Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Facility location selection for a public organization by stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis

Stokastik çok kriterli kabul edilebilirlik analizi ile bir kamu kurumu için tesis yeri seçimi

Pages
361–369
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the study Stochastic Multi-Criteria Acceptability Analysis-TRI (SMAA-TRI) is used as the method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The facility location problem, especially in the last 50 years, is an area where too many studies occur.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Rapidly evolving technology, environmental factors, the necessity to reduce operation costs required to compete and many factors such as changes in customer perception of satisfaction force cost effective solutions by using scientific methods for these problems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the study Stochastic Multi-Criteria Acceptability Analysis-TRI (SMAA-TRI) is used as the method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The facility location problem, especially in the last 50 years, is an area where too many studies occur. Rapidly evolving technology, environmental factors, the necessity to reduce operation costs required to compete and many factors such as changes in customer perception of satisfaction force cost effective solutions by using scientific methods for these problems. In this study, a real life public sector facility location problem is examined. The problem fundamentally originated from the desire of public sector to downsize the number of service centers stationed in various cities and towns countrywide. Existing facilities are sorted in two groups as facilities which stay opened and facilities which should be closed according to criteria determined by general management. In the study Stochastic Multi-Criteria Acceptability Analysis-TRI (SMAA-TRI) is used as the method.

Özet

Tesis yeri seçimi, özellikle son 50 yıldır birçok çalışmanın ya-pıldığı bir problem sahasıdır. Hızla gelişen teknoloji, çevresel etkenler, rekabet için işletme maliyetlerinin azaltılması gerek- liliği, müşterilerin memnuniyet algılarındaki değişim gibi bir-çok faktör bu problemler için bilimsel yöntemler kullanılarak maliyet etkin çözümler bulunmasını gerektirmektedir. Bu ça-lışmada, bir kamu kurumuna ait tesis yeri seçimi problemi içinçözüm önerilmiştir. Problem, temel olarak kamu kurumununülke genelinde il ve ilçelerde konuşlu hizmet merkezi sayısı- nı azaltmak istemesinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Mevcut tesis-ler kamu kurumunun genel yönