Journals / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Correlates of Listening Comprehension in L1 and L2: A Meta-analysis

Pages
353–383
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this regard, the overall average correlation scores, obtained from severalprimary studies retrieved from several databases, between linguistic (vocabulary size, vocabulary depth,syntactic knowledge), cognitive (working memory, metacognitive skills), and affective factors (anxietyand self-concept) and oral comprehension were measured.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the correlates of listening comprehension in first (L1) andsecond language (L2).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results of the analysis revealed that interms of strengths of association with listening comprehension, linguistic correlates were superior tocognitive correlates in L2 listening comprehension.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this regard, the overall average correlation scores, obtained from severalprimary studies retrieved from several databases, between linguistic (vocabulary size, vocabulary depth,syntactic knowledge), cognitive (working memory, metacognitive skills), and affective factors (anxietyand self-concept) and oral comprehension were measured.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the correlates of listening comprehension in first (L1) andsecond language (L2). In this regard, the overall average correlation scores, obtained from severalprimary studies retrieved from several databases, between linguistic (vocabulary size, vocabulary depth,syntactic knowledge), cognitive (working memory, metacognitive skills), and affective factors (anxietyand self-concept) and oral comprehension were measured. The results of the analysis revealed that interms of strengths of association with listening comprehension, linguistic correlates were superior tocognitive correlates in L2 listening comprehension. There existed positive correlations with large effectsizes between vocabulary and grammar knowledge and listening comprehension while working memoryyielded a positive correlation with a small effect size. Metacognitive skills, on the other hand,demonstrated a positive correlation with L2 listening comprehension with a large effect size. A similarpattern was observed in L1 listening comprehension with smaller strengths of association. Vocabularyand grammar knowledge yielded positive correlations with L1 listening comprehension and the effect sizewas medium while working memory weakly correlated with listening comprehension. An importantdistinction between L1 and L2 listening comprehension was observed in the affective domain. Anxietyand self-concept which were not reported to correlate with L1 listening comprehension were found todisplay large correlations with listening comprehension in L2. Overall, it was found that listeningcomprehension in both L1 and L2 is a multi-faceted process with different types of components involved.

🔖

Cite This Article

Merç, A., Karalık, T. (2022). Correlates of Listening Comprehension in L1 and L2: A Meta-analysis. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 353–383. https://ajindex.com/articles/507011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Adams, A. M., Bourke, L., & Willis, C. (1999). Working memory and spoken language comprehension in young children. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 364-373. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/002075999399701 *Amin, I. A. R., Aly, M. A. S., & Mohammed, A. M. (2012). A correlation study between EFL strategic listening and listening comprehension skills among secondary school students. Benha Faculty of Education Journal, 23(1), 1-26.
  2. Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem? In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1– 24). London: Longman. Al Seyabi, F., & Tuzlukova, V. (2014). Writing Problems and Strategies: An Investigative Study in the Omani School and University Context. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 3(4), 37-48. *Andersson, U. (2010). The contribution of working memory capacity to foreign language comprehension in children. Memory, 18, 458-472. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/09658211003762084 *Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non‐native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49-78. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467- 9922.2012.00706.x *Atasheneh, N., & Izadi, A. (2012). The role of teachers in reducing/increasing listening comprehension test anxiety: A case of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5, 178-187. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5539/elt.v5n3p178 Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 Beal, V. (2007). The weight of involvement load in college level reading and vocabulary tasks (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Concordia University CLUES Library Catalogue (LE 3 C66E38M 2007 B43) Bensoussan, M., & Ramraz, R. (1984). Testing EFL reading comprehension using a multiplechoice rational cloze. Modern Language Journal, 68, 230–239. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1984.tb01569.x *Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14-31. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033 *Brunfaut, T., & Révész, A. (2015). The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. Tesol Quarterly, 49(1), 141-168. *Call, M. E. (1985). Auditory short-term memory, listening comprehension, and