Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The relationships between primary energy consumption, carbon dioxide emission and economic growth in Turkey: An analysis of cointegration and causality

Türkiye'de birincil enerji tüketimi, karbondioksit emisyonu ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Eşbütünleşme ve nedensellik analizi

Pages
263–294
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Empirical results indicate that there is an evidence of a long-run relationship between the variables in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study investigates cointegration and causality between primary energy consumption, CO2 emissions, per capita gross domestic product and investments for Turkey using ARDL bounds testing approach complemented by Johansen Juselius cointegration framework for time span 1970-2008.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has also been found that energy consumption, economic growth and investment are the long-run causes for CO2 emissions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Empirical results indicate that there is an evidence of a long-run relationship between the variables in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study investigates cointegration and causality between primary energy consumption, CO2 emissions, per capita gross domestic product and investments for Turkey using ARDL bounds testing approach complemented by Johansen Juselius cointegration framework for time span 1970-2008. Empirical results indicate that there is an evidence of a long-run relationship between the variables in Turkey. The results indicate that uni-directional causality exists from economic growth and primary energy consumption to carbon dioxide emission both in the short-run. It has also been found that energy consumption, economic growth and investment are the long-run causes for CO2 emissions. An important policy implication is that energy consumption can be considered as an important factor for the economic growth and investment in Turkey. Moreover, as higher energy consumption also means higher pollution in the long-run, policy makers should stimulate alternative energy sources for meeting up the increasing energy demand.

Özet

Bu çalışma 1970-2008 dönemi için Türkiyede karbondioksit emisyonu, fert başına gelir, birincil enerji tüketimi ve yatırımlar arasındaki ilişkiyi eşbütünleşme ve nedensellik testleriyle araştırmaktadır. Ampirik sonuçlarda, değişkenler arasında bir eşbütünleşme ilişkisinin mevcut olduğu gözlenmiştir. Test sonuçlarında ekonomik büyüme ve birincil enerji tüketiminden karbondioksit emisyonuna doğru kısa dönem tek yönlü nedensel ilişkiye rastlanmıştır. Ayrıca enerji tüketimi, ekonomik büyüme ve yatırımların uzun dönemde karbondioksit emisyonunun Granger nedeni olduğu ortaya konmuştur. Bu sonuçlardan Türkiyede enerji tüketimi ve yatırımların ekonomik büyümede en önemli faktör olduğu söylenebilir. Dolayısıyla artan enerji tüketiminin uzun dönemde daha fazla kirlenmeye yol açacağından politika yapıcılarının artan enerji talebini karşılamak için alternatif enerji kaynaklarını teşvik etmeleri gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINTAŞ, H. (2022). The relationships between primary energy consumption, carbon dioxide emission and economic growth in Turkey: An analysis of cointegration and causality. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 263–294. https://ajindex.com/articles/505624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Akbostancı, E, Türüt-Asik S ve Tunç, G. İ. (2009), “The Relationship Between Income and Environment in Turkey: is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve?”, Energy Policy, 37:861-867.
  2. Alam, M. J., Begum, I. A., Buysse, J., Rahman, S. ve Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2011), ”Guido Van Huylenbroeckd Dynamic Modeling of Causal Relationship Between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions And Economic Growth in India”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 243– 3251. Altınay, G. ve Karagol, E., (2004) “Structural Break, Unit Root, and The Causality Between Energy Consumption and GDP in Turkey”, Energy Economics, 26, 985– 994. Ang, James B., (2007), “CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, And Output in France”, Energy Policy 35 (10), 4772–4778. Ang, James B. (2008), “Economic “Development, Pollutant Emissions and Energy Consumption In Malaysia”, Journal of Policy Modeling, 30, 271–278. Apergis, N. ve Payne E. J. (2010), “The Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Growth Nexus: Evidence from The Commonwealth of Independent States”, Energy Policy, 38, 650–655. Apergis, N. ve Payne, J.E., (2009), ”CO2 Emissions, Energy Usage, and Output in Central America”, Energy Policy, 37, 3282–3286. Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., Menyah, K. ve Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2010), “On The Casual Dynamics Beetween Emissions, Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and Economic Growth”, Ecological Economics, 69, 2255-2260.
  3. Beckerman, W., (1992), “Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth? Whose Environment?”, World Development 20, 481–496. Beltratti, A., (1997), Models of Economic Growth with Environmental Assets, Kluwer Academic, London. BP (British Petroleum) (2012), Historical Statistical Data from 1965-2011, http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle800.do?categoryId=9037130&contentId =7068669, (Erişim Tarihi 21.09.2012).
  4. Brown, S.P A. ve Yücel, M. K.,(2002), “Energy Prices and Aggregate Economic Activity: an Interpretative Survey”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42, 193–208. Bulte, E.H. ve van Soest, D.P., (2001), “Environmental Degradation in Developing Countries: Households and The (Reverse) Environmental Kuznets Curve”, Journal of Development Economics 65, 225–235. Chang, Ching-Chih (2010) “A Multivariate Causality Test of Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in China”, Applied Energy, 87, 3533–3537. Coondoo D. ve Dinda S. (2008), “The Carbon dioxide emission and income: A Temporal Analysis of Cross-Country Distributional Patterns”, Ecological Economics, 65:375-3