Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Amerika birleşik devletleri’nde eğitim sisteminde yerel-leşme reformunun yayılım ve kurumsallaşma dinamikleri

Dynamics in the Diffusion and Institutionalization of Site-Based Management Reform in the United States of America

Pages
21–47
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, surprisingly more liberal states can be less likely to move quickly to adopt some policies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is examined research question: “How does the diffusion of SBM over time and space resemble the broader social dynamics associated with diffusion of educational policy innovations in particular, and other public policy innovations in general?” Data comes from various secondary data sources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study generates several conclusions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, surprisingly more liberal states can be less likely to move quickly to adopt some policies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is examined research question: “How does the diffusion of SBM over time and space resemble the broader social dynamics associated with diffusion of educational policy innovations in particular, and other public policy innovations in general?” Data comes from various secondary data sources. Study generates several conclusions. First, institutional theory helps explain the diffusion of SBM. The analysis provides support for institutional theory that pressures to adopt a “fashionable” practice builds gradually over time. It’s also revealed that when isomorphic pressures are absent in a region, diffusion may be explained by nationwide institutional dynamics. Study points to possible learning effects in the regional diffusion process when mimetic pressures are absent. Finally, surprisingly more liberal states can be less likely to move quickly to adopt some policies.

Özet

Bu araştırma, “eğitim sisteminde yerelleşme reformunun zaman ve mekan içindeki yayılımı, özelde eğitim politikalarında, genelde kamu politikalarındaki yenilikler ile ilişkili daha geniş sosyal dinamiklerle nasıl etkileşmektedir?” sorusuna cevap aramaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri, çeşitli ikincil kaynaklardan derlenmiştir. Araştırma, birkaç farklı sonuç üretmiştir. Bunlardan ilki, kurumsalcı kuramın, eğitimde yerelleşme reformunun yayılımını açıklamak konusunda geçerli olduğudur. Analiz sonuçları, “moda” haline gelmiş bir uygulamanın benimsenmesi konusunda oluşan baskıların zaman içinde, yavaş yavaş inşa edildiği yönündeki kurumsalcı tezi destekler niteliktedir. Araştırmanın şaşırtıcı bir sonucu, liberal eyaletlerin bazı politikaları benimsemek konusunda daha yavaş hareket edebildikleridir. Özetle bu araştırma, politikaların yayılım sürecini anlamamız açısından belirgin katkılar sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYILAR, Y., GÖK, K. (2022). Amerika birleşik devletleri’nde eğitim sisteminde yerel-leşme reformunun yayılım ve kurumsallaşma dinamikleri. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 21–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/506063

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Allison, Paul (1995).
  2. SAS manual on the survival analysis, SAS Publications, CA. Bacharach, S. B., Masters, W. F., and Mundell, B. (1995). Institutional theory and the politics of institutionalization: Logics of action in school reform. Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, 3, 83-122.
  3. Balla, S. J. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29(3), pp.221-245.
  4. Baron, J. N., Dobbin, F.R., and Jennings, P. D. (1986). War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. American Journal of Sociology. Baum, L. and Canon, Bradley (1981). Patterns of adoption of tort law innovations: An application of diffusion theory to judicial doctrines. American Political Science Review, 75, 975-987.
  5. Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis, American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415.
  6. Berry, F. S. (1994). Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 22(3), 442- 456. Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research, In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy, Boulder, Co: Westview.169-200.
  7. Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1992). Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political Opportunity, American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 715-742.
  8. Berry, F. S. (1994). Innovation in public management: The adoption of strategic planning, Public Administration Review, 54(4), p.322-330
  9. Bidwell, C. E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education Extra Issue, 100-114.
  10. Bloodgood, J. M. & Morrow, J. L. (2000). Strategic organizational change within an institutional framework. Journal of Managerial Issues, 12(2), 208-226.
  11. Bloosfeld, Hans-Peter & Golsch, K., & Rohwer, G. (2007). Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Casual Analysis. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  12. Boehmke, F. J. & Witmer, R. (2004). Disentangling diffusion: The effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion, Political Research Quarterly, 57 (1), 39-51.
  13. Briggs, K. L. & Wohlstetter, p. (2003). Key elements of a successful school-based management strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 351-372.
  14. Burns, L. R. and Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adoption and abandon