Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Comparing the Efficiencies of Ultrasound and Phonophoresis with Mucopolysaccharide Polysulphate Treatments in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Pages
320–326
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Significant decreases in cross-sectional area in MR measurements were observed at two levels (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare different conservative treatments in patients with carpaltunnel syndrome.Methods: Forty patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were included in the present quasi-experimentalstudy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were randomized into phonophoresis (n=20 hands) and ultrasound (n=20 hands) groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Significant decreases in cross-sectional area in MR measurements were observed at two levels (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare different conservative treatments in patients with carpaltunnel syndrome.Methods: Forty patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were included in the present quasi-experimentalstudy. Patients were randomized into phonophoresis (n=20 hands) and ultrasound (n=20 hands) groups. Phonophoresis group had phonophoresis treatment at the rate of 1.5 w/cm2 with mucopolysaccharide polysulphate (MPS) gelas conductivity agent, while ultrasound group had ultrasound treatment at the rate of 1.5 w/cm2 only. Both groupsreceived hand-wrist orthosis, tendon and nerve gliding exercises. All patients were evaluated based on physical examination findings, electroneurophysiological parameters, MR imaging, visual analoge scale, Algometer, Jamar HandDynamometer and Boston Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale at the beginning of and three months after thetreatment.Results: Based on clinical findings, significant improvements were observed in both groups for all symptoms except forhand grip strength in phonophoresis group and except for hand grip strength and motor deficit in ultrasound group.While median nerve conduction velocity increased in both groups (p=0.001 for phonophoresis group and p=0.229 forultrasound group), significant improvement in electromyography staging was observed only in phonophoresis group(p=0.037). Significant decreases in cross-sectional area in MR measurements were observed at two levels (p

🔖

Cite This Article

OKAN, S., İNANIR, A., ÇELİKYAY, F., CEVİK, B. (2022). Comparing the Efficiencies of Ultrasound and Phonophoresis with Mucopolysaccharide Polysulphate Treatments in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 320–326. https://ajindex.com/articles/650401

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aroori S, Spence RA. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Ulster Med J. 2008;77:6–17
  2. Koyuncuoglu HR, Kutluhan S, Yesildag A, Oyar O, Guler K, Ozden A. The value of ultrasonographic measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with negative electrodiagnostic tests. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:365–369
  3. Gerritsen AA, de Krom MC, Struijs MA, Scholten RJ, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J neurol 2002;249:272–280
  4. Keith MW, Masear V, Amadio PC, Andary M, Barth RW, Graham B et al. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. JAAOSJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2009;17:397–405
  5. Bakhtiary AH, Fatemi E, Emami M, Maleak M. Phonophoresis of dexamethasone sodium phosphate may manage pain and symptoms of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin J Pain 2013;29:348–53
  6. Ay S, Doğan ŞK, Evcik D, Başer ÖÇ. Comparison the efficacy of phonophoresis and ultrasound therapy in myofascial pain syndrome. Rheumatol Int 2011;31:1203–8
  7. Deshpande MM, Patil CB. Heelpain and phonophoresis. J Indian Med Assoc 2010;108:365
  8. Wehbe MA, Hunter JM. Flexor tendon gliding in the hand. Part II. Differential gliding.J Hand Surg 1985;10:575–9
  9. Totten PA, Hunter JM. Therapeutic techniques to enhance nerve gliding in thoracic outlet syndrome and carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 1991;7:505–20. 10. de Carvalho Leite JC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F: A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:78
  10. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75:1585–92
  11. Sezgin M, Incel NA, Sevim S, Çamdeviren H, As İ, Erdoğan C. Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: Reliability and functionality of the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:1281–6
  12. Aulisa L, Tamburrelli F, Padua R, Romanini E, Monaco ML, Padua L. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; indication for surgical treatment based on electrophysiologic study. J Hand Surg 1998;23:687–91
  13. Burke DT, Burke MM, Stewart GW, Cambre A. Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome: In search of the optimal angle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1241–4
  14. Gerritsen AA, Korthals-de Bos IBC, Laboyrie PM, de Vet H