SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Group Moderation Assessment Model: An Example of an Open-Ended Mathematics Exam*

Emin AYDIN
Mithat TAKUNYACI
Pages
357–378
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it was found that the raters scored in a consistent way with each other in the exams conducted after the group moderation assessment model workshops.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the assessment of an open-ended mathematics exam to reveal the effects of the Group Moderation Assessment Model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The exam papers used in this study belong to a total of 22 students studying in the 10th grade.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it was found that the raters scored in a consistent way with each other in the exams conducted after the group moderation assessment model workshops.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the assessment of an open-ended mathematics exam to reveal the effects of the Group Moderation Assessment Model. The Group Moderation Assessment Model is a process in which teachers share their expectations and understanding standards with each other to improve the consistency of their students’ learning decisions. In this study, one of the non- random sampling methods, the appropriate sampling method was used. The exam papers used in this study belong to a total of 22 students studying in the 10th grade. The students’ exam papers (for three math exams) were evaluated by an assessment team of five mathematics teachers in the group moderation assessment model. The findings show that the raters were positively influenced by each other and that they formed a reliable evaluation system by making judgments. In addition, it was found that the raters scored in a consistent way with each other in the exams conducted after the group moderation assessment model workshops. In conclusion, in the workshops held during the implementation of the group moderation assessment model, it was found that the teachers’ knowledge and opinion with each other positively affected the teachers’ ability to assess exam papers.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, E., TAKUNYACI, M. (2022). Group Moderation Assessment Model: An Example of an Open-Ended Mathematics Exam*. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 357–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/590500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adie, L. E. (2013). The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 91–106.
  2. Aiken, L. R. (2000). Psychological testing and assessment (10. Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Allal, L., & Mottier Lopez, L. (2014). Teachers’ professional judgment in the context of collaborative assessment practice. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing Assessment for Quality Learning (pp. 151-165). London: Springer (The Enabling Power of Assessment). Association for Advanced Training, (1988). Association for Advanced Training in The Behavioral Sciences. Pub: Los Angeles. Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme: Klasik Test Teorisi ve Uygulaması [Measurement in Education and Psychology: Classical Test Theory and Practice]. Ankara,
  3. ÖSYM Yayınları.
  4. Benton, T., & Gallacher, T. (2018). Is comparative judgement just a quick form of multiple marking? Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication, 24, 37–40.
  5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90.
  6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2010). Validity in teachers’ summative assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 17(2), 217–34.
  7. Bramley, T., & Vitello, S. (2018). The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 43–58.
  8. Büyükkıdık, S., & Anıl, D. (2015). Performansa dayalı durum belirlemede güvenirliğin genellenebilirlik kuramında farklı desenlerde incelenmesi [Examination of reliability in performance-based assessment in different designs in generalizability theory]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(177), 285-296.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum [Data Analysis Handbook for Social Sciences Statistics, Research Design SPSS Applications and Interpretation] (20th ed.). Ankara:
  10. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Cooksey, R. W., Freebody, P., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2007). Assessment as judgment-in-context: Analysing how teachers evaluate students' writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(5), 101–434.
  11. Clarke, S. (2011). Formative Assessment in Action Weaving The Elements Together. Londres: Hodder Murray. Cunningham, G. K. (1998). Assessment in the classroom: constructing and i