Journals / Endüstri Mühendisliği / 2012 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Health care sytem efficiency analysis of oecd countries

Oecd ülkelerinin sağlık sistemlerinin etkinlik analizi

Pages
14–31
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, points of interest on reviews and prospective improvements are stated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Efficient use of resources plays a key role in health sector management and health care costs in Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) member countries account approximately for 9.8% of their GDP.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, after determining the input and output variables from an extensive literature study and using the most recent health care data available, health care efficiency of 34 OECD members are evaluated via Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, points of interest on reviews and prospective improvements are stated.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Efficient use of resources plays a key role in health sector management and health care costs in Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) member countries account approximately for 9.8% of their GDP. In this paper, after determining the input and output variables from an extensive literature study and using the most recent health care data available, health care efficiency of 34 OECD members are evaluated via Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In order to avoid any missing interpretation during the evaluation process, number of countries is initially reduced to 22 based on an elimination process by using Pierce's Criterion, and these countries are re-evaluated. 10 countries out of 34 are listed as efficient, while only seven states in 22 were found efficient in the re-evaluation process. Lastly, points of interest on reviews and prospective improvements are stated.

Özet

OECD üye ülkelerinin Gayri Safi Yurt İçi Hasılalarının (GSYİH) ortalama olarak %9,8’ini harcadıkları sağlık hizmetleri ve sistemlerinin yönetiminde, kaynakların etkin kullanımı kilit rol oynamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, kapsamlı bir literatür araştırmasıyla girdi ve çıktı değişkenleri belirlendikten sonra, en güncel sağlık verileri kullanılarak Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ile OECD üyesi 34 ülkenin sağlık alanındaki etkinlikleri değerlendirilmiştir. Değerlendirilmelerde yaşanabilecek eksik yorumlamaların önüne geçebilmek için Pierce Kriteri kullanılarak yapılan eleme süreciyle ülke sayısı 22’ye indirilmiş ve bu ülkeler tekrar değerlendirilmiştir. 34 ülke arasından 10 ülke etkin olarak kaydedilirken, yeni değerlendirmede 22 ülke içinden sadece yedi ülke etkin olarak belirlenmiştir. Son olarak, değerlendirilmelerde dikkat edilmesi gereken noktalar ve ileriye dönük olarak yapılabilecek iyileştirmeler tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAKTAR, D., KOCAMAN, A. M., MUTLU, M. E., ARAZ, M. Ö. (2022). Health care sytem efficiency analysis of oecd countries. Endüstri Mühendisliği, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 14–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/501186

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Afonso, A., Aubyn, M. 2005. “Non-Parametric Approaches to Education and Health Efficiency in OECD Count- ries,” Journal of Applied Economics, 8 (3), 227-246
  2. Afonso, A., Aubyn, M., 2006. “Relative Efficiency of Health Provision: A DEA Approach With Non-Discretionary Inputs”, Working Papers, Department of Economics At The School Of Economics And Management (ISEG), Technical University of Lisbon
  3. Al-Shammari, M., 1999. “A Multi-Criteria Data Envelop- ment Analysis Model for Measuring The Productive Efficiency of Hospitals,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19 (9), 879-890
  4. Banker, R.D., Thrall, R.M. 1992. “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 62 (2), 74-84
  5. Bhagavath, V. 2002. “Technical Efficiency Measurement By Data Envelopment Analysis: an Application in Trans- portation,” Alliance Journal of Business Research, 2 (1), 60-72
  6. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., Thanassoulis, E. 1991. “Applied Data Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal Of Operational Research, 52 (1), 1-15
  7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhones, E. 1978. “Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” Europan Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444
  8. Chu Ng, Y. 2008. “The Productive Efficiency of The Health Care Sector of China,” The Review of Regional Studies, 38 (3), 381-393
  9. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L., Tone, K. 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA Solver Software, Springer, New York
  10. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L., Zhu, J. 2004. Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Springer, New York
  11. Gonçalves, A., Noronha, C., Lins, M., Almeida, R. 2007. “Data Envelopment Analysis For Evaluating Public Hospitals İn Brazilian State Capitals,” Rev Saúde Pública,41 (3), 1-8
  12. Mirmirani, S., Lippmann, M. 2003. “Health Care System Efficiency Analysis of G12 Countries,” International Business & Economics Research Journal, 3 (5), 35-42
  13. OECD, 2001. OECD Strategies for Sustainable Development, France
  14. Ray, S.C. 2004. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory and Techniques for Economics and Operations Research, Cambridge University Press, UK
  15. Ross, S.M. 2003. “Peirce’s Criterion for The Elimination of Suspect Experimental Data,” Journal of Engineering Technolog, 20 (2), 1-12
  16. Spinks, J., Hollingsworth, B. 2005. “Health Production And The Socioeconomic Determinants of Health in OECD Countries: The Use of Effic