SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences / 2026 / Sayı: 66

From pandemic to post-pandemic: Understanding the digital platform usage experiences of older people

Pandemiden post-pandemiye: Yaşlı bireylerin dijital platform kullanım deneyimlerini anlamak

Derya Gül Ünlü(İstanbul University, Faculty of Communication, Department of Public Relations and Publicity)0000-0003-3936-7988
Elif Karakoç Keskin(Yeditepe University, Faculty of Communication, Radio Television and Cinema Department)0000-0002-2831-2247
Pages
183–209
Publication Date
2024-07-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Concerning the ‘reflection of digital platform experiences on daily life practices’ category, 6 positive and 3 negative sub-themes were identified. ‘Increased/accelerated access to information’ among the positive themes and ‘a new addiction’ among the negative themes were the most emphasized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The social isolation experienced during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period has transformed the daily life practices of individuals of all ages and increased their integration into digital platforms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The adoption of digital technologies by elderly users has accelerated, and the digital environment has assumed an important role in meeting various physical and social needs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Concerning the ‘reflection of digital platform experiences on daily life practices’ category, 6 positive and 3 negative sub-themes were identified. ‘Increased/accelerated access to information’ among the positive themes and ‘a new addiction’ among the negative themes were the most emphasized.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yaşlılık · dijital platform · post-pandemi

Abstract

The social isolation experienced during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period has transformed the daily life practices of individuals of all ages and increased their integration into digital platforms. The adoption of digital technologies by elderly users has accelerated, and the digital environment has assumed an important role in meeting various physical and social needs. Although the mandatory physical isolation after the pandemic period has been replaced by measures taken based on individual preference, it is evident that elderly individuals have become much more active users of digital platforms than before. Based on this understanding, this study aims to make visible how individuals aged 65 and over make sense of their digital platform usage experiences in this new period, also called post-pandemic. A phenomenological approach was adopted to conduct semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 22 participants. As a result of the study, 7 positive and 4 negative sub-themes were identified for the category ‘making sense of digital platforms.’ Among these, the sub-themes of ‘informative,’ ‘communication tool,’ and ‘dangerous’ came to the fore. The ‘digital platform experience’ category was divided into 8 positive and 3 negative subthemes. Among the positive sub-themes, ‘receiving news from the environment/ maintaining relationships’ was the most common type of experience, and among the negative ones, ‘criticism’ stood out. Concerning the ‘reflection of digital platform experiences on daily life practices’ category, 6 positive and 3 negative sub-themes were identified. ‘Increased/accelerated access to information’ among the positive themes and ‘a new addiction’ among the negative themes were the most emphasized.

Özet

Pandemi dönemiyle yaşanan sosyal izolasyon süreci, her yaştan bireyin günlük yaşam pratiklerini dönüşüme uğratmış, kullanıcıların dijital platformlara entegrasyonunu artırmıştır. Yaşlı kullanıcıların dijital teknolojileri benimseme süreçleri hızlanmış ve dijital ortam çeşitli fiziksel ve sosyal ihtiyaçların karşılanmasında önemli bir rol üstlenmiştir. Pandemi dönemi sonrasında zorunlu fiziki yalıtılmışlıklar yerini bireysel tercihle alınan önlemlere bırakmış olsa da yaşlı bireylerin öncesine nazaran çok daha aktif kullanıcılara dönüştükleri görülmektedir. Söz konusu odak noktasından yola çıkan çalışma kapsamında, post-pandemi olarak da adlandırılan bu yeni dönemde, 65 yaş ve üzeri bireylerin dijital platform kullanım deneyimlerini nasıl anlamlandırdıklarının görünür kılınması amaçlanmaktadır. Fenomenolojik yaklaşımın benimsendiği araştırmada 22 katılımcıyla yarı yapılandırılmış derinlemesine görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, dijital platformların anlamlandırılma biçimlerine