SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of Therapeutics / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Effect of Past and Current Dental Treatment onChildren’s Dental Anxiety Status and OxidativeStress Biomarkers: A Pilot Study

Gül KESKİN
Hasan ULUSAL
Hasan GÜNDOĞAR
Zübeyde UÇAR GÜNDOĞAR
Mehmet ÇİLOĞLU
Pages
282–286
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After the current treatment, a significant decrease in TAC and OSI values was found in G1 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to detect dental anxiety caused by past and current dental treatment in children using saliva biomarkers and to investigate the correlation between these markers and psychometric analysis.Methods: A total of 43 children aged 6–13 years were recruited for this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants were divided into two groups: those with dental treatment experience (G1) and those who presented to the dentist for the first time (G2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After the current treatment, a significant decrease in TAC and OSI values was found in G1 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to detect dental anxiety caused by past and current dental treatment in children using saliva biomarkers and to investigate the correlation between these markers and psychometric analysis.Methods: A total of 43 children aged 6–13 years were recruited for this study. The participants were divided into two groups: those with dental treatment experience (G1) and those who presented to the dentist for the first time (G2). Anxiety scale data and saliva samples were obtained. Oxidative stress (OS) markers, namely, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total oxidant status (TOS), and oxidative stress index (OSI), were analyzed from the saliva samples. After current treatments such as fluoride application or restorative procedures, anxiety scale data, and saliva samples were obtained. Results: TAC and OSI values were higher in G1 than in G2 at baseline (p0.05). After the current treatment, a significant decrease in TAC and OSI values was found in G1 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, G., ULUSAL, H., GÜNDOĞAR, H., GÜNDOĞAR, Z. U., ÇİLOĞLU, M. (2022). Effect of Past and Current Dental Treatment onChildren’s Dental Anxiety Status and OxidativeStress Biomarkers: A Pilot Study. European Journal of Therapeutics, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 282–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/512209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Seligman LD, Hovey JD, Chacon K, Ollendick TH. Dental anxiety: An understudied problem in youth. Clin Psychol Rev 2017; 55: 25-40. [Crossref] 2. Arrow P, Klobas E. Minimal intervention dentistry for early childhood caries and child dental anxiety: a randomized controlled trial. Aust Dent J 2017; 62: 200-7. [Crossref] 3. Kyle BN, McNeil DW, Weaver B, Wilson T. Recall of Dental Pain and Anxiety in a Cohort of Oral Surgery Patients. J Dent Res 2016; 95: 629-34. [Crossref] 4. Lin CS, Wu SY, Yi CA. Association between Anxiety and Pain in Dental Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 153-62. [Crossref] 5. Armfield JM, Heaton LJ. Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: a review. Aust Dent J 2013; 58: 390-407. [Crossref] 6. Paglia L, Gallus S, de Giorgio S, Cianetti S, Lupatelli E, Lombardo G, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian versions of the Children’s Fear Survey Schedule - Dental Subscale and the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2017; 18: 305-12. 7. Kilinç G, Akay A, Eden E, Sevinç N, Ellidokuz H. Evaluation of children’s dental anxiety levels at a kindergarten and at a dental clinic. Braz Oral Res 2016; 2016; 30: e72. [Crossref] 8. De Menezes Abreu DM, Leal SC, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Dental anxiety in 6-7-year-old children treated in accordance with conventional restorative treatment, ART and ultra-conservative treatment protocols. Acta Odontol Scand 2011; 69: 410-6. [Crossref] 9. Esa R, Hashim NA, Ayob Y, Yusof ZY. Psychometric properties of the faces version of the Malay-modified child dental anxiety scale. BMC Oral Health 2015; 15: 28. [Crossref] 10. Majstorovic M, Morse DE, Do D, Lim Ll, Herman NG, Moursi AM. Indicators of dental anxiety in children just prior to treatment. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014; 39: 12-7. [Crossref] 11. Howard KE, Freeman R. Reliability and validity of a faces version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 281-8. [Crossref] 12. Aschbacher K, O’Donovan A, Wolkowitz OM, Dhabhar FS, Su Y, Epel E. Good stress, bad stress and oxidative stress: insights from anticipatory cortisol reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013; 38: 1698-708. [Crossref] 13. Giebułtowicz J, Wroczyński P, Samolczyk-Wanyura D. Comparison of antioxidant enzymes activity and the concentration of uric acid in the saliva of patients with oral cavity cancer, odontogenic cysts and healthy subjects. J Oral Pathol Med 2011; 40: 726-30. [Crossref] 14. Maciejc