Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2009 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 153

Sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin yapılandırıcı fen öğrenme ortamı hakkındaki algılarının incelenmesi

Investigating 8th grade students' perceptions of constructivist science learning environment

Pages
38–46
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that students’ scores on the preferred form were significantly higher than those of the actual form on each scale (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study investigated 8th grade students’ perceptions of actual and preferred constructivist science learning environments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 1152 students attending public elementary schools in Ankara using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that students’ scores on the preferred form were significantly higher than those of the actual form on each scale (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study investigated 8th grade students’ perceptions of actual and preferred constructivist science learning environments. Data were collected from 1152 students attending public elementary schools in Ankara using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES). The CLES consists of two forms which are “Actual” and “Preferred”. While actual form assesses the current learning environment of the classroom and the preferred form assesses the students’ preferences about the learning environment. Results showed that students’ scores on the preferred form were significantly higher than those of the actual form on each scale (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin mevcut ve tercih ettikleri yapılandırıcı fen öğrenme ortamı hakkındaki algıları incelenmiştir. Veriler, 1152 sekizinci sınıf öğrencisinden Yapılandırıcı Öğrenme Ortamı Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Bu ölçek, “mevcut” ve “tercih edilen” öğrenme ortamını değerlendiren iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin mevcut öğrenme ortamı bölümü, sınıflardaki şu anki fen bilgisi öğrenme ortamının yapılandırıcı öğrenme yaklaşımını ne kadar yansıttığını ölçerken, tercih edilen öğrenme ortamı bölümü ise öğrencilerin tercih ettikleri öğrenme ortamını ölçmektedir. Sonuçlar, ölçeğin her alt boyutu için tercih edilen yapılandırıcı öğrenme ortamı algılarının mevcut öğrenme ortamı algılarına göre daha yüksek değerlerde olduğunu göstermiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIROĞLU, J., ÖZKAL, K., TEKKAYA, C. (2022). Sekizinci sınıf öğrencilerinin yapılandırıcı fen öğrenme ortamı hakkındaki algılarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 153, 38–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/497995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P.C., & Chen, C.-C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a crossnational study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37-55.
  2. Arisoy, N., Cakiroglu, J., & Sungur, S. (2007, April). A canonical analysis of learning environment perceptions and motivational beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL. Cakiroglu, J., Tekkaya, C., & Rakici, N. (2007). Learning environments, teacher interpersonal behavior, and students’ attitudinal outcomes in science classrooms: A Turkish context. In Mutua, K. & Sunal, C. S. (Eds.), The enterprise of education research on education in Africa, the Caribbean and the Middle East (pp. 291-311).
  3. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
  4. Dorman, J. P., Adams, J. E., & Ferguson, J. M. (2001). Psychosocial environment and student self-handicapping in secondary school mathematics classes: A cross national study. Educational Psychology, 22, 499-511.
  5. Dorman, J., & Adams, J. (2004). Associations between students’ perceptions of classroom environment and academic efficacy in Australian and British secondary schools. Westminster Studies in Education, 27, 69-85.
  6. Fisher, D. L., Henderson, D., Fraser, B. J. (1995). Interpersonal behaviour in senior high school biology classes. Research in Science Education, 25, 125-133.
  7. Fraser, B. J. & Tobin, K. (1989). Student perceptions of psychosocial environments in classrooms of exemplary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 14-34.
  8. Fraser, B. J. & Tobin, K. (Eds.) (1998). The international handbook of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  9. Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493-541), New York: Macmillan. Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.
  10. Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh, & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An interpersonal perspective (pp. 1-27). Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.
  11. Fraser, B. J., & Chionh, Y. H. (2000). Classroom environment self-esteem, achievement, and attitudes in geography and mathematics in Singapore. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Re