Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Risk factors and Incidence of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Hospital ICU

Pages
32–36
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Risk factors independentlyassociated with CRBSI were diabetes mellitus, long duration of catheterization, length of stay ICU and parenteral nutrition.The most common pathogens were Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and Candida albicans.Conclusion: In our study, it was concluded that the duration of catheterization and the time of parenteral nutritiontreatment should be as short as possible.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in intensivecare unit (ICU) patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of this study was to assess the risk factors and incidence of catheter-relatedbloodstream infections in our hospital ICU.Methods: Over twelve months, a prospective observational study was performed in a 27-bed anesthesia-resuscitationand ICU, located in a 1000-bed education research hospital at Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Risk factors independentlyassociated with CRBSI were diabetes mellitus, long duration of catheterization, length of stay ICU and parenteral nutrition.The most common pathogens were Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and Candida albicans.Conclusion: In our study, it was concluded that the duration of catheterization and the time of parenteral nutritiontreatment should be as short as possible.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in intensivecare unit (ICU) patients. The objective of this study was to assess the risk factors and incidence of catheter-relatedbloodstream infections in our hospital ICU.Methods: Over twelve months, a prospective observational study was performed in a 27-bed anesthesia-resuscitationand ICU, located in a 1000-bed education research hospital at Turkey. CRBSIs were recorded and analyzed.Results: Three-hundred seventeen patients were evaluated, and a total of 433 central venous catheters (CVCs) were insertedfor a duration >48 h. Patients' median age was 66 (IQRs=56-77), and 56.8% were male. The incidence of CRBSIwas 8.2 per 1000 catheter days. No significant relationship was found between several parameters: 1) age; 2) gender; 3)comorbid conditions; 4) catheter insertion site; and 5) main reason for ICU admission (p>0.05). Risk factors independentlyassociated with CRBSI were diabetes mellitus, long duration of catheterization, length of stay ICU and parenteral nutrition.The most common pathogens were Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and Candida albicans.Conclusion: In our study, it was concluded that the duration of catheterization and the time of parenteral nutritiontreatment should be as short as possible. In addition, an association between CRBSIs and prolonged ICU stay andmortality was observed.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKEN, M., TOKER, A. K., ZİNCİROĞLU, Ç., KÖSE, Ş. (2022). Risk factors and Incidence of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Hospital ICU. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 32–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/508745

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Hajjej Z, Nasri M, Sellami W, Gharsallah H, Labben I, Ferjani M. Incidence, risk factors and microbiology of central vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection in an intensive care unit. J Infect Chemother 2014;20:163–8
  2. Shapey IM, Foster MA, Whitehouse T, Jumaa P, Bion JF. Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: improving post-insertion catheter care. J Hosp Infect 2009;71:117–22
  3. Dreesen M, Foulon V, Spriet I, Goossens GA, Hiele M, De Pourcq L, et al. Epidemiology of catheter-related infections in adult patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: a systematic review. Clin Nutr 2013;32:16–26
  4. Peng S, Lu Y. Clinical epidemiology of central venous catheterrelated bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit in China. J Crit Care 2013;28:277–83
  5. National Hospital Infections Surveillance Network (UHESA) Report Summary Data. Turkey: 2015
  6. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance S. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–85
  7. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;49:1–45
  8. Galpern D, Guerrero A, Tu A, Fahoum B, Wise L. Effectiveness of a central line bundle campaign on line-associated infections in the intensive care unit. Surgery 2008;144:492–5
  9. Leistner R, Hirsemann E, Bloch A, Gastmeier P, Geffers C. Costs and prolonged length of stay of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CVC BSI): a matched prospective cohort study. Infection 2014;42:31–6
  10. Goede MR, Coopersmith CM. Catheter-related bloodstream infection. Surg Clin North Am 2009;89:463–74
  11. Yilmaz G, Koksal I, Aydin K, Caylan R, Sucu N, Aksoy F. Risk factors of catheter-related bloodstream infections in parenteral nutrition catheterization. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2007;31:284–7
  12. Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, Minard G, Tolley EA, Poret HA, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg 1992;215:503–11
  13. Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Mimoz O. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 2010;14:212
  14. Eggimann P, Harbarth S, Constantin MN, Touvene