Journals / Erciyes Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Outcome of renal transplantation at Erciyes University Medical Faculty: Analysis of 5 year results

Böbrek transplantasyonu uygulanan olgular: 5 yıllık sonuçların analizi

Pages
86–91
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No significant difference was found between the graft survival rales of living and cadaveric donor kidneys (83% and 80%, respectively; p>0.005) for the first year.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the outcome of renal transplantation patients between the dales 5.5.1994 and 13.8.2000 at Erciyes University Medical Faculty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier test and survival rales in groups by Log-rank test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No significant difference was found between the graft survival rales of living and cadaveric donor kidneys (83% and 80%, respectively; p>0.005) for the first year.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the outcome of renal transplantation patients between the dales 5.5.1994 and 13.8.2000 at Erciyes University Medical Faculty. Material and Method: Survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier test and survival rales in groups by Log-rank test. Results: A total of 30 patients without any contra-indications for transplantation underwent regular hemodialysis or continuous, ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and had renal transplantation. Nineteen of transplanted kidneys were received from living donors whereas cadaveric kidneys were used in 11 patients. Acute rejection was diagnosed and treated in 3 patients. Chronic rejection was diagnosed in 3 patients. Complications due to surgical procedure developed in 5 patients. Urinary infections were the most common form of infectious complications. A total of 4 patients died of various causes. Conclusion: Patients ' survival rates were 96% and 67% for the first year and for 5 years of the follow up period, respectively. On the other hand, graft survival rales were 82% and 48% for the first year and for 5 years of the follow up period, respectively. No significant difference was found between the graft survival rales of living and cadaveric donor kidneys (83% and 80%, respectively; p>0.005) for the first year.

Özet

Amaç:Bu çalışmada Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakiiltesi'nde 5.5.1994 tarihinden 13.8.2000 tarihine kadar renal transplantasyon uygulanan olguların mortalite ve morbidite ile ilgili verilerinin sunulması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Sağkalım oranlarının hesaplanmasında Kaplan-Meier ve gruplardaki sağkalım oranlarının hesaplanmasında Log-rank testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Düzenli hemodiyaliz veya SAPD uygulanan hastalardan transplantasyona engel oluşturacak kontrendi kasyonları olmayan 30 hastaya (Ortalama yaş 29.8 ±7.1 yıl) renal transplantasyon uygulandı. Donör kaynağı 19 (%63.3) olguda canlı, 11 olguda (%36.7) ise kadavra idi. Üç hastada akut rejeksiyon epizodu tanısı konarak tedavi verildi. Üç hastada kronik rejeksiyon, beş hastada cerrahi işleme bağlı komplikasyonlar gözlendi. Üriner infeksiyonlar en sık gözlenen infeksiyöz komplikasyondu. İzlem süresi boyunca dört hasta çeşitli sebeplere bağlı olarak kaybedildi. Greft kaybı gelişmiş altı hasta kronik hemodiyaliz programına geri döndü. Halen fonksiyone grefl ile takip edilen hasta sayısı 20 'dir. Sonuç: Bir yıllık hasta sağkahını % 96, beş yıllık hasta sağkalımı ise % 67 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bir yıllık renal sağkalım %82, beş yıllık renal sağkalım ise % 48 olarak bulunmuştur. Canlı vericiden yapılan nakillerde 1 yıllık renal sağkalım oranı % 83, kadavra böbreği nakillerinde ise % 80 idi ve gruplar arasında anlamlı fark bulunamamıştır (p>0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

DÜŞÜNSEL, R., PATIROĞLU, T., TOKGÖZ, B., OYMAK, O., UTAŞ, C., DOĞUKAN, A., TAŞKAPAN, H., YILMAZ, Z., SÖZÜER, E. (2022). Outcome of renal transplantation at Erciyes University Medical Faculty: Analysis of 5 year results. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 86–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/502868

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry. Clin Transpl. 1999; 1-21
  2. Morris PJ. Factors influencing outcome in cadaveric renal transplantation. Br J Surg 1994; 81(5): 635-636
  3. Knight RJ, Kerman RH, Welsh M, et al. Chronic rejection in primary renal allograft recipients under cyclosporine-prednisolone immunsupressive therapy. Transplantation 1991; 51:355-359
  4. McDonald AS, Belitsky P, Bitter-Suermann H, Cohen Ad, Croker J, MacSween M. Long-term follow-up cyclosporine treated renal allograft recipients. Transplant Proc 1988; 20:1239-1243
  5. Rao KV, Rose J. Incidence, histological patterns, and clinical outcome of rejection episodes occuring in the late post-transplant period. Transplantation 1985; 40: 631-637
  6. Curtis JJ. Hypertension following kidney transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 23: 471-475
  7. Fervenza FC, Lafayette RA, Alfrey EJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis in kidney transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 31: 142-148
  8. Guıllou PJ, Will EJ, Davison AM, Giles GR. CAPD- A risk factor for renal transplantation? Br J Surg 1984; 71: 878-880
  9. Transplantation in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Winchester JF, Rotellar C, Goggins M, et al. Kidney Int 1993; 40: 101- 105
  10. O’Donoghue DJ, Dyer PA, Gokal R. Renal transplantation in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. In: La Gracea G, Chiaramonte S, Fabris A (eds), Peritoneal dialysis. Wichtig Editore, Milan 1988, pp259-264
  11. Jindal RM. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus- A review Transplantation 58: 1994; 1289-1298
  12. Rao M, Jacob CK, Shastry JCM. Post- transplant diabetes mellitus- A retrospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1992; 7: 1039- 1042
  13. Dummer JS, Hardy A, Poorstar A, Ho M. Early infections in kidney, heart, and liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine. Transplantation 1983; 36: 259-267
  14. Stuby U, Kaiser P, Grafinger P, Biesenbach G, Zazgornik J. Urinary tract infection after renal transplantation under conventional therapy and cyclosporine. Transplant Proc 1989; 21: 2110-2111.