SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2009 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 152

Değişen Madde ve Test Fonksiyonunun Belirlenmesinde Madde Tepki Kuramı’na Dayalı Parametrik Yöntemlerin Karşılaştırılması

A Comparison of the Parametric Methods Based on the Item Response Theory in Determining Differential item and Test Functioning

Tuncay ÖĞRETMEN
Pages
113–125
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the analyses indicated a differentiation between the results of differential item and test functioning, which were obtained using the methods in question.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to compare parametric methods based on the item response theory in determining differential item and test functioning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted on the data on the Progress in International Reading Literacy 2001 (PIRLS-2001) tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the analyses indicated a differentiation between the results of differential item and test functioning, which were obtained using the methods in question.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to compare parametric methods based on the item response theory in determining differential item and test functioning. To this end, it analyzes differential item and test functioning by using the comparison method for item parameters, the comparison method based on the likelihood ratio test, and the method to determine differential item and test functioning (DFIT) both at the item and test levels, and compares these three methods in terms of the data obtained. The study was conducted on the data on the Progress in International Reading Literacy 2001 (PIRLS-2001) tests. The results of the analyses indicated a differentiation between the results of differential item and test functioning, which were obtained using the methods in question.

Özet

Bu araştırma, değişen madde ve test fonksiyonlarını belirlemede, Madde Tepki Kuramı’na bağlı parametrik metotların karşılaştırılmasını amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, araştırma, madde parametreleri için karşılaştırma metodu, olabilirlik oranı testine dayalı karşılaştırma metodu, madde ve test düzeyinde değişen madde ve test fonksiyonlarını belirlemede kullanılan metotları kullanarak değişen madde ve test fonksiyonunu analiz etmekte ve elde edilen verilerle bu üç yöntemi karşılaştırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Uluslararası Okuma Becerilerinde Gelişim Projesi (PIRLS) 2001 testlerinden elde edilen verilerle yürütülmüştür. Bulgular, bu araştırma kapsamında kullanılan yöntemlere göre elde edilen değişen madde ve test fonksiyonu sonuçları arasında farklılık olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖĞRETMEN, T. (2022). Değişen Madde ve Test Fonksiyonunun Belirlenmesinde Madde Tepki Kuramı’na Dayalı Parametrik Yöntemlerin Karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 152, 113–125. https://ajindex.com/articles/497823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Adams, R. J., & Rowe, K. J., (1988).
  2. Item Bias in Keeves, J.P. (ed.) Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  3. Bertrand, R., & Boiteau, N. (2003). Comparing the Stability of IRT-Based and Non IRT-Based DIF Methods in Different Cultural Context Using TIMSS Data. ERIC Report-Research (143). EDRS. ED 476 924. 20p. Crane, P.K., Gibbons, L.E., Narasimhalu, K., Lai, J. S., & Cella, D. (2007). Rapid detection of differential item functioning in assessments of health-related quality of life: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy. Quality of Life Research, 16, 101–114.
  4. Crocker, L., & Algina, J., (1986) Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Devine, P. J., & Raju N. S., (1982) Extent of Overlap Among Four Item Bias Methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 1049-1066.
  5. Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). “PIRLS 2001 User Guide for the International Database”. (IEA) International Study Center, Boston College. Hambleton, R K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. London: Sage Publication. Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. IEA (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement). (n.d.). TIMSS 1999 Publications. Retrieved November 15, 2001 from http//isc.bc.edu/timss1999i/database.html Kim, S. H., & Cohen, A. S. (1995). A Comparison of Lord’s Chi-square, Raju’s Area Measures, and the Likelihood ratio Test on Detection of Differential Item Functioning. Applied Measurement in Education, 8(4), 291-312.
  6. Kim, S. H., Cohen, A. S., DiStefano, C. A., & Kim, S. (1998). An Investigation of the Likelihood Ratio Test for Detection of Differential Item Functioning Under the Partial Credit Model. ERIC Reports- Evaluative. EDRS. ED 442 837. 23 p. Korkmaz, M. (2005). Madde Cevap Kuramı’na Dayalı Olarak Çok Kategorili Maddelerde Madde ve Test Yanlılığının (İşlevsel Farklılığın) İncelenmesi. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Ege University, Department of Psychology. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of Item ResponseTtheory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Master, G. N. (1982). A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring. Psychometrica, 47, 149-174.
  7. Mc Carty, F. A., Oshima, T. C., & Raju, N.S. (2002). Identifying possible sources of differential functioning using differential bundle functioning with polytomous scor