Journals / Felsefe Dünyası / 2009 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 50

Rene Descartes,John Locke and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz on innate ideas.

Doğuştan düşünceler üzerine Rene Descartes,John Locke ve Gottfried Wilhem Leibniz

Pages
81–110
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, the aim of this study will be to expose the particular value of Leibniz's contribution to this topic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Descartes' Third Meditation, the meditator makes an inventory of the ideas he discovers within him, and observes that some appear to be 'innate', some 'adventitious', and some 'fictitious'.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In.his critique of the innateness doctrine, Locke was to urge the objection that many people like idiots and children seem quite unaware of the relevant truths; yet 'to imprint anything on the Mind without the Mind's perceiving it', he stated, 'seems to me hardly intelligible'.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, the aim of this study will be to expose the particular value of Leibniz's contribution to this topic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In Descartes' Third Meditation, the meditator makes an inventory of the ideas he discovers within him, and observes that some appear to be 'innate', some 'adventitious', and some 'fictitious'. In.his critique of the innateness doctrine, Locke was to urge the objection that many people like idiots and children seem quite unaware of the relevant truths; yet 'to imprint anything on the Mind without the Mind's perceiving it', he stated, 'seems to me hardly intelligible'. Leibniz expresses his view of innateness by claiming that the ideas and truths are innate in us as 'inclinations, dispositions, tendencies or virtualities'. What are the meanings of these statements? The purpose of this article as a whole is to examine from the viewpoint of the analytic history philosophy the doctrine of innateness in the philosophies of Descartes, Locke, and Leibniz. Moreover, the aim of this study will be to expose the particular value of Leibniz's contribution to this topic.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALDIR, H. (2022). Rene Descartes,John Locke and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz on innate ideas.. Felsefe Dünyası, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 50, 81–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/513025

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. 'CB': Descartes' Conversation with Burman, (tr.) J. Cottingham (Oxford:; Clarendon, 1976). 'CSM': The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, (ed. and tr.), John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, cilt I ve II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985). 'CSMK': The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, The Correspondence, (ed. and tr.), John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch and Anthony Kenny, cilt III (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
  2. Bennett, J., Locke, Berkeley, Hume (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971).
  3. Broad, C. D., Leibniz, An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).
  4. Butler, R. J., Cartesian Studies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1972).
  5. Cevizci, Ahmet, Onyedinci Yüzyıl Felsefe Tarihi (Bursa: Asa Kitabevi, 2001).
  6. Copleston, Frederick, Felsefe Tarihi, Kıta Ussalcılığı, Cilt: 4, Bölüm: B, Çev. Aziz Yardımlı (İstanbul: İdea Yayınları, 1991).
  7. Cottingham, John, The Rationalists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).
  8. Descartes, Philosophical Letters, çev. A. Kenny (Oxford: OUP, 1970). http://www.earlyrhoderntexts.com/pdlleibne.pdf http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/leibne2.pdf http://www.scribd.com/doc/4214369/A-Treatise-of-Human-Nature
  9. Hume, David, Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge (2nd edn. Revised P. H. Nidditch, Oxford: Oxford University Pres, 1978).
  10. Lee, H. P. D., Plato's Republic (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1955). Davlef in diğer bir çevirisi: F. M. Cornford (Oxford: Oxford University Pres, 1941).
  11. Leibniz, Philosophical Essays, tr. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989).
  12. Locke, John, Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), tr. P. M. Hidditch (Oxford: Clarendon, 1975).
  13. Locke, John, İnsan Anlığı Üzerine bir Deneme, çev. Vehbi Hacıkadiroğlu (İstanbul: Ara Yayınları, 1992).
  14. Lucas, P. & Grint, L, Leibniz, Discourse on Metaphysics (Manchester: MUP, 1952).
  15. Parkinson, G. H. R., Leibniz: Philosophical Writings (London: 1973).
  16. Priest, Stephen, Theories of the Mind, (London: Penguin Books, 1991).
  17. Rescher, M., The Philosophy of Leibniz (Englevvood Cliffs: Prentice Hail, 1967).
  18. Russell, B., A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz (Cambridge: CUP, 1900; Allen&Unvin,1937).
  19. Sesonske, A & Fleming, N., Plato's Meno (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1965).
  20. Tredennick, H. (çev) Plato, The last Days of Socrates (Harmondsworth: Penguin, rev. 1969.
  21. Bu cilt Euthyphro, Apology, Crito ve Phaedo'yu içerir. Ülken, Hilmi Ziya, Genel Felsefe Dersleri (Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakül