Journals / Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Developments in Transformational School Leadership Research: A Systematic Review

Pages
814–830
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Suggestions from quantitative studies echoed the need for conducting relevant studies on different samples and expanding qualitative studies to inquiry into transformationalleadership.Results,therefore,mirroredthefactthattheempiricalbaseon transformational leadership is lacking in terms of mediator and moderator effects of various variables along with the antecedents and results of transformational leadership.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to outline the nature of empirical base on transformational leadership in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study included a total of 109 graduate theses conducted on school principals’ transformational leadership behaviors between 2000 and 2019 and released in the Council of Higher Education’s (CoHE) database.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Suggestions from quantitative studies echoed the need for conducting relevant studies on different samples and expanding qualitative studies to inquiry into transformationalleadership.Results,therefore,mirroredthefactthattheempiricalbaseon transformational leadership is lacking in terms of mediator and moderator effects of various variables along with the antecedents and results of transformational leadership.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to outline the nature of empirical base on transformational leadership in Turkey. The present study included a total of 109 graduate theses conducted on school principals’ transformational leadership behaviors between 2000 and 2019 and released in the Council of Higher Education’s (CoHE) database. Results revealed that an important body of research investigatedtherelationshipbetweentransformationalleadershipandjobsatisfactionand organizational commitment. Authors’ suggestions to policymakers and practitioners were often about enablingfurtherin-servicetrainingactivitiesandprovidingschoolprincipalswithvarious opportunities to study for a master's degree. Suggestions from quantitative studies echoed the need for conducting relevant studies on different samples and expanding qualitative studies to inquiry into transformationalleadership.Results,therefore,mirroredthefactthattheempiricalbaseon transformational leadership is lacking in terms of mediator and moderator effects of various variables along with the antecedents and results of transformational leadership.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILINÇ, A. Ç., POLATCAN, M., YALDIZ, T. (2022). Developments in Transformational School Leadership Research: A Systematic Review. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 814–830. https://ajindex.com/articles/496977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Barnett, K., & McCormick, J. (2004). Leadership and individual principal-teacher relationships in schools.Educational Administration Quarterly,40(3), 406-434. doi:10.1177/0013161X03261742 Allix, N. M. (2000). Transformational leadership: democratic or despotic? Educational Management & Administration,28(1), 7-20. doi:10.1177/0263211x000281002 Ayık, A., Diş, O. veÇelik, Z. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik rolleri ile okulların değişime açıklığı arasındaki ilişki.Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi,24(2), 547-564. Bass,B. M. (1985) Model of transformational leadership. In T.F. Mech & G.B. McCabe (Eds.), Leadership and academic librarians (pp. 66–82).
  2. Westport, CT: Greenwood. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision.Organizational Dynamics,18(3), 19-31. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond.Journal of European Industrial Training,14(5), 21-27. doi:10.1108/03090599010135122 Bass,B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership and organizational culture.Public Administration Quarterly, 17, 112-121.
  3. Bass, B. M. (1995). Comment: Transformational leadership: Looking at other possible antecedents and consequences.Journalof Management Inquiry,4(3), 293-297. doi:10.1177/105649269543010 Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives.Educational Administration Quarterly,35(3), 349-378. doi:10.1177/0013161X99353003 Buluç, B. (2010). İlköğretim okullarında bürokratik okul yapısı ile okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri arasındaki ilişki.Eğitim ve Bilim,34(152), 72-85.
  4. Cemaloğlu, N. veKılınç, A. Ç. (2012). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel güven düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki.Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,1(23), 132-156.
  5. Çoğaltay, N., Karadağ, E. ve Öztekin, Ö. (2014). Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü liderlik davranışlarının öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığına etkisi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi [Educational Administration: Theory and Practice], 20(4), 483-500. doi: 10.14527/kuey.2014.019 EPPI-Centre (2006). EPPI-Centre methods for conducting systematic reviews. http://pblevaluation.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/14976232/EPPI-Centre_Review_Methods_1.pdfadresine 20/12/2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir. Gough, D. (2007). Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the qual