Journals / Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of Effects of Various Suture Materials on Skin Wound Healing

Deri Yaralarında Çeşitli Dikiş Materyallerinin Yara İyileşmesi Üzerine Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Pages
83–90
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the first group (n=12) international standard 0 silk yarn was used, in the second group (n= 12), international standard 0 polypropylene was used, in the third group (n= 12), medical tissue adhesive was used, in the fourth group (n=12) tissue staples were used, the fifth group is the control group (n= 12) Biochemical results showed that the antioxidant property was better in the adhesive and stapler group (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to evaluations of the effects of silk suture, polypropylene suture, medical tissue adhesives and skin staples on healing in skin wounds created in rats.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 60, 2- months-old winstar albino male rats were used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the first group (n=12) international standard 0 silk yarn was used, in the second group (n= 12), international standard 0 polypropylene was used, in the third group (n= 12), medical tissue adhesive was used, in the fourth group (n=12) tissue staples were used, the fifth group is the control group (n= 12) Biochemical results showed that the antioxidant property was better in the adhesive and stapler group (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to evaluations of the effects of silk suture, polypropylene suture, medical tissue adhesives and skin staples on healing in skin wounds created in rats. A total of 60, 2- months-old winstar albino male rats were used in the study. The subjects were randomly divided into 5 main groups (n=12). Each group was divided into 2 subgroups of 6 units for 7-and 14-day postoperative follow-ups. 6 mg/kg doses xylazin hydrochloride (Rompun of Bayer 23.32 mg/mL) and 85 mg/kg Ketamine hydrochlorur (Ketalar Parke-Davis, 50 mg/mL) were anesthetized with i.m. applications. In the first group (n=12) international standard 0 silk yarn was used, in the second group (n= 12), international standard 0 polypropylene was used, in the third group (n= 12), medical tissue adhesive was used, in the fourth group (n=12) tissue staples were used, the fifth group is the control group (n= 12) Biochemical results showed that the antioxidant property was better in the adhesive and stapler group (P

Özet

Bu çalışmada ratlarda oluşturulan deri yaralarında ipek iplik, polipropilen, tıbbi doku yapıştırıcı ve deri staplelerinin yara iyileşmesi üzerine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Çalışmada toplam 60 adet 2 aylık winstar albino erkek rat kullanıldı. Denekler rastgele 5 ana gruba ayrıldı (n=12). Her bir grup kendi içerisinde 7 ve 14 günlük postoperatif takipleri yapılmak üzere 6’şar adetlik 2 alt gruba ayrıldı. 6 mg/kg dozunda kas içi Xylazine hydrochloride (Rompun, Bayer 23.32 mg/mL) ve 85 mg/kg kas içi ketamin hydrochlorur (Ketalar, Parke-Davis, 50 mg/mL) uygulamaları ile anestezi sağlandı. Birinci grupta (n=12) uluslararası standart 0 ipek iplik kullanıldı, ikinci grupta (n=12) uluslararası standart 0 Polipropilen kullanıldı, üçüncü grupta (n=12) tıbbi doku yapıştırıcı kullanıldı, dördüncü grupta (n=12) doku stapleleri kullanıldı, beşinci grup ise kontrol grubunu oluşturdu (n=12). Biyokimyasal sonuçlar antioksidan özelliğin yapıştırıcı ve stapler grubunda daha iyi olduğunu (P

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLBENAT, Ö., KAYAPINAR, S. D., HAN, M. C., KIZIL, M., ÇERİBAŞI, S. (2022). Comparison of Effects of Various Suture Materials on Skin Wound Healing. Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 2, 83–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/514808

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Köşlü A. Yara iyileşmesinde tarihsel gelişmeler. In: Erdem C, Çelebi CR. (Editörler). Tüm Yönleriyle Yara İyileşmesi. Ankara: Ayrıntı Matbaacılık, 1996
  2. Black JJ. The history of sutures. Nursing Times 1982; 78: 619-623
  3. Teubner E. History of ligation and suture materials. Med Welt 1973; 24: 946-950
  4. İnal S. Ratlarda Ağız Mukozasında Farklı Dikiş Materyallerine Karşı Gelişen Doku Reaksiyonu ve Yara İyileşmesinin İncelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, Samsun; Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2007
  5. Dölenmem, S. Dikiş Materyalleri, Mezuniyet Tezi, İzmir; TC Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Hastalıkları Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, 2000
  6. Greenwald D, Albear P, Gotlieb L. Mechanical Comparison of 10 Suture Materials Before and After in Vivo İncubation. J Surg Res1994; 56: 372-77
  7. Stashak, TS. Equine Wound Management. Malvern, Pennsylvania: Lea& Febiger,1991
  8. Leapar,DJ. Wound closure. EWMA 2001; 1: 19-24
  9. Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin ıncisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. AJVR 2005; 66: 1975-1984
  10. Adanur S, SearsW. Handbook of Industrial Textiles. New York: CRC Press, 1995
  11. Mc Ilwraith CW, Turner AS. Equine Surgery Advanced Techniques. Malvern, Pennsylvania: Lea & Febiger, 1987
  12. Hermann JB. Tensile strength and knot security of surgical suture materials. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1972; 49: 110
  13. Quinn J, Wells G, Sutcliffe T, et al. A randomized trial comparing octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and sutures in the management of lacerations. JAMA 1997; 277:1527-1530
  14. Lloyd JD, Marque MJ III, Kacprowicz RF. Closure techniques. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2007; 25: 73-81
  15. Gündüz A, Durmuş AS, Özkaraca M, Sağlıyan A. Oktilsiyanoakrilat ve fibrin yapıştırıcıların ensizyonel yara iyileşmesi üzerindeki etkileri. FÜ Sağ Bil Vet Derg 2019; 33: 131-137