SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

WHAT IS CEIT? HOW TO DEFINE IT? THE JOURNEY STARTING FROM SCHOOL MUSEUMS TO HUMAN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES

BÖTE NEDİR? NASIL TANIMLANIR? OKUL MÜZESİYLE BAŞLAYAN SERÜVENDEN İNSAN PERFORMANS TEKNOLOJİLERİNE UZANAN YOLCULUK

Hasan ÇAKIR
Ayça ÇEBİ
Seher ÖZCAN
Pages
102–111
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, information concerning performance technologies,originated from educational technologies and later covered all, were given and jobopportunities for a graduate of CEIT were briefly discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This letter is an attempt to introduce the department of Computer Education andInstructional Technology (CEIT) and to describe the concepts in the field and relationsamong them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Technologies which are fundamental constituents of the field,influential relations of the learning approaches to the field and instructional systemsdevelopment were elaborated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, information concerning performance technologies,originated from educational technologies and later covered all, were given and jobopportunities for a graduate of CEIT were briefly discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This letter is an attempt to introduce the department of Computer Education andInstructional Technology (CEIT) and to describe the concepts in the field and relationsamong them. To this end, educational and instructional technology, basic concepts in thefield, were explained initially. Technologies which are fundamental constituents of the field,influential relations of the learning approaches to the field and instructional systemsdevelopment were elaborated. Finally, information concerning performance technologies,originated from educational technologies and later covered all, were given and jobopportunities for a graduate of CEIT were briefly discussed.

Özet

Bu mektupta Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü (BÖTE)'nü tanıtmak,alandaki kavramları ve bu kavramlar arasındaki ilişkiler açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçlaöncelikle alandaki temel kavramlar olan eğitim ve öğretim teknolojisi kavramlarınıntanımlarına yer verilmiştir. Ayrıca alanın temel bileşenleri olan teknolojilerine, öğrenmeyaklaşımlarının alana etkilerine ve öğretim sistemleri geliştirme kavramlarına dadeğinilmiştir. Çalışmada son olarak eğitim teknolojilerinden doğan ancak daha sonra onu dakapsayan performans teknolojileri hakkında bilgi verilmiş ve bir BÖTE mezunun kendinehangi alanlarda yer bulabileceği kısaca açıklanmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, H., ÇEBİ, A., ÖZCAN, S. (2022). WHAT IS CEIT? HOW TO DEFINE IT? THE JOURNEY STARTING FROM SCHOOL MUSEUMS TO HUMAN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 102–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/497294

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Alessi, S. M., ve Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2005a). Radical behaviorism. In Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 29-69).
  2. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2005b). Cognitive information processing. In Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 71-110).
  3. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2005c). Constructivism. In Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 384-410).
  4. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2007). Psychological foundations of instructional design. In R. A. Reiser (Ed.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 36-44).
  5. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Duffy, T. M., ve Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction. In David H. Jonassen (Ed.). Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Macmillan. Ertmer, P. A., ve Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.
  6. Gagne, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.G., ve Keller, J.M. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Toronto, ON: Thomson Wadsworth. Januszewski, A., ve Persichitte, K. A. (2008). A history of the AECT's definitions of educational technology. In A. Januszewski& M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology (pp. 259-282). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Jonassen, D. H. (1990). Toward a constructivist view of instructional design. Educational Technology, 30(10), 32-34.
  7. Molenda, M., Pershing, J.A., ve Reigeluth, C.M. (1996). Designing instructional systems. In Robert Craig (Ed.), The ASTD Training and Development Handbook, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., ve Kemp J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction(4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Pershing, J. (2006). Human performance technology fundamentals. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.) (2006), Handbook of human performance technology (3rd ed.) (pp. 5-34). San Francisco: Pfeiffer. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (ed.), Instructional-design theories and models volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory, (pp. 1-29).
  8. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional desi