SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The Relations between Public and Private Sector Wages in Turkey for 1963-2006 Period: An Empirical Analysis

Türkiye’de 1963-2006 Döneminde Kamu ve Özel Sektör Ücretleri Üzerine Bir Ampirik Uygulama

H. Kürşad ASLAN
Murat ASLAN
Pages
23–45
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the study shows that three wages do not diverge from each other in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:By employing Scandinavian wage determination model as the theoretical reference, this study by using maximum likelihood cointegration approach investigates long run relationship between public officials, public sector workers and private sector workers wages in Turkey for 1963–2006 period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cointegration analysis finds one common trend among these wages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the study shows that three wages do not diverge from each other in the long run.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

By employing Scandinavian wage determination model as the theoretical reference, this study by using maximum likelihood cointegration approach investigates long run relationship between public officials, public sector workers and private sector workers wages in Turkey for 1963–2006 period. The cointegration analysis finds one common trend among these wages. Weak-exogeneity test shows that all the wages are endogenous variables. In other words, this study concludes that the private sector’s wage leadership main assumption of the Scandinavian model is not a valid assumption for Turkish case. Finally, the study shows that three wages do not diverge from each other in the long run.

Özet

İskandinav ücret modelinden hareket eden bu çalışma, maksimum olabilirlik temelli eş-bütünleşme yaklaşımını kullanarak 1963–2006 döneminde Türkiye’de kamu işçi, memur ve özel sektör işçi ücretleri arasındaki uzun dönem ilişkiyi araştırmıştır. Yapılan eş-bütünleşme analizi bu ücretler için bir adet “ortak yörünge” tespit etmiştir. Yapılan “zayıf dışsalık” analizi tüm ücretlerin içsel değişken olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu bağlamda bu çalışma İskandinav modelinde lider ücret olarak vurgulanan ve diğer sektör ücretleri tarafından takip edilen özel sektör ücretlerinin Türkiye için doğru olmadığını tespit etmiştir. Bu çalışma son olarak uzun dönemde bu üç ücretin birbirlerinden uzaklaşmama eğiliminde olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, H. K., ASLAN, M. (2022). The Relations between Public and Private Sector Wages in Turkey for 1963-2006 Period: An Empirical Analysis. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 23–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/506117

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Alesina, A., Reza B., ve William, E. (1998).
  2. Redistributive Public Employment, NBER Working Paper 6746. Bulutay, T.(1995). An Overview of the Recent Trends in Labor Markets, Labor Statistics, Ankara:
  3. State Institute of Statistics. DPT (2007). Ekonomik ve Sosyal Göstergeler (1950-2006). http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/ekonomi/gosterge/tr/esg.asp
  4. Engle, R.F. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Co-Integration And Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica 55, 251-276.
  5. Friberg, K. (2003). Intersectoral Wage Linkages in Sweden, Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper Series, Nr. 158, Stockholm, Sweden. Granger, C.W.J. ve Newbold, P. (1974).
  6. Spurious Regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 2 (2), 111-120.
  7. Holmlund, B. ve Ohlsson, H. (1992). Wage Linkages Between Private and Public Sectors in Sweden, Labour 6(2),3-17.
  8. Johansen, K. ve Strom, B. ( 2001). Wages and Politics: Evidence from the Norwegian Public Sector, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, Vol. 63(3), 311-331.
  9. Johansen, S. ve Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (2), 169–210.
  10. Johansen, S. (1992). Determination of Cointegrating Rank in the Presence of a Linear Trend, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54, 383–397.
  11. Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregres-sive Models, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Jacobson, T. ve Ohlsson, H. (1994). Long-Run Relations between Private and Public Sector Wages in Sweden, Empirical Economics 19, 343–360.
  13. Lindquist, J.M. ve Vilhelmsson, R. (2006). Is The Swedish Central Government A Wage Leader? Applied Economics, (38), 1617-1625.
  14. Maysami, R. C. ve Koh, T. S. (2000). A Vector Error Correction Model of The Singapore Stock Market, International Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 9, Issue 1,79-96.
  15. Nymoen, R. (1989). Modeling Wages in the Small Open Economy; An Error Correction Model of Norwegian Manufacturing Wages, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 51,239-258.
  16. OECD (2008). Employment in Government in the Perspective of the Production Costs of Goods and Services in the Public Domain, GOV/PGC/PEM, 2008-1. Tägtström, S. (2000). The Wage Spread Between Different Sectors in Sweden, Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review, 4, 77–82.
  17. Tansel, A. (2004). Public Employment as a Social Protection Mechnaism, Economic Resea