Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The Analysis of the Effect of Human Capital to Development of Turkish Provinces

Türkiye İlleri İtibari ile Beseri Sermayenin Kalkınmaya Etkisinin Analizi

Pages
91–116
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to this finding, the type of education units that are closer to basic education have larger share to determine growth from the perspective of human capital in one of the developing countries, Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to measure human capital and its effects on the development of Turkish provinces.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the scope of chosen 19 provinces, this contribution affetcs growth in varying ratios between %49 and %95.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to this finding, the type of education units that are closer to basic education have larger share to determine growth from the perspective of human capital in one of the developing countries, Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure human capital and its effects on the development of Turkish provinces. The data used in the study for measuring human capital are wage and education variables as indicated in the Household Income and Consumption Survey by Turkish Statistical Institute. Through the application of production based measurement method, the study has found that human capital makes the greatest contribution to the Gross State Product per capita by each province. On the scope of chosen 19 provinces, this contribution affetcs growth in varying ratios between %49 and %95. Another finding of this study is that the education levels besides the undergraduate and graduate education make bigger contribution to GNP per capita. According to this finding, the type of education units that are closer to basic education have larger share to determine growth from the perspective of human capital in one of the developing countries, Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalısma beseri sermayenin Türkiye’deki iller bazında kalkınmaya etkisinin ölçümünü amaçlamaktadır. Çalısmaya ait veriler Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’nun Hane Halkı Gelir ve Tüketim Anketi’nde yer alan ve beseri sermayenin ölçümünde kullanılan ücret ve egitim degiskenleridir. Üretim fonksiyonuna dayalı ölçme metodunun uygulaması sonucunda, beseri sermayenin, iller tarafından üretilen fert bası Gayrisafi Milli Hâsılaya en büyük katkıyı yaptıgı tespit edilmistir. Seçilen 19 il kapsamında, bu katkının, kalkınmayı %49 ile %95 arasında degisen oranlarda etkiledigi ortaya konulmustur. Çalısmada ortaya konan diger bir bulgu da lisans ve lisans üzeri egitim dısında kalan egitim seviyelerinin, fert bası Gayrisafi Milli Hâsılaya daha büyük bir katkı sagladıgıdır. Bu sonuca göre, kalkınmakta olan ülkelerden biri olan Türkiye’de temel egitime yakın egitim birimlerinin kalkınmayı beseri sermaye açısından belirlemede daha büyük bir pay sahibi oldukları ortaya çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞDEMİR, Ö., ACAROĞLU, H. (2022). The Analysis of the Effect of Human Capital to Development of Turkish Provinces. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 91–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/506108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acaroglu, Hakan. (2005). Üretim İçinde Beseri Sermayenin Payı: Türkiye İlleri İtibarı İle Beseri Sermayenin Kalkınmaya Etkisinin Ölçülmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskisehir. Barro, Robert J. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, No. 2 (May, 1991), 407-443.
  2. Becker, G. (1962). Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 5, Part 2: Investment in Human Beings (Oct., 1962), 9-49.
  3. Becker, G. (1975). Human Capital A Theoretical and Emprical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, National Bureau of Economic Research, Colombia University Pres, New York. Becker, G. (1998).
  4. Human Capital and Poverty, Religion & Liberty, Volume 8, Number 1. Becker, G., Murphy, Kevin M., Tamura, Robert F. (1990).
  5. Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth. NBR Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 3414. Benhabib, Jess, Spiegel, Mark (1992). The Role Of Human Capital In Economic Development: Evidence From Aggregate Cross-Country And Regional U.S. Data. Economic Research Reports.RR #92-46, (October 1992).
  6. Bhatta, S. D., Lobo, J. (2000). Human capital and per capita product: A comparison of US states, Regional Science, 393-411.
  7. Blaug, Mark. 1976. The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 14, No. 3; 827-855.
  8. Bowman, J. M. (1968). The Human Investment Revolution in Economic Thought. Economics of Education 1.ed. Mark Blaug, Penguin Books, London, s.103. Denison, E. (1962). The Sources of Economic Growth in the U.S.A. and Alternatives Before Us. Committee for Economic Development, N.Y. Denison, E. (1985) Trends in american economic growth. The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC Glaeser, Edward, l., Scheinkman, Jose A., Shleifer, Andrei. (1995). Economic Growth In A Cross-Section Of Cities. NBR Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 5013. Kendrick, J. W. (1976). The Formation and Stocks of Total Capital. New York: Columbia University for NBER. Krueger, A. O. (1968). Factor Endowments and Per Capita Income Differences among Countries. The Economic Journal, Vol. 78, No.311, Sep. 641-659.
  9. Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., Weil, N., D. (1990). A Contribution To The Empirics of Economic Growth. NBR Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 3541. Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., Weil, N., D.(1992). A Contribution To The Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No.2, (May, 992), 407-