ilişkin 7 olumlu alt temaya, 4 olumsuz alt temaya ulaşılmış; bunlar arasında bilgi verici, haberleşme aracı ve tehlikeli alt teması öne çıkmıştır. Yaşlı kullanıcıların dijital platform deneyimleri 8 olumlu 3 olumsuz alt temaya ayrılmış; olumlular arasında çevreden haber alma/ilişki sürdürme ve olumsuzlar arasında eleştirilme en fazla karşılaşılan deneyim türü olmuştur. Dijital platform deneyimlerinin günlük yaşam pratiklerine yansıma biçimleri için 6 olumlu ve 3 olumsuz alt tema tespit edilmiş; olumlu temalar içinde artan/hızlanan bilgiye erişim, olumsuz temalar arasında yeni bir bağımlılık öne çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünlü, D. G., Keskin, E. K. (2024). From pandemic to post-pandemic: Understanding the digital platform usage experiences of older people. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, Sayı: 66, 183–209. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2024-1287459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (107)

  1. Adnan, M., Kocatürk Kapucu, N., Yakar, A., Köşk, U. C. & Özbek, Ç. (2021). 65 yaş üstü kadınlara dijital yetkinlik kazandırılmasına yönelik bir öğretim tasarımı. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 22(2), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.12984/ egeefd.957120 google scholar
  2. Akbuğa, F. (2023). Yaşlı bireylerin sosyal ağlardaki ‘dijital suskunluğu’. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(62), 328-345. google scholar
  3. Arastaman, G., Öztürk, İ. & Fidan, T. (2018). Nitel araştırmada geçerlik ve güvenirlik: Kuramsal bir inceleme. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 37-75. google scholar
  4. Artan, T. & Urhan, G. (2019). Yaşlıların teknoloji kullanarak ulaşabilecekleri sosyal ağlar ve iletişim teknolojileri. A. Akgül (Ed.), Geronteknoloji (pp. 66-71). Türkiye Klinikleri. google scholar
  5. Arun, Ö., Binark, M., Özsoy-Taylan, D., Kandemir, B. & Şahinkaya, G. (2022). Yaşlıların toplumsal sınıfı, dijital sermaye ve COVID-19 salgınında bağlantıda kalma pratikleri. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 42(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2022.42.2.0016 google scholar
  6. Bal, H. (2016). Nitel Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri (1st ed.). Sentez Yayıncılık. google scholar
  7. Banskota, S., Healy, M. & Goldberg, E.M. (2020). 15 smartphone apps for older adults to use while in isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(3), 514-525. https://doi. org/10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47372 google scholar
  8. Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28. google scholar
  9. Bayram, M.N. & Arıcı, A. (2021). Yaşlılıkta dijital çağı yakalamak. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 21(2), 367-390. https:// doi.org/10.54961/uobild.1038126 google scholar
  10. Bloomberg, L.D. & Volpe, M. (2008). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A roadmap from beginning to end (1st ed.). Sage Publication. google scholar
  11. Broady, T., Chan, A. & Caputi, P. (2010). Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training ans learning. British Journal of Training and Learning, 41, 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00914.x google scholar
  12. Chen, Y.R. & Shulz, P.J. (2016). The effect of information communication technology interventions on reducing social isolation in the elderly: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e4596. https:// doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4596 google scholar
  13. Choi, N.G. & DiNitto, D.M. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHEalth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Reseacrh, 15, e93. google scholar
  14. Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L. & Bryman, A. (2021). Bryman’s social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  15. Creswell, J.W. (2018). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma Deseni. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans.) Siyasal Kitabevi. google scholar
  16. Czaja, N., Fisk, A.D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S.N., Rogers, W.A. & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technological Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333 google scholar
  17. Damant, J., Knapp, M., Freddolino, P. & Lombard, D. (2016). Effects of digital engagement on the quality of life of older people. Health & Social Care in the Community, 25(6), 1679-1703. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12335 google scholar
