SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2012 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 166

Türk ergenlerde özerklik ve avrupa dil gelişim dosyası kullanımı

Autonomy and european language portfolio use among Turkish adolescents

Nehir SERT
Şener BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK
John ADAMSON
Pages
129–140
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the ELPU was not supported with autonomy promoting strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the difference between perceptions among adolescents towards autonomy considering the European Language Portfolio Use (ELPU) and the effects of autonomy and ELPU on English attainment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It further scrutinizes how European Language Portfolios (ELP) and autonomy promoting strategies are used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the ELPU was not supported with autonomy promoting strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the difference between perceptions among adolescents towards autonomy considering the European Language Portfolio Use (ELPU) and the effects of autonomy and ELPU on English attainment. It further scrutinizes how European Language Portfolios (ELP) and autonomy promoting strategies are used. The participants comprised 309 6th-8th year students in their early adolescence and 11 teachers in two private primary schools in Ankara and Adana. A ‘sequential explanatory’ research design was applied. Results revealed that the students who did not use ELP scored higher on the ‘Adolescent Autonomy Scale’ and ‘Language Learning Autonomy Scale (LLAS)’ than those who used ELPs. LLAS scores were the significant predictors of the English attainment. Furthermore, the ELPU was not supported with autonomy promoting strategies.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Avrupa Dil Gelişim Dosyası (ADGD) kullanımı dikkate alındığında ergenlerin özerklik algılarının farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını ve ADGD kullanımı ve özerklik gelişimlerinin İngilizce başarıları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Ayrıca, ADGD’nin ve özerklik geliştirmeye yönelik stratejilerin nasıl kullanıldığı mercek altına alınmıştır. Çalışmanın katılımcıları Ankara ve Adana’da iki özel ilköğretim okulundaki erken ergenlik döneminde olan 309 6-8. Sınıf öğrencisi ve 11 öğretmendir. ‘Aşamalı açıklayıcı’ araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar ADGD kullanmayan öğrencilerin ‘Ergen Özerklik Ölçeği’ ve ‘Dil Öğrenme Özerklik Ölçeği’ puanlarının ADGD kullanan öğrencilerden daha yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. ‘Dil Öğrenme Özerklik Ölçeği’ puanları İngilizce başarısının anlamlı yordayıcısıdır. Ayrıca, ADGD kullanımının özerk öğrenme stratejileriyle desteklenmediği anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERT, N., BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş., ADAMSON, J. (2022). Türk ergenlerde özerklik ve avrupa dil gelişim dosyası kullanımı. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 166, 129–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/497618

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Barber, B. K., &. Olsen J. A. (1997). Socialization in context: Connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school, and neighbourhood, and with peers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 287-315.
  2. Beckert, T. E. (2005). Fostering autonomy in adolescents: a model of cognitive autonomy and selfevaluation. [Online] Retrieved on 12 January, 2010, at URL: http://aabss.org/journal2005/ AABSS%20Article%207%20FOSTERING%20AUTONOMY.pdf Çakır, S. G., & Aydın, G. (2005). Parental attitudes and ego identity status of Turkish Adolescents. Adolescence, 40, 847-859.
  3. Collins, W. A., & Repinski, D. J. (1994). Relationships during adolescence: Continuity and change in interpersonal perspective. In R. Montemayor, G.R. Adams, & T.P. Gullotta (Eds.), Advances in adolescent development: Vol. 6. Personal relationships during adolescence. (pp. 7-36),
  4. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cook-Benjamin, L. (2001). Portfolio assessment: Benefits, issues of implementation, and reflections on its use.Assessment Update, 13, 6-7.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage. Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Eccles, J. S., Early D., Frasier K., Belansky E., & McCarthy K. (1997). The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ functioning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12, 263-286.
  7. Holec, H., 1981: Autonomy and foreign language learning, Oxford: Pergamon. Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 36(4), 403-422.
  8. Kobak, R., & Cole, H. (1994). Attachment and meta-monitoring: Implications for adolescent autonomy and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & S.L. Toth (Eds.), Rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology: Vol. 5: Disorders and dysfunctions of the self (pp.267- 297). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
  9. Lambin, D. V., & Walker, V. L. (1994). Planning for portfolio assessment. Arithmetic Teacher, 41, 318-324.
  10. Little, D. (2000). We’re all in it together: Exploring the interdependence of teacher and learner autonomy. Proceeding of the 7th Nordic Conference and Workshop on Autonomous Language Learning, Helsinki, September 7th, 2000. Retrieved on 14 August, 2009, at URL: http://www.iatefl.org.pl/sig/al/all.html.
  11. Little, D. (2002). The European Language Portfolio: structure, origins, implementation and challenge