Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167

Anaokulunda sağlanan bilim öğrenme deneyimlerinin çocukların ilköğretim fen bilgisi derslerindeki performanslarına etkisi

Science learning experiences in kindergarten and children’s growth in science performance in elementary grades

Pages
114–127
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that the antecedent (gender and socio economic status) and propensity (aptitude and motivation) variables predicted children’s science performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aims to examine the influence of early science experiences in kindergarten on children’s growth in science performance in elementary grades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A model illustrating the relationships between the early learning experiences and later academic performance in science was developed using the opportunity-propensity framework and the model was tested using the latent growth curve modeling technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that the antecedent (gender and socio economic status) and propensity (aptitude and motivation) variables predicted children’s science performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study aims to examine the influence of early science experiences in kindergarten on children’s growth in science performance in elementary grades. The data for this study came from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Kindergarten cohort (ECLS-K). A model illustrating the relationships between the early learning experiences and later academic performance in science was developed using the opportunity-propensity framework and the model was tested using the latent growth curve modeling technique. Results indicated that the antecedent (gender and socio economic status) and propensity (aptitude and motivation) variables predicted children’s science performance. However, the science learning opportunities in kindergarten did not predict children’s growth in science performance from third grade to eighth grade.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, anaokulunda verilen erken bilim eğitimi deneyimlerinin, çocukların ilköğretim yıllarında fen bilgisi alanında gösterdiği performansın gelişmesi üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Bu çalışmada Erken Çocukluk Boylamsal Araştırması – Anaokulu (ECLS-K) verileri kullanılmıştır. Fırsat-Eğilim Modellemesi kullanılarak araştırma değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiler kuramsal olarak modellenmiş ve bu model Gizil Büyüme Eğrisi Analizi ile test edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, öncül değişkenlerin (cinsiyet ve SED) ve eğilim (yetenek ve motivasyon) değişkenlerinin çocukların fen bilgisi performanslarının anlamlı yordayıcıları olduğunu göstermiştir. Bununla beraber, anaokulunda sağlanan bilim öğrenme fırsatlarının, çocukların üç ile sekizinci sınıflar arasında fen bilgisi dersinde gösterdikleri performanstaki gelişmenin anlamlı yordayıcıları olmadığı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAÇKES, M., BELL, L. R., TRUNDLE, K. C. (2022). Anaokulunda sağlanan bilim öğrenme deneyimlerinin çocukların ilköğretim fen bilgisi derslerindeki performanslarına etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167, 114–127. https://ajindex.com/articles/497901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1995). Benchmarks for science literacy. [online]. Available: www.project2061.org. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
  2. Bodovski, K., & Farkas, G. (2007). Do instructional practices contribute to inequality in achievement? The case of mathematics instruction in kindergarten. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5(3), 301-322.
  3. Bodrova, E. (2008). Make-believe play versus academic skills: a Vygostkian approach to today’s dilemma of early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16(2), 357-369.
  4. Brecht, M., & Schmitz, D. (2008). Rules of plasticity. Science, 319(4), 39-40.
  5. Bredekamp, S. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: NAEYC. Bredekamp, S. (2006). Staying true to our principles. Journal Educating Young Children, 12(2), 21-24.
  6. Büyüktaşkapu, S., Çeliköz, N., & Akman, B. (2012). Yapılandırmacı Bilim Öğretim Programının 6 Yaş Çocuklarının Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine Etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(165), 275-292.
  7. Byrnes, J. P., & Miller, D. C. (2007). The relative importance of predictors of math and science achievement: An opportunity–propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 599–629.
  8. Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, P. A. (2009). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in kindergarten, first and third grades: An opportunity–propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 167-183.
  9. Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping and the dev elopment of concepts. Dedalus, Winter, 59-68.
  10. Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture, (pp. 169-201). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Connor, C. M., Jakobsons, L. J.,Crowe, E. C., & Meadows, J. G. (2009). Instruction, student engagement, and reading skill growth in reading first classrooms. The Elementary School Journal. 109 (3), 221-250.
  12. Early, D. M., Iruka, I. U., Ritchie, S., Barbarin, O. A., Winn, D. C., Crawford, G. M., Frome, P. M. et al., (2010). How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 177-193.
  13. Ekinci-Vural, D., & Hamurcu, H. (