  18. Demirtaş-Madran, H.A. (2021). Ayrımcılığa Covid-19 sürecinden bir bakış: Temel kuramlar, yaşçılık tartışmaları ve öneriler. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 60, 63-90. https://doi. org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2021-846399 google scholar
  19. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 29-41). Sage Publication. google scholar
  20. Drew, N. (2004). Creating a synthesis of intentionally: The role of the bracketing faciliator. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(3), 215-223. google scholar
  21. Eddles-Hirch, K. (2015). Phenomenology and educational research. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(8), 251-260. google scholar
  22. Ekici, S. K. & Gümüş, Ö. (2016). Yaşlılıkta teknolojinin kullanımı. Ege Tıp Dergisi, 55(0), 26-30. https://doi. org/10.19161/etd.344199 google scholar
  23. Ekoh, P. C., George, E. O., & Ezulike, C. D. (2021). Digital and physical social exclusion of older people in rural Nigeria in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 64(6), 629-642. google scholar
  24. Erdem, T.A. (2022, Nisan, 23-24). Covid-19 sürecinde iletişim kaygısı ile sosyal medya bağımlılığı etkileşimi. 5th International New York Academic Research Congress [Conference]. New York, ABD. google scholar
  25. Flandorfer, P. (2012). Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: The importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. International Journal of Population Research, 13, 1-13. https:// doi.org/10.1155/2012/829835 google scholar
  26. Forsman, A.K., Nordmyr, J., Matosevic, T., Park, A.L., Wahlbeck, K. & McDaid, D. (2018). Promoting mental wellbeing among older people: Technology-based interventions. Health Promotion International, 33, 10421054. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dax047 google scholar
  27. Forsman, A.K. & Nordmyr, J. (2017). Psychosocial links between internet use and mental health in later life: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36, 1471-1518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815595509 google scholar
  28. Fumagalli, E., Dolmatzian, M. & Shrum, L.J. (2021). Centennials, FOMO and loneliness: An inverstigation of the impact of social networking and messaging/VoIP apps usage during the initial stage of Coronavirus pandemic. Frontiers in Pscyhology, 12, 620739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620739 google scholar
  29. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0305-0483(00)00021-9 google scholar
  30. Giasanti, D. & Veltro, G. (2021). The digital divide in the era of COVID-19: An investigation into an important obstacle to the access to the mHealth by the citizen. Healthcare, 9(4), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ healthcare9040371 google scholar
  31. Gibson, A., Bardach, S.H., & Pope, D.N. (2020). COVID-19 and the digital divide: Will social workers help bridge the gap? Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6-7), 671-673. google scholar
  32. Giwa, S., Mullings, D. V., & Karki, K. (2020). Virtual social work care with older black adults: A culturally relevant technology-based intervention to reduce social isolation and loneliness in a time of pandemic. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6-7), 679-681. google scholar
  33. Görgün-Baran, A. (2008). Yaşlılıkta sosyalizasyon ve yaşam kalitesi. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 2, 86-97. google scholar
  34. Heid, A.R., Cartwright, F., Wilson-Genderson, M. & Pruchno, R. (2021). Challenges experienced by older people during the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Gerontologist, 61(1), 48-58. google scholar
  35. Işıkoğlu, N., Özdemir, A.A., Altun, M. & Ergenekon, E. (2021). Erken çocukluk eğitimi öğretmen ve yöneticilerinin Covid-19 pandemi deneyimleri: Yorumlayıcı fenomenolojik bir analiz. Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 5(2), 567-590. google scholar
  36. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N. & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1/2), 45-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019104520776 google scholar
  37. Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publication. google scholar
  38. Hargittai, E. & Micheli, M. (2019). Internet skills and why they matter. M. Graham & W.H. Dutton (Eds.) Society and the Internet: How networks of information and communication are changing our lives (pp. 109-126). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  39. Hawthorn, D. (2007). Interface design and engagement with older people. Behavior and Information Technology, 26(4), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601176930 google scholar
