Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: Özel Sayı

Illuminative Program Evaluation Model

Aydınlatıcı Program Değerlendirme Modeli*

Pages
25–34
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, in this study some recommendations were provided for future program evaluation studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to introduce Illuminative Program Evaluation Model, which is one of the program evaluation models in education, has almost never been used in program evaluation studies so far, and about which Turkish resources are quite inadequate, thus contribute to the Turkish literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this scope, first underlying paradigm and features of the Illuminative Evaluation Model as well as its aims were explained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, in this study some recommendations were provided for future program evaluation studies.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to introduce Illuminative Program Evaluation Model, which is one of the program evaluation models in education, has almost never been used in program evaluation studies so far, and about which Turkish resources are quite inadequate, thus contribute to the Turkish literature. Within this scope, first underlying paradigm and features of the Illuminative Evaluation Model as well as its aims were explained. Then, conceptual and methodological framework as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the Illuminative Evaluation Model were revealed so as to enlighten how the model can be used. As a result, Illuminative Evaluation Model can be used effectively in evaluation studies especially in the evaluation of innovative programs, in studies requiring in-depth study of context and in studies where a variety of data collection tools are used. In addition, in this study some recommendations were provided for future program evaluation studies.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, eğitimde program değerlendirme modellerinden biri olan ancak Türkiye'de günümüze kadar yapılmış program değerlendirme çalışmalarında neredeyse hiç kullanılmamış ve Türkçe kaynakları oldukça yetersiz olan Aydınlatıcı Program Değerlendirme Modelinin tanıtılması ve bu yolla Türkçe alanyazına katkı sağlanması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç kapsamında çalışmada önce Aydınlatıcı Değerlendirme Modelinin dayandığı paradigma ve özellikleri açıklanarak modelin ne olduğu ve neyi hedeflediği ortaya konmuştur. Daha sonra aydınlatıcı değerlendirme modelinin kavramsal ve yöntemsel çerçevesi ile güçlü yönleri ve sınırlılıkları ortaya konularak modelin nasıl kullanılabileceği konusuna açıklık getirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, Aydınlatıcı Değerlendirme Modelinin özellikle yenilikçi programların değerlendirilmesinde ve bağlamın derinlemesine incelendiği ve çeşitli veri toplama araçlarının kullanıldığı değerlendirme çalışmalarında etkili olarak kullanılabildiği tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, çalışma kapsamında gelecekte gerçekleştirilecek program değerlendirme çalışmalarına yönelik öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÜDOĞRU, F., ADIGÜZEL, O. C. (2022). Illuminative Program Evaluation Model. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: Özel Sayı, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/438731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Brooker, M. R. (2009). Youth Mentoring and Adult-Youth Relationships: The Importance of Context. (Unpublished Master's Thesis) Murdoch University, Murdoch. Buist, M. (1984). Illuminative Evaluation. J. Lishman (Ed.), Evaluation Research Highlights içinde (s.85- 96). London: Department of Social Work University of Aberdeen. Chang, I. Y. (2010). An Evaluation Of Curricular Implementation in Central City English Village: A Case of An Elementary School in Southern Taiwan. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Alliant International University, San Diego. Demirel, Ö. (2006). Eğitimde Program Geliştirme. Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Ankara:
  2. PegemA Yayıncılık. Ellis, L. (2007). Academics' Perceptions of the Professional and Clinical Doctorate: Findings of A Nationale Survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16, 2272- 2279. Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R. & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (3rd Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Glaser, R. (1977). Evaluation of Instruction and Changing Educational Models. D. Hamilton, D. Jenkins, C. King, B. MacDonald & M. Parlett (Eds.), Beyond the Numbers Game içinde (s. 37-51). London: Macmillan Education. Gredler, M. E. (1996). Program Evaluation. ABD: Pearson Education Company. Harrington, A. D. (2008). Evaluating Community Participation in Health Care Decision-Making: The Case of the Airdrie/North Rocky View Health Needs Project. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Kanada: Wilfrid Laurier University Oliva, P. F. (1988). Developing the Curriculum (2nd Ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown College Division. Ornstein. A. & Hunkins, F. (2009).
  3. Curriculum. Foundation, Principles, and Issues (5th Ed.). United States: Pearson International Edition.
  4. Özüdoğru, F. & Adıgüzel, O. C. (2015). İlkokul 2. Sınıf İngilizce Öğretim Programının Değerlendirilmesi. TURKISH STUDIES- International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, (Prof. Dr. Şefik Yaşar Armağanı), Volume 10/11 Summer 2015, p.1251-1276. ANKARA/ TURKEY, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8692.
  5. Parlett, M. & Dearden, G. (1977). Introduction to Illuminative Evaluation: Studies in Higher Education. California: Pacific Soundings Press.
  6. Parlett, M. & Hamilton, D. (1977). Evaluation as Illumination: A New Approach to the Study of Innovatory Programs. Parlett, M. & Dearden, G. (Eds.), Introduction to Illuminative Evaluation: Studies in Higher Education içinde (