Journals / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 87

ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH

Matematik Öğretimi Yeterlik İnancı Envanteri (MÖYİE)’nin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması

Pages
413–434
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it can be said that the MTEBI, which was adapted to the Turkish language is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Self-efficacy in teaching mathematics can be explained as teachers’ personal beliefs about their self-efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics and personal perceptions of their self-ability to teach mathematics to others.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Also, teachers’ attitudes, believes, and behaviors have a significant effect on students’ preparation and their academic success.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it can be said that the MTEBI, which was adapted to the Turkish language is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Self-efficacy in teaching mathematics can be explained as teachers’ personal beliefs about their self-efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics and personal perceptions of their self-ability to teach mathematics to others. Also, teachers’ attitudes, believes, and behaviors have a significant effect on students’ preparation and their academic success. So, it is important to examine teachers’ efficacy beliefs towards teaching mathematics. Not more quantitative research was found on the evaluation tools for determining teaching mathematics efficiency belief of teachers in Turkey. The purpose of the current study is to adapt the Teaching Mathematics Efficacy Belief Inventory (TMEBI) to the Turkish language. The sample of the study consists of 426 prospective mathematics teachers (54.5% female and 45.5% male). The scale that was used in the study was developed by Enochs, Smith, and Huinker (2000) to determine teaching efficacy belief towards mathematics. Firstly, for linguistic equivalence study, the correlation coefficient was examined, and then validity and reliability analysis were conducted. Validity and reliability studies were applied to adapting the Turkish form. Findings showed the highreliability coefficients of the scale were found (Cronbach’s α (.91), McDonald’s ω (.85), and Two-Half Test (r =.83)). Finally, it can be said that the MTEBI, which was adapted to the Turkish language is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Özet

Matematik öğretiminde öz-yeterlik, öğretmenlerin matematik öğretiminde öz-yeterlik inançlarına ilişkin kişisel inançları ve başkalarına matematik öğretme öz yeterliklerine ilişkin kişisel algıları olarak açıklanabilir. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin tutumları, inançları ve davranışları öğrencilerin hazırlanmaları ve akademik başarıları üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Bu nedenle, öğretmenin matematik öğretimine yönelik yeterlik inançlarını incelemek önemlidir ve Türkiye’de öğretmenlerin matematik öğretimi inançlarını belirlemeye yönelik değerlendirme araçlarına ilişkin nicel araştırmalara rastlanmamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Matematik Öğretimi Yeterlilik İnanç Envanteri’ni (MÖYİE) Türkçe diline uyarlamaktır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 426 matematik öğretmeni adayı (%54,5 kadın ve %45,5 erkek) oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan ölçek Enochs, Smith ve Huinker (2000) tarafından matematik öğretimi yeterlik inancını belirlemek için geliştirilmiştir. Dilsel eşdeğerlik çalışması için öncelikle korelasyon katsayısı incelenmiş, ardından geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizi yapılmıştır. Türkçe formun uyarlanmasında geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Bulgular, ölçeğin yüksek güvenirlik katsayılarının bulunduğunu (Cronbach’s α (.91), McDonald’s ω (.85) ve İki Yarı Testi (r = .83) göstermiştir. Son olarak Türkçeye uyarlanan MÖYİE’nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAKUNYACI, M. (2022). ADAPTATION OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS EFFICACY BELIEF INVENTORY (TMEBI) INTO TURKISH. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 87, 413–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/498363

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acar Güvendir, M. and Özer Özkan, Y. (2015) Türkiye’deki eğitim alanında yayımlanan bilimsel dergilerde ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama konulu makalelerin incelenmesi [The examination of scale development and scale adaptation articles published in Turkish academic journals on education]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(52), 23-33.
  2. Aerni, P.W. (2008). Teacher self-efficacy and beliefs for teaching mathematics in inclusion settings. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The College of William and Mary in Virginia. UMI Number: 3353198. Aksu, H. H. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik öğretimine yönelik öz-yeterlilik inançları [Prospective teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics teaching]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 1610- 170. Aksu, Z. and Kul, U. (2019). The mediating role of mathematics teaching efficacy on the relationships between pedagogical content knowledge and mathematics teaching anxiety. SAGE Open 9(3), 1-10.
  3. Akyıldız, P. and Çınar, C. (2016). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının lineer cebir dersine yönelik tutumları ve alan dili yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of pre-service primary mathematics teachers’ attitudes towards linear algebra course and competences of the field language]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 1-22.
  4. Allinder, R.M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86-95.
  5. Allinder, R.M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 16(4), 247-254.
  6. Allison, P.D. (2002). Missing Data. California: Sage Publication, Inc. Ashton, P., Buhr, D. and Crocker, L. (1984). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: A self- or normreferenced construct? Florida Journal of Educational Research, 26(1), 29-41.
  7. Ashton, P.T., and Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. Longman Press.
  8. Askar, P., and Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz yeterlik algısı [Perceived Computer Self-Efficacy of the Students in The Elementary Mathematics Teaching Programme]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 1-8.
  9. Aydın, S., and Çelik, D. (2016). Preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about preparedness to teach mathematics: scale adaptation and validatio