SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167

Okul yöneticilerinin yaşam kalitesinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi

Evaluation of school administrator’s life quality in terms of some certain variables

İsmail AYDOĞAN
Pages
327–335
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was also a positive correlation between self-esteem and life quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, whether or not school administrators’ life quality and self-esteem levels differed inrespect to their gender and economic levels was inquired.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data used in the study were collected through scales.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was also a positive correlation between self-esteem and life quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, whether or not school administrators’ life quality and self-esteem levels differed inrespect to their gender and economic levels was inquired. Data used in the study were collected through scales. This study revealed that in social and environmental sub-categories, the life quality of male administrators was found to be higher, but such difference did not exist among genders in physical, mental and self-esteem categories. On the other hand, administrators whose economic situation was good were also observed to have a relatively high quality of life. There was also a positive correlation between self-esteem and life quality.

Özet

Bu çalışmada okul yöneticilerinin, cinsiyet ve ekonomik durumlarına göre yaşam kalitesi ve benlik saygısı düzeylerinin değişip değişmediği incelenmiştir. Araştırmada veriler ölçeklerle toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, sosyal ve çevre alt boyutlarında yaşam kalitesinin erkek yöneticilerde daha yüksek görüldüğü, bedensel, ruhsal ve benlik saygısı boyutlarında cinsiyetler arası farklılığın oluşmadığı gözlenmiştir. Öte yandan ekonomik durumu iyi olan yöneticilerin yaşam kalitesinin de yüksek olduğu gözlenmiştir. Aynı zamanda benlik saygısı ile yaşam kalite arasında pozitif bir korelasyon olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDOĞAN, İ. (2022). Okul yöneticilerinin yaşam kalitesinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167, 327–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/497562

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abbey, A., & Andrews F.M. (1985). Modeling the psychological determinants of life quality. Social Indicators Research 16, 1-34.
  2. Abdel-Khalek, A.M. (2010). Quality of life, subjective well-being and religiosity in muslim college students. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1133–1143.
  3. Abu-Omar, K., Rütten, A., & Lehtinen, V. (2004). Mental health and physical activity in the European Union. Soz Praventivmed, 49(5), 301–309.
  4. Adams, J.F. (1995). Understanding adolescence. (Ed. Bekir Onur). İstanbul: İmge Publishing House Publications. Aktuğ, T. (2006). Examination of peer pressure and self respect in teenagers. Unpublished post graduate thesis, Mersin University Institute of Social Sciences, Mersin. Annak, B. B. (2005). Social support, social network, life quality and life satisfaction: A comparison between mood and anxiety disorder diagnosed people and regular hemodialysis receiving patients. Unpublished master’s thesis, Mersin University, Mersin. Aysan, F. (1988). Analyses of the coping strategies of high school students in their stress lives in terms of certain variables. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  5. Ayyash-Abdo, H., & Alamuddin, R. (2007). Predictors of subjective well-being among college youth in Lebanon. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(3), 265–284.
  6. Bowling, A. (2001). Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  7. Bradford, R., Rutherford, D. L., & John, A. (2002). Quality of life in young people: Ratings and factor structure of the quality of life profile-adolescent version. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 261–274.
  8. Campbell A., Converse P. E., & Rodgers W. L (1976). The quality of American life. New York; Russell Sage Foundation. Carr J.A., Gibson B., Robinson P. G. (2001). Measuring of life is quality of life determined by expectations or experience. British Medical Journal, 322, 1240-1243.
  9. Çuhadaroglu, F. (1986). Self-perception in adolescence. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Hacettepe University Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.
  10. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective wellbeing: Anomothetic and idiographic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 926–935.
  11. Diener, E., Sandvik E. Seidlitz L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute. Social Indicators Research, 28, 195–223.
  12. Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A.(2005). L