Journals / Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The Prognostic Value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with ALKRearrangement

Pages
134–139
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The progressionfreesurvival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) differences between SII low and high groupshave investigated The correlation between SII and PFS was also evaluated.Results: Totally, 50 patients enrolled to study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: EML4-ALK rearrangement is found in a small group of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:SII was calculated by using formula as follow: (Neutrophil x platelet) / lymphocyte.The cut-off value was accepted as 640 and the patients stratified according to SII level as low and high.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The progressionfreesurvival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) differences between SII low and high groupshave investigated The correlation between SII and PFS was also evaluated.Results: Totally, 50 patients enrolled to study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: EML4-ALK rearrangement is found in a small group of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this patientpopulation, the search of the predictive and prognostic biomarkers have been still continuing. Systemic immune-inflammationindex (SII) is a novel marker for reflection of the inflammatory condition of the human body. So, we aimedthat evaluated the prognostic value of SII in NSCLC with ALK rearrangement.Methods: The patients who diagnosed advanced NSCLC with ALK rearrangement and received crizotinib at any-lineof treatment were enrolled to study. SII was calculated by using formula as follow: (Neutrophil x platelet) / lymphocyte.The cut-off value was accepted as 640 and the patients stratified according to SII level as low and high. The progressionfreesurvival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR) differences between SII low and high groupshave investigated The correlation between SII and PFS was also evaluated.Results: Totally, 50 patients enrolled to study. Twenty-eight of 50 were stratified to SII high group and 22 of 50 to SII lowgroup. Median follow-up time from diagnosis was 25 months. Median PFS was significantly longer in SII low group thanSII high group (24.01 vs. 7.8 months; p=0.024). Overall survival was also significantly longer in SII low group comparewith SII high group (NR vs. 29.08 months; p=0.001). the significantly negative correlation between PFS and SII was alsodetected (r=-0.355; p=0.011).Conclusion: SII, a non-invasive, easily accessible - assessable marker, can be used as a prognostic marker in NSCLC withALK-rearrangement, according to results of our study.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, B., YÜCEL, Ş. (2022). The Prognostic Value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with ALKRearrangement. Eurasian Journal of Medical Investigation, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 134–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/508647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Chiarle R, Voena C, Ambrogio C, Piva R, Inghirami G. The anaplastic lymphoma kinase in the pathogenesis of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2008
  2. 11–23. [CrossRef ] 2. Ziogas DC, Tsiara A, Tsironis G, Lykka M, Liontos M, Bamias A, et al. Treating ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Transl Med 2018
  3. [CrossRef ] 3. Shaw AT, Kim DW, Nakagawa K, Seto T, Crino L, Ahn MJ, et al. Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2013
  4. 2385–94. [CrossRef ] 4. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2014
  5. 2167–77. [CrossRef ] 5. Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Gadgeel S, Ahn JS, Kim DW, et al. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non- Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2017
  6. 829–38. 6. Camidge DR, Kim HR, Ahn MJ, Yang JC, Han JY, Lee JS, et al. Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med 2018
  7. 2027–39. [CrossRef ] 7. Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, Felip E, Soo RA, Camidge DR, et al. Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2018
  8. 1654–67. [CrossRef ] 8. Novello S, Mazieres J, Oh IJ, de Castro J, Migliorino MR, Helland A, et al. Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study. Ann Oncol 2018
  9. 1409–16. [CrossRef ] 9. Shaw AT, Kim TM, Crino L, Gridelli C, Kiura K, Liu G, et al. Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, openlabel, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017
  10. 874–86. [CrossRef ] 10. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 2008
  11. 436–44. [CrossRef ] 11. Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol 2014
  12. e493–503. [CrossRef ] 12. Li X, Dai D, Chen B, Tang H, Xie X, Wei W. The value of neutrophil- to-lymphocyte ratio for response and prognostic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer 2018
  13. 861–71. [CrossRef ] 13. Akinci Ozyurek B, Sahin Ozdemirel T, Buyukyaylaci Ozden S, Erdogan Y, Kaplan B, Kaplan T. Prognostic Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Rati