SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The Most Cited Articles on ECMO: A Life-Saving Bibliometric Analysis

Mehmet DOKUR
Suna KOÇ
Emine PETEKKAYA
Canan GUNDUZ
Pages
99–105
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The majorityof the articles were published in the Intensive Care Medicine (n=15) and was followed by Annals of Thoracic Surgery(n=11) and Circulation (n=7).Conclusion: Although ECMO currently is defined as an effective life supporting tool for patients with reversiblecardiac and pulmonary failure; there has been tremendous differences since the first use of ECMO in means of technology and indicated diseases as well as patient groups over time.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation or ECMO, currently is a life-saving intervention in patients withsevere respiratory and cardiac failures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present bibliometric study was to evaluate the characteristics ofthe most influential articles on ECMO.Methods: In the retrospective clinical study, the search term “ECMO” was queried into Thomson Reuter’s Web of Sciencedatabase between years 1975-2019 to list all the articles on this term.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The majorityof the articles were published in the Intensive Care Medicine (n=15) and was followed by Annals of Thoracic Surgery(n=11) and Circulation (n=7).Conclusion: Although ECMO currently is defined as an effective life supporting tool for patients with reversiblecardiac and pulmonary failure; there has been tremendous differences since the first use of ECMO in means of technology and indicated diseases as well as patient groups over time.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation or ECMO, currently is a life-saving intervention in patients withsevere respiratory and cardiac failures. The aim of the present bibliometric study was to evaluate the characteristics ofthe most influential articles on ECMO.Methods: In the retrospective clinical study, the search term “ECMO” was queried into Thomson Reuter’s Web of Sciencedatabase between years 1975-2019 to list all the articles on this term. The top 100 cited articles were analyzed by topic,journal, author, year, institution, level of evidence, Adjusted Citation Index.Results: Out of screened 46.606 articles on ECMO, an analysis of the most cited articles among these results was performed. The analyzed articles had a median (IQR) 109 (82-1273) citation. Out of Top 100 cited articles, 58 of them hadmore than 100 citations. There was an increasing trend in number of publications on ECMO between years 2009-2014.In the Top 100cited articles list, 94 were clinical research studies, 5 were reviews and 1 article was an expert commiteereport. The majority of the clinical research articles were retrospective comparative clinical studies (n=37). The majorityof the articles were published in the Intensive Care Medicine (n=15) and was followed by Annals of Thoracic Surgery(n=11) and Circulation (n=7).Conclusion: Although ECMO currently is defined as an effective life supporting tool for patients with reversiblecardiac and pulmonary failure; there has been tremendous differences since the first use of ECMO in means of technology and indicated diseases as well as patient groups over time.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOKUR, M., KOÇ, S., PETEKKAYA, E., GUNDUZ, C. (2022). The Most Cited Articles on ECMO: A Life-Saving Bibliometric Analysis. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 99–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/650399

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mosier JM, Kelsey M, Raz Y, Gunnerson KJ, Meyer R, Hypes CD et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for critically ill adults in the emergency department: history, current applications, and future directions. Crit Care 2015;19:431
  2. GIBBON JH Jr. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 1954;37:171–85; passim
  3. Zapol WM, Snider MT, Hill JD, Fallat RJ, Bartlett RH, Edmunds EJMI 105 LH, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure. A randomized prospective study. JAMA 1979;242:2193–6
  4. Morris AH, Wallace CJ, Menlove RL, Clemmer TP, Orme JF Jr, Weaver LK, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation and extracorporeal CO2 removal for adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149(2 Pt 1):295–305
  5. Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Jefferies MR, Huxtable RF, Haiduc NJ, Fong SW. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cardiopulmonary support in infancy. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976;22:80–93
  6. Peek GJ, Clemens F, Elbourne D, Firmin R, Hardy P, Hibbert C, et al. CESAR: conventional ventilatory support vs extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:163
  7. Zhan QY, Sun B, Tong ZH, Guo LM, Xu L, Zhu X, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2011;91:3262–6
  8. Bizzarro MJ, Conrad SA, Kaufman DA, Rycus P; Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Task Force on Infections, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Infections acquired during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates, children, and adults (ELSO guidelines for ECMO centers). Pediatr Crit Care Med 2011;12:277–81
  9. La Torre G, Sciarra I, Chiappetta M, Monteduro A. New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama. Clin Ter 2017;168:e65–e71
  10. Liu L, Li Y, Zhang G-S, Wu J-Y, Majithia S, Tham Y-C, et al. Top 100 cited articles in ophthalmic epidemiology between. Int J Ophthalmol 2006;11:1994–8
  11. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB 2008;22:338–42
  12. Avaible from https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-100-a-handbookfor-patient-and-carer-representatives.html. Healthcare Improvement Scotland (last access date: 19.09.2019)
  13. Harbour R, M