SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2004 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 131

Eğitim Kurumlarında Alternatif Çatışma Yöntemi: Kavramsal Bir İnceleme

Alternative Dispute Resolution in Educational Settings: A Conceptual Analysis

Selahattin TURAN
Pages
78–82
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, discussing alternative dispute resolution processes, the paper concluded with implications for educational settings and recommendations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to examine alternative dispute resolution processes and their fundamental principles as well as its applicability in educational settings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First of all, the concept of conflict was explained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, discussing alternative dispute resolution processes, the paper concluded with implications for educational settings and recommendations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine alternative dispute resolution processes and their fundamental principles as well as its applicability in educational settings. First of all, the concept of conflict was explained. Second, the limitations of traditional conflict resolution processes were analyzed. Finally, discussing alternative dispute resolution processes, the paper concluded with implications for educational settings and recommendations.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, uyuşmazlık çözümünde kullanılan alternatif çatışma yönetimi tekniklerinin teorik temellerini açıklamaktır. Bu nedenle, ilkönce geleneksel çatışma ve uyuşmazlık yönetimi tekniklerinin sınırlılıkları tartışılmış ve daha sonra da alternatif çatışma yönetiminin temel ilkeleri açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu ve benzeri çalışmaların son yıllarda okullarda ve eğitim sendikalarının şiddet ve çatışma içeren eylem ve söylemlerini anlamada yardımcı olabileceği ümit edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, S. (2022). Eğitim Kurumlarında Alternatif Çatışma Yöntemi: Kavramsal Bir İnceleme. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 131, 78–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/498014

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. American Bar Association. (1989). Altemative dispııte resolulion: An ADR priıner. NVaslıington, D.C: American Bar Association. Bingham, G. (1986). Resolving enviroııınental disputes: A decade of e.vperience. NVaslıington, D.C: The Coııservatioıı Foundation. Breslin, J. W. & Rııbin, J. Z. (Eds.). (1995). Negotialioıı theoıy and praclice. Caıııbridge, MA: The Program oıı Negotialioıı at Harvaıd Lavv Sclıool. Carpenter, S. L. & Kennedy, W. J. D. (1988). Managı’ng pııblic disputes: A practical gııide to handling coııflict and reaching agreenıenls. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Coser, L.A. (1956). The fımctions ofsocial conflict. Nev York, NY: The Free Press.
  2. Curcio, J. L. & First, P. F. (1993). Violence in the schools: How ta proacıively prevenl and defııse il. Newbııry Park, CA: Corwin Press.
  3. DeJong, W. (1994). School-bascd violence prevention: Froııı the pcaceable school to the pcaceable ııeighborhood. NIDR Fonun, 25, 8-14.
  4. Fisher, R., Ury, W. & Palton, B. (1991). Getting lo yes: Negotiating agreemenl ıvithout giving in. New York, NY: Pcngııin Books. Girard, K. & Koch, S. J. (1996). Conflict resolution in the schools: A manıtal for edıtcators. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass. Goldberg, S. B., Sander F. E. A. & Rogers, N. H. (1992). Dispute resolution: Negotiation, mediation, and other processes. Boston, Mass: Little, Brown and Company. Hall, L. (Ed.). (1993). Negotiation: Strategies for ınutual gaiıı. Ncvbury Park, CA: Sage. Himes, J. S. (1980). Conflict and conflict management. Atlıcns, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
  5. Ide, W., III. (1993). ADR: A giant step tovard future. Dispute Resolution Journal, R (4), 20-24.
  6. Katz, N. H. & Lawyer, I. W. (1993). Conflict resolution: Building bridges. Newbury Park, CA: Convin Press.
  7. Katz, N. H. & Lawyer, J. W. (1994). Preventing and ınanaging conflict in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Convin Press.
  8. Kulınert, K. W. (1993). Leadership theory in postmodemist organizations. In R. T. Goleıııbievvski (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. New York: Marcel Dckker. Lantieri, L. & Patti, J. (1996). IVagiııg peace in oıtr schools. Boston, MA: Beacotı Press.
  9. McComıick, M. M. (1988). Mediation in the schools: An evaluation of the Wakefıeld pilot peer-mediation program in Tucson, Arizona. (n.p.): American Bar Association. McCucn, G. E. (1995). Clıildren of violence in America: Ideas in conflict. Hudson, VI: Gary McCtıen Pııblications. McDermott, E. P. & Berkelcy, A. E. (1996). Alternative dispute resolution in the svorkplace: