SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2003 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 129

Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri ve Yabancı Dil Başarısı

Language Learning Strategies and Foreign Language Achievement

Mustafa Zülküf ALTAN
Pages
25–31
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Language learning Strategies were measured by the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL, 7.0 ESL/EFL Version), and the foreign language achievement was determined using the mid-semester course grade averages for 21 ELT students attending the English Preparatory class of the ELT Department The findings of the study are: (1) the relationship between language learning Strategies and foreign language achievement was linear, (2) among the categories included in the inventory only compensation for missing knowledge and the total language learning strategies were significantly correlated with the foreign language achievement as measured by the mid-semester course grade averages and (3) among the categories only compensating for the missing knowledge was predictive of the foreign language achievement accounting for 21 percent of the total variation in the achievement scores.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates the relatianship between language learning Strategies and foreign language achievement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper investigates the relatianship between language learning Strategies and foreign language achievement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Language learning Strategies were measured by the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL, 7.0 ESL/EFL Version), and the foreign language achievement was determined using the mid-semester course grade averages for 21 ELT students attending the English Preparatory class of the ELT Department The findings of the study are: (1) the relationship between language learning Strategies and foreign language achievement was linear, (2) among the categories included in the inventory only compensation for missing knowledge and the total language learning strategies were significantly correlated with the foreign language achievement as measured by the mid-semester course grade averages and (3) among the categories only compensating for the missing knowledge was predictive of the foreign language achievement accounting for 21 percent of the total variation in the achievement scores.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper investigates the relatianship between language learning Strategies and foreign language achievement. Language learning Strategies were measured by the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL, 7.0 ESL/EFL Version), and the foreign language achievement was determined using the mid-semester course grade averages for 21 ELT students attending the English Preparatory class of the ELT Department The findings of the study are: (1) the relationship between language learning Strategies and foreign language achievement was linear, (2) among the categories included in the inventory only compensation for missing knowledge and the total language learning strategies were significantly correlated with the foreign language achievement as measured by the mid-semester course grade averages and (3) among the categories only compensating for the missing knowledge was predictive of the foreign language achievement accounting for 21 percent of the total variation in the achievement scores.

Özet

Bu makale dil öğrenme stratejileri ve yabancı dil başarısı arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır.Dil öğrenme stratejileri, Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri Envanteri (SILL, 7.0 ESL/EFL versiyonu) kullanılarak tespit edilirken, yabancı dil başarısı, ingilizce Öğretmenliği Bölümü hazırlık sununa devam eden 21 öğrencinin dönem arası sınavlarının ortalaması alınarak tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları: (1) Dil öğrenme: stratejileri ile yabancı dil öğrenme başarısı arasındaki ilişki doğrusaldır; (2) envanterdeki kategoriler içinde, sadece "bulunmayan bilgiyi kompanse etme" ve dil öğrenme stratejileri toplamı belirgin olarak yabancı dil başarısı ile anlamlı bir ilişki içerisindedir; (3) kategoriler içinde, sadece "bulunmayan bilgiyi kompanse etme", başarı notlarındaki toplam varyasyonun %21'ini oluşturarak yabancı dil başarısını tahmin etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAN, M. Z. (2022). Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri ve Yabancı Dil Başarısı. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 129, 25–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/498065

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 65, 24-35.
  2. Chamot, A.U. (1993). Sutndent responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom, Foreign Language Annals, 26, 308- 321. Chamot, A.U. & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language insttuction. Foreign Language Annals, 22,13-24.
  3. Chamot, A.U. & Kupper, L. (1993). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13-24.
  4. Ehrman, M.E. & Oxford, R.L. (1989). Effects of Sex differences, a career cboice, and psychological type on adult language learning gies. Modern Language Journal, 73, 1-13 Harris D. & Palmer, L. (1970). CELT/A Comprehensive English Test for Speakers of English as a Second Language. New: McGraw-Hill. McGroarty, M. (1987). Patterns of persistent second language learners: Elementary Spanish. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), Miami, FL. McGroarty, M. & Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: An introduction and two related studies. In M. P. Amado, H.H.F.&C.M. Valdez (Eds.) Foreign Language Education: Issues and Strategies. Newburry Park, CA: Sage Publications. Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H.H. &Todesco, A. (1978).
  5. The 'language learner, Toronto: Modern Language Center, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Nyikos, M. & Oxford, R.L. (1993). A factor analytic study of language learning strategy use Interpretations from information processing theory and social psychology. Modern Language Journal, 77, 11-22.
  6. O'Malley, J.M. (1984). The effects of training in the use of learning strategies on learning English as a second language. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), Houston TX. O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P. Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House. Oxford, R.L. & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73 (2), 291-300.
  7. Oxford, R.L. & Burry, J. (1993). Evaluation, norming, factor analysis, and psychometric testing of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) throughout the world. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education. Oxford, R.