitol 2001; 2: 74-80
  13. Harrus S, Kass PH, Klement E, Waner T. Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis: a retrospective study of 100 cases, and an epidemiological investigation of prognostic indicators for the disease. Vet Rec 1997; 14: 360-363
  14. Rudoler N, Harrus S, Martinez-Subiela S, et al. Comparison of the acute phase protein and antioxidant responses in dogs vaccinated against canine monocytic ehrlichiosis and naive-cha