  40. Heart, T. & Kalderon, E. (2013). Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ITC? International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82- e209-e231. google scholar
  41. Hill, R., Betts, L.R., & Gardner, S.E. (2015). Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology:(Dis) empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 415-423. google scholar
  42. Hunsaker, A., Nguyen, M.H., Fuchs, J., Djukaric, T., Hugentobler, L. & Hargittai, E. (2019). “He explained it to me and i also did it myself”: How older adults get support with their technology uses. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 1-13. Https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119887866 google scholar
  43. Kalınkara, V. & Sarı, İ. (2019). Yaşlılarda sosyal ağ kullanımı ve yalnızlık ilişkisinin belirlenmesi. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 12 (1), 8-19. google scholar
  44. Karavidas, M., Lim, N.K., & Katsikas, S.L. (2005). The effects of computers on older adult users. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 697-711. google scholar
  45. Kılıç, N. P., Özdemir, B. P., Gençtürk Hızal, G. S., & Aktaş, M. (2021). Covid-19 pandemisinde iletişimsel ihtiyaçlar, beklentiler ve deneyimler üzerine nitel bir araştırma: 65 yaş ve üzeri Ankara örneklemi. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 60, 127-155. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2021-0744 google scholar
  46. Kleiman, S. (2004). Phenomenology: To wonder and search for meanings. Nurse Researcher, 11(4), 7-19. google scholar
  47. König, R., Seifert, A. & Doh, M. (2018). Internet use among older Europeans: An analysis based on share data. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(3), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5 google scholar
  48. Küçük, O. & Koçak, M.C. (2019). İleri yaş grubu kişilerin internet kullanım alışkanlıkları: Trabzon örneği. Journal of International Social Research, 12(65), 1162-1168. google scholar
  49. Law, E.L. & Abascal, J. (2022). Post-pandemic HCI-living digitally: Well-being-driven digital technologies. Interacting with Computers, 33(4), 331-334. google scholar
  50. Lam, J.C. & Lee, M.K. (2006). Digital inclusiveness-longitudinal study of internet adoption by older adults. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 177-206. google scholar
  51. Lester, S. (1999). An Introduction to Phenomenological Research (1st ed.). Taunton UK: Stan Lester Developments. google scholar
  52. Mace, R.A., Mattos, M.K., & Vranceanu, A.M. (2022). Older adults can use technology: why healthcare professionals must overcome ageism in digital health. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 12(12), 1102-1105. google scholar
  53. Mason, M., Sinclair, D. & Berry, C. (2012). Nudge or compel? Can behavioural economics tackle the digital exclusion of older people? London: The International Longevity Centre-UK. https://ilcuk.org.uk/nudge-or-compel-can-behavioural-economics-tackle-the-digital-exclusion-of-older-people/ google scholar
  54. Merriam, S.B. (2018). Nitel araştırma. (S, Turan & F. Koçak Canbaz, Trans.) Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. google scholar
  55. McMellon, C.A. & Schiffman, L.G. (2002). Cybersenior empowerment: How some older individuals are taking control of their lives. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21, 157-175. google scholar
  56. Micheli, M, Redmiles, E.M. & Hargittai, E. (2019). Help wanted: Young adults’ sources of support for questions about digital media. Information, Communication & Society, 23(11), 1655-1672. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369 118X.2019.1602666 google scholar
  57. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (2016) Nitel veri analizi. (S. Akbaba Altun & A. Ersoy, Trans.) Pegem Akademi. google scholar
  58. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Sage Publication. google scholar
  59. Mitzner, T.L., Boron, J.B., Fausset, C.B., Adams, A.E., Charness, N., Czaja, SJ.,. Sharif, J. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710-1721. https://doi. org//10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020 google scholar
  60. Morse, J.M. (2000). Determinig sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3-5. google scholar
  61. Montealegre, R. (2020). Addresing the role of digital technology in the Covid-19 Recovery. RELCASI, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.17705/1relc.00074 google scholar
  62. Mou, J., Shin, D.H. & Cohen, J.F. (2017). Trust and risk in acceptance of e-services. Electronic Commerce Research, 17(2), 255-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9205-4 google scholar
