Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2013 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

An ıntegrated approach based on grey system theory for personnel selection

Personel seçimi için gri sistem teori tabanlı bütünleşik bir yaklaşım

Pages
461–471
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Out comes show that GIA can be used successfully in the process of solving personnel selection problems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Grey Relational Analysis (GIA) means measurement of variable relationship between two elements in a system ortwosubsystems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There lational grade between two factors in GIA is obtained by comparing geometrical pattern’s of factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Out comes show that GIA can be used successfully in the process of solving personnel selection problems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Grey Relational Analysis (GIA) means measurement of variable relationship between two elements in a system ortwosubsystems. There lational grade between two factors in GIA is obtained by comparing geometrical pattern’s of factors. It is mentioned that the more thepatterns displayed by factors similar to each other thes tronger there lationship between factors are. In this study GIA and Grey Analytic Network Process (GANP) are used integral lytosolve group decision making problems in which both subjective and objective criteria are taking place. As a case study personnel selection problem of an education institution is handled. Out comes show that GIA can be used successfully in the process of solving personnel selection problems.

Özet

Gri İlişkisel Analiz (GİA) belirli bir sistem içerisinde iki eleman ya da iki alt sistem arasında değişen ilişkinin ölçümünü ifade eder. GİA’ de iki faktör arasındaki ilişkinin derecesi, faktörlerin sergilemiş oldukları seyirlerin geometrik olarak karşılaştırılma- sı ile elde edilir. Faktörlerin sergilemiş oldukları seyir geometrik olarak birbirine ne kadar çok benzerse aradaki ilişkinin o den- li güçlü olduğundan bahsedilir. Bu çalışmada hem sübjektif hem de objektif kriterlerin yer aldığı grup karar verme prob- lemlerinin çözümü için GİA ve Gri Analitik Ağ Süreci (GANP) bütünleşik olarak kullanılmıştır. Örnek uygulama olarak eğitim hizmetleri sağlayan bir kurum için personel seçim problemi ele alınmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar GİA’ in personel seçim prob- lemlerinin çözümü aşamasında başarı ile uygulanabileceğini göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSE, E., KABAK, M., APLAK, H. S. (2022). An ıntegrated approach based on grey system theory for personnel selection. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 461–471. https://ajindex.com/articles/495381

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ayub, M., Kabir, J. ve Alam, G.R. (2009) “Personnel Selection Method Using Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Fuzzy Concept” 12th International Conference on Computerand Information Technology, 373-377.
  2. Chen, M.F. ve Tzeng, G.H. (2004) “Combining GreyRelationand Topsis Conceptsfor Selecting an Expat- riate Host Country”Mathematical and Computer Model- ling, 40:1473-1490.
  3. Chen, C.H. ve Tzeng, G.H. (2011) “Assessment Model for Improving Educational Curriculum Materials Based on The DANP Techniquewith Grey Relational Analysis”IJISLM, 6(2): 23-36.
  4. Chen, C.T., Hwang, Y.C. ve Hung, W.Z. (2009) “Applying Multiple Linguistic PROMETHEE Method for Personnel Evaluation and Selection” IEEE International Conference, 1312-1316.
  5. Deng, J.L. (1982) “Control Problems of Grey Systems” Systems& Control Letters, 5: 288-294.
  6. Deng, J.L. (1996) “Difference among Grey, Probability, Fuzzy” Journal of Grey System, 3: 256-262.
  7. Dursun, M. ve Karsak, E.E. (2010) “A Fuzzy MCDM Approachfor Personnel Selection” Expert Systemswith Applications, 37:4324-4330.
  8. Feng, C.M. ve Wang,R.T. (2000) “Performance Evalu- ation for Airlines Including The Consideration Financial Ratios” Journal of Air Transport Management, 6:133-142.
  9. Gibney, R. ve Shang, J. (2007) “Decision-Making in Academia: A Case of The Dean Selection Process” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46:1030-1040.
  10. Goyal, S. ve Grover, S. (2012) “Applying Fuzzy Grey Relational Analysis for Ranking The Advanced Manu- facturing Systems”Grey Systems: Theoryand Application, 2(2):284-298.
  11. Güngör, Z., Serhadlıoğlu, G. ve Kesen, S.E. (2009) “A fuzzy AHP Approach to Personnel Selection” Applied Soft Computing, 9:641-646.
  12. Hsu, P.F. (2012) “Selection Model Based on ANP and GRA for Independent Media Agencies” Quality & Quantity, 46(1): 1-17.
  13. Jadidi, O., Hong, T.S., Firouzi, F. ve Yusuf, R.M. (2008) “An Optimal Grey Based Approach Based on TOPSIS Concepts for Supplier Selection Problem” International Journal of Management Scienceand Engineering Management, 4(2):104-117.
  14. Jharkharia, S. ve Shankar, R. (2007) “Selection of Logistics Service Provider: An Analytic Network Process (ANP) Approach” Omega, 35:274-289.
  15. Kabak, M., Burmaoğlu, S. ve Kazancoğlu, Y. (2012) “A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Professional Selection”Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3):3516-3525.
  16. Kelemenis, A.M. ve Askounis, D. (2010) “A New TOPSIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach to Personnel Selection” Expert Systemswith Applications, 37(7):4999-5008.
  17. Kose, E., Temiz, I. ve Erol, S.(