Journals / Eğitim ve Bilim / 2013 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167

Kimyasal bileşiklerin adlandırılması konusunun öğretilmesinde jigsaw tekniğinin etkileri

Effects of jigsaw on teaching chemical nomenclature

Pages
256–272
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, incomplete information and frequent faults were observed in the students of both groups concerning the chemical nomenclature after their responses to the achievement test applied prior to and following the application were examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the objective was to determine the effects of the jigsaw on the academic achievements of the students in chemical nomenclature of the general chemistry course and to specify the student opinions with respect to the learning process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research sampling was composed of the students of two different classes attending the general chemistry course at the department of secondary school science and mathematics education of a university in Turkey during 2008-2009 academic year by using an experimental pattern including a pre-test & posttest control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, incomplete information and frequent faults were observed in the students of both groups concerning the chemical nomenclature after their responses to the achievement test applied prior to and following the application were examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the objective was to determine the effects of the jigsaw on the academic achievements of the students in chemical nomenclature of the general chemistry course and to specify the student opinions with respect to the learning process. Research sampling was composed of the students of two different classes attending the general chemistry course at the department of secondary school science and mathematics education of a university in Turkey during 2008-2009 academic year by using an experimental pattern including a pre-test & posttest control group. At the end of the research, a positive difference was observed in favour of the experimental group between the academic achievements of the students to whom Jigsaw and traditional teaching method were applied. As a result of the semi-structured interviews with the students, students of the experimental group stated that “they did not think that they could be successful to this extent with the traditional teaching method”. Furthermore, incomplete information and frequent faults were observed in the students of both groups concerning the chemical nomenclature after their responses to the achievement test applied prior to and following the application were examined.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, genel kimya dersi kimyasal bileşiklerin adlandırılması konusunda jigsaw tekniğinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkileri ve öğrenme sürecine yönelik öğrenci görüşlerinin belirlenmesi hedeflenmiştir. Araştırma öntest - sontest kontrol gruplu deneysel desen kullanılarak 2008–2009 eğitim-öğretim yılında Türkiye’deki bir üniversitenin ortaöğretim fen ve matematik alanları eğitimi bölümünde genel kimya dersini alan 2 farklı şubedeki öğrenciler ile yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, jigsaw tekniği ve geleneksel öğretme yöntemi uygulanan öğrencilerin akademik başarıları arasında deney grubu yönünde olumlu bir fark olduğu bulunmuştur. Öğrenciler ile yapılan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler sonucunda, deney grubunda bulunan öğrenciler, “geleneksel öğretme yöntemi ile bu derece başarılı olacaklarını düşünmedikleri” yönünde görüş belirtmişlerdir. Ayrıca deney grubunda bulunan öğrencilerin uygulama öncesinde ve sonrasında yapılan başarı testine verdikleri cevaplar incelenerek kimyasal bileşiklerin adlandırılması konusunda öğrencilerin bilgi eksiklikleri ve sıklıkla yaptıkları hatalar tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALPAT, Ş., TURAÇOĞLU, İ., ELLEZ, A. M. (2022). Kimyasal bileşiklerin adlandırılması konusunun öğretilmesinde jigsaw tekniğinin etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 167, 256–272. https://ajindex.com/articles/497503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2004). Aktif öğrenme. İzmir:
  2. Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.
  3. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills: CA: Sage. Avşar, Z., & Alkış, S. (2007). The effect of cooperative learning “jigsaw” technique on student success in social studies course, İlköğretim Online, 6(2), 197-203. [Online]: http://ilkogretimonline.org.tr.
  4. Beran, A., & Brady, J. E. (1990). Laboratory manual general chemistry principles&Structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Berger, R., & Hazne, M. (2005). The jigsaw method in the upper secondary school physics- its impact on motivation, learning and achievement. Proceeding of the Fifth International Conference of ESERA. 28August- 1 September, 1581-1583
  5. Barcelona. Bilgin, İ., & Karaduman, A. (2005). İşbirlikli öğrenmenin 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen dersine karşı tutumlarına etkisinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 4(2), 32-45. [Online]: http:// ilkogretim-online.org.tr. Bowen, C. W. (2000). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement, Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 116-119.
  6. Burns, R. A. (1999).
  7. Fundamentals of chemistry, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, İnc. Simon&Schuster/A Viocom Company. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007a). Deneysel desenler. Ankara:
  8. PegemA Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007b). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (8. Baskı). Ankara:
  9. Pegem A. Capps, K. (2008). Chemistry taboo: An active learning game for the general chemistry classroom, Journal of Chemical Education, 85(4), 517-518.
  10. Chimeno, J. (2000). How to make learning chemical nomeclature fun, exciting and palatable, Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 144. Chimeno, J., Wulfsberg, G. P., Sanger, M. J., & Melton. T. J. (2006). The rainbow wheel and rainbow matrix: two effective tools for learning ionic nomenclature, Journal of Chemical Education, 83(4), 651-654.
  11. Colosi, J. C., Zales, C. R., & Rappe. C. (1998). Jigsaw cooperative learning improves biology lab course, Bioscience, 48(2), 118-124.
  12. Crute, T. D. (2000). Classroom nomenclature games: BİNGO, Journal of Chemical Education, 77(4), 781. Dewey, J. (1972). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books. Dufy, T. M., & Jonassen D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implication for instructional technology?, Educational Technology, 23, 2-11.
  13. Doymus, K. (2007). Effects of a cooperative learning strategy on teaching and learning phases of matter and one-component phase diagrams. Jou