  63. Nahm, E.S. (2003). A model of computer-mediated social support among older adults. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] University of Maryland Baltimora ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. google scholar
  64. Nimrod, G. (2020). Changes in internet use when coping with stress: Older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(10), 1020-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jagp.2020.07.010 google scholar
  65. Oppenauer, C. (2009). Motivation and needs for technology use in old age. Gerontechnology, 8(2), 82-87. https:// doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.006.00 google scholar
  66. Özsirkecioğlu, G. (2022). 65 yaş üstü bireylerin pandemi dönemi ile değişen iletişim pratikleri (Sakarya ili örneği) [Unpublished master dissertation]. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
  67. Özsungur, F. (2018). Yaşlıların teknoloji kabul ve kullanım davranışlarının başarılı yaşlanma üzerindeki etkilerinin analizi: Adana ili örneği [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. google scholar
  68. Patton, M.Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans.) Pegem Akademi. google scholar
  69. Pavlou, P.A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1086 4415.2003.11044275 google scholar
  70. Pettigrew, S. & Roberts, M. (2008). Addressing loneliness in later life. Aging and Mental Health, 12(3), 302-309. google scholar
  71. Pfiel, U., Zaphiris, P. & Wilson, S. (2009). Older adults’ perceptions and experience of online social support. Interacting with Computers, 21, 159-172. google scholar
  72. Ramirez-Correa, P., Grandon, E.E., Ramirez-Santana, M., Arenas-Gaita, J. & Rondan-Cataluna, F.J. (2023). Explaining the consumption technology acceptance in the elderly post-pandemic: effort expectancy does not matter. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020087 google scholar
  73. Robson, C. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri gerçek dünya araştırmaları. (Ş. Çınkır & N. Demirkasımoğlu, Trans.) Anı Yayıncılık. google scholar
  74. Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Khilnani, A., Ono, H., Cotten, S.R., McClain, N.,. Tolentino, N. (2020). Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk profiles and new forms of vulnerability. First Monday, 25(7), 1-34. google scholar
  75. Rorai, V., & Perry, T. E. (2020). An Innovative telephone outreach program to seniors in Detroit, a city facing dire consequences of COVID-19. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6-7), 713-716. google scholar
  76. Rose, P., Beeby, J. & Parker, D. (1995). Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing in nursing. Journal ofAdvanced Nursing, 21(6), 1123-1129. google scholar
  77. Salanova, M., Grau, R.M., Cifre, E. & Liorens, S. (2000). Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: The moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(6), 575-590. google scholar
  78. Sayin-Kasar, K., & Karaman, E. (2021). Life in lockdown: Social isolation, loneliness and quality of life in the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Geriatric Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gerinurse.2021.03.010 google scholar
  79. Seggie, F.N. & Bayyurt, Y. (2017). Nitel araştırma yöntemi. F. N. Seggie & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.). Nitel araştırma: Yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımları (pp. 11-22). Anı Yayıncılık. google scholar
  80. Seifert, A. (2020). The digital exclusion of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6-7), 674-676. google scholar
  81. Sinav, A. (2020). Genç-yaşlı, orta-yaşlı ve ileri-yaşlı bireylerin sosyal medya kullanım davranışlarının karşılaştırmalı analizi: Eskişehir ili örneği. Etkileşim, 5, 116-145. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2020.5.87 google scholar
  82. Sinav, A. (2020). Sosyal medya ve yaşlı kullanıcılar: Kullanımlar ve doyumlar yaklaşımı çerçevesinde bir araştırma. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 97-125. google scholar
  83. Sixsmith, A., Horst, R.B., Simenov, D. & Mihailidis, A. (2022). Older people’s use of digital technology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 42 (1-2), 3-53. https://doi. org/10.1177/02704676221094731 google scholar
  84. Smith, J.A., Flowers, P. & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theoty, method and research (1st ed.). Sage Publication. google scholar
  85. Stake, E.R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research (1st ed.). Sage Publication. google scholar
