SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 169

Investigation of Turkish adolescents emotional autonomy in terms of some demographic variables

Türkiye'de ergenlerin duygusal özerkliklerinin bazı demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi

Aysel ÇOBAN ESEN
Pages
357–371
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that dimensions of emotional autonomy demonstrate differences in terms of age, gender, and parental status.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the relationship among age, gender, and parental status with adolescents autonomy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research group consisted of 6061 adolescents including 2879 females and 3163 males.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that dimensions of emotional autonomy demonstrate differences in terms of age, gender, and parental status.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship among age, gender, and parental status with adolescents autonomy. The research group consisted of 6061 adolescents including 2879 females and 3163 males. The data collection instrument was the Emotional Autonomy Scale. The data was analyzed by computing t-test and ANOVA in SPSS programme. The findings revealed that dimensions of emotional autonomy demonstrate differences in terms of age, gender, and parental status. There were high mean scores for males in terms of deidealization, similarly females exhibited high mean scores in nondependency dimension. In terms of age, the adolescents of 14 and 15 years of age have higher mean scores than 18 year- olds in deidealization and nondependency dimensions. With respect to parental status, the adolescents whose parents are married feel more emotional autonomy in deidealization and nondependency dimensions.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, yaş, cinsiyet ve ana-baba birliktelik durumlarının ergen özerkliğiyle ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırma grubu 2879u kız, 3163ü erkek olmak üzere 6061 ergenden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada veri toplamak amacı ile Duygusal Özerklik Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler SPSS programında ANOVA ve t-testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgularda, duygusal özerklik boyutunda yaş, cinsiyet ve ana-baba birliktelik durumuna göre farklılıklar olduğu görülmektedir. Erkeklerin idealleştirmeme boyutunda, kızların da bağımsızlık boyutunda ortalamalarının yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yaş değişkenine göre, idealleştirmeme ve bağımsızlık boyutlarında 14 ve 15 yaşındaki ergenlerin ortalamalarının 18 yaş ergenlerine göre daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Ana-baba birliktelik durumuna göre ise, evli olan ailelerin çocuklarının idealleştirmeme ve bağımsızlık boyutlarında daha fazla duygusal özerklik hissettikleri saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESEN, A. Ç. (2022). Investigation of Turkish adolescents emotional autonomy in terms of some demographic variables. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 169, 357–371. https://ajindex.com/articles/497569

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bomar, J. & Sabatelli, R. M. (1996). Family system dynamics, gender and psychosocial maturity in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 421-439.
  2. Çelen, N., & Çok, F. (2001). Decisisonal autonomy in Turkish adolescents from parental perspective, X. European Conference of Developmental Psychology, Aug. 22-26,
  3. Uppsala, Greece. Çelen, N. & Çok, F. (2006). Adolescents in Turkey. (In) Routledge International Encylopedia of Adolescence (Eds: J.J. Arnett). Routledge; NY. 1010–1024. Chen, Z., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1998). Relating aspects of adolescent emotional autonomy to academic achievement and deviant behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 293–319. Collins, W. A., Gleason, T. & Sesma, A. (1997). Internalization, autonomy, and relationships: Development during adolescence. In J. E. Grusec, & L. Kyczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values (pp. 78–99). New York: Wiley. Dasgupta, S. S. (1989). On the trail of an uncertain dream:Indian Immigrant Experiences in America. New York: AMS. Day, D. M., Peterson-Badali, M., & Shea, B., (2002). Parenting Style as a Context for the Development of Adolescents Thinking About Rights. ED. 464 746, (www.eric.ed.gov). Deniz, M. (2010).
  4. Ergenlerde Sır Saklamanın Duygusal, Gelişimsel Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi,
  5. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  6. Eccles, J. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. Lerner and L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent pschology, New York: Wiley, Feldman, S. S., & Quatman, T. (1988). Factors influencing age expectations for adolescent autonomy: A study of early adolescents and parents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 325- 343. Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., & Jahng, S. (2010). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: The role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of research on Adolescence, 21(3), 649-661.
  7. Fleming, M. (2005). Adolescent autonomy: Desire, achievement and disobeying parents between early and late adolescence. Australian Journal of Education and Developmental Psychology, 5, 1-16.
  8. Freud, A. (1958). Adolescence. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 13, 255-278.
  9. Kandel, D. B., & Lesser, G. S. (1972). Youth in Two Worlds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 4, 403-422.
  10. Lewıs, C