Journals / Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Teachers’ Perception of 2018 Turkish National Curriculum Change

Öğretmenlerin Türkiye’deki 2018 Ulusal Eğitim Programı Değişikliğine İlişkin Algıları

Pages
458–475
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research findings indicated teacThis research aimed to reveal teachers’ perception of 2018 Turkish national curriculum change.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research aimed to reveal teachers’ perception of 2018 Turkish national curriculum change.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was designed as a mixed method research. 306 teachers participated in the quantitative phase of the study and eight teachers participated in the qualitative part of the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research findings indicated teacThis research aimed to reveal teachers’ perception of 2018 Turkish national curriculum change.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:eğitim programı · eğitim programı geliştirme · eğitim programı değişikliği

Abstract

This research aimed to reveal teachers’ perception of 2018 Turkish national curriculum change. The research was designed as a mixed method research. 306 teachers participated in the quantitative phase of the study and eight teachers participated in the qualitative part of the study. The data were collected through a scale and semi-structured interviews in the spring semester of 2019-2020 education year. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and content analysis was conducted for the analysis of the qualitative data. The research findings indicated teacThis research aimed to reveal teachers’ perception of 2018 Turkish national curriculum change. The research was designed as a mixed method research. 306 teachers participated in the quantitative phase of the study and eight teachers participated in the qualitative part of the study. The data were collected through a scale and semi-structured interviews in the spring semester of 2019-2020 education year. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and content analysis was conducted for the analysis of the qualitative data. The research findings indicated teachers’ perception regarding curriculum change was at “neutral” level. In addition, it was found that teachers’ perception differed significantly in terms of having postgraduate degree and getting in-service training while teachers’ age, experience, level of school and faculty graduated did not create a significant difference. Also, it was found teachers viewed all curricula similar after 2005 constructivist curriculum reform and lacked sufficient knowledge and skills as regards to implementation of different dimensions of the 2018 curricula. Thus, providing teachers with quality in-service training may be recommended in order to introduce the fundamentals of new curricula so that teachers may adopt and apply them easier. hers’ perception regarding curriculum change was at “not sure” level. In addition, it was found that teachers’ perception differed significantly in terms of having graduate degree and getting in-service training while teachers’ age, experience, level of school and faculty graduated did not create a significant difference. Also, it was found teachers viewed all curricula similar after 2005 constructivist curriculum reform and lacked sufficient knowledge and skills about different dimensions of the 2018 curricula. Thus, providing teachers with quality in-service training may be recommended in order to introduce the fundamentals of new curricula so that teachers may adopt and apply them easier.

Özet

Bu araştırma, öğretmenlerin Türkiye’deki 2018 ulusal eğitim programı değişikliğine ilişkin algılarını ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamıştır. Araştırma, karma yöntem araştırması olarak tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel kısmına 306 öğretmen, nitel kısmına ise sekiz öğretmen katılmıştır. Veriler, 2019-2020 eğitim-öğretim yılı bahar döneminde bir ölçek ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme yoluyla toplanmıştır. Nicel verilerin analizinde hem betimleyici hem de yordamsal istatistikler, nitel verilerin analizinde ise içerik analizi uygulanmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, öğretmenlerin eğitim programı değişikliğine ilişkin algılarının “kararsızım” düzeyinde olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin eğitim programı değişikliğine ilişkin algılarının lisansüstü eğitim ve hizmet içi eğitim alma yönünden anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığı, ancak yaş, deneyim, çalışılan okul düzeyi ve mezun olunan fakülte türünün anlamlı bir fark yaratmadığı bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin 2005 yapılandırmacı eğitim programı reformundan sonra tüm eğitim programlarını benzer gördükleri ve programların farklı boyutlarının uygulanmasına ilişkin yeterli bilgi ve beceriye sahip olmadıkları belirlenmiştir. Bu nedenle, öğretmenlere yeni programları daha kolay benimsemeleri ve uygulamaları için programların uygulama esaslarını tanıtan kaliteli hizmet içi eğitim verilmesi önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÜDOĞRU, F. (2022). Teachers’ Perception of 2018 Turkish National Curriculum Change. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 458–475. https://ajindex.com/articles/504895

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acar, A. (2019). A comparison of the 2013 and 2018 primary and secondary schools elt curricula in Turkey: An analysis of 7th-grade syllabı). Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 48(224), 299-325.
  2. Akpınar, B., & Aydın, K. (2007). Change in education and teachers’ perception of change. Education and Science, 32(144), 71-80.
  3. Banning, E. I. (1954). Teacher attitudes toward curriculum change: The effect of personal relationships on the degree of favorableness. Journal of Experimental Education, 23(2), 133-146.
  4. Bıçak, N., & Alver, M. (2018). Teachers’ views on the 2018 Turkish lesson curriculum. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 7(4), 2480-2501.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches. USA: Sage Publications. Dikbayır, A. (2018). Investigation of the alignment between designed, taught and tested high school mathematics curriculum. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Ege University, İzmir.
  6. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th Ed.). London: Sage Publications. Flores, M. A. (2005). Teachers' views on recent curriculum changes: Tensions and challenges. Curriculum Journal, 16(3), 401-413. DOI: 10.1080/09585170500256479 Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2014). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. England: Pearson Education Limited. Gültekin, M. (2014). Trends in primary education programs in the world and Turkey. Elementary Education Online, 13(3), 726-745.
  7. Harris, R., & Graham, S. (2019). Engaging with curriculum reform: Insights from English history teachers’ willingness to support curriculum change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(1), 43-61.
  8. Johnson, J. A. (2001). Principles of effective change: Curriculum revision that works. The Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 1(1), 5-18.
  9. Kahramanoğlu, R. (2019). A study on teachers' levels of curriculum literacy. The Journal of International Social Research, 12(45), 827-840.
  10. Karabacak, E. (2018). Analyzing the alignment between the primary school official English curriculum and the taught curriculum). Unpublished master’s thesis, Anadolu University, Eskişehir. Kennedy, K. J. (2010). School-based curriculum development for new times: A comparative analysis. In E. H. F. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies. Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 3–20). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  11. Keskin, İ. (2019). Evaluation of high school mathematic