  86. Starks, H. & Brown-Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372-1380. google scholar
  87. Sum, S., Mathews, R.M., Hughes, I. & Campbell, A. (2008). Internet use and loneliness in older adults. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 208-211. google scholar
  88. Szabo, A., Allen, J., Stephens, C. & Alpass, F. (2019). Longitudinal analysis of the relationship between purposes of internet use and well-being among older adults. The Gerontologist, 59, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ geront/gny036 google scholar
  89. Tekindal, M. & Uğuz-Arsu, Ş. (2020). Nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak fenomenolojik yaklaşımın kapsamı ve sürecine yönelik bir derleme. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 20(1), 153-182. google scholar
  90. Thomas, P.A. (2010). Is it better to give or receive? Social support and the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(3), 351-357. google scholar
  91. Tutar, H. (2023). Nitel araştırma deseni belirleme ölçütleri ve gerekçelendirilmesi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 334-355. google scholar
  92. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2021, 18 Mart). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması, istatistiklerle yaşlılar, 2020. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2020-37227 google scholar
  93. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. (2022, 18 Mart). Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması, istatistiklerle yaşlılar, 2021. shorturl.at/cqsKT google scholar
  94. Tyler, M., George-Walker, L.D. & Simic, V. (2020). Motivation matters: Older adults and information communication technologies. Studies in the Education of Adults, 52(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2020.1731 058 google scholar
  95. Van Deursen, A. & Helsper, E.J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/026732311557805 google scholar
  96. Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2006). Digital divide research achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4-5), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004 google scholar
  97. Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice, 1(1), 11-30. https://doi.org 10.29173/pandpr19803 google scholar
  98. Vaportzis, E., Clausen, M.G. & Gow, A.J. (2017). Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: A focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2017.01687 google scholar
  99. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K. & Head, M. (2010). Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. google scholar
  100. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 870-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029 google scholar
  101. White, H., McConnell, E., Clipp, E., Branch, L.G., Sloane, R., Pieper, C. & Box, T.L. (2002). A randomized controlled trial of the psychological impact of providing internet training and Access to older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 6(3), 213-221. google scholar
  102. Wilson, A. (2015). A guide to phenomenological research. Nursing Standard, 29(34), 38-43. google scholar
  103. Winstead, V., Anderson, W.A., Yost, E.A., Cotton, S.R., Warr, A. & Berkowsky, R.W. (2013). You can teach an old dog new tricks: A qualitative analysis of how residents of senior living communities may use the web to overcome spatial and social berriers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 32, 540-560. google scholar
  104. Xie, B., Charness, N., Fingerman, K., Kaye, J., Kim, M. T. & Khurshid, A. (2020). When going digital becomes a necessity: Ensuring older adults’ needs for information, services, and social inclusion during COVID-19. Journal of Aging &Social Policy, 32(4-5), 460-470. google scholar
  105. Zhang, Q., Guo, X. & Vogel, D. (2021). Information and communication technology use for life satisfaction among the elderly: A motivation perspective. American Journal of Health Behavior, 45(4), 701-710. https://doi. org/10.5993/AJHB.45.4.9 google scholar
  106. Mitzner, T.L., Boron, J.B., Fausset, C.B., Adams, A.E., Charness, N., Czaja, SJ.,. Sharif, J. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710-1721. https://doi. org//10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020 google scholar
  107. Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Khilnani, A., Ono, H., Cotten, S.R., McClain, N.,. Tolentino, N. (2020). Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk profiles and new forms of vulnerability. First Monday, 25(7), 1-34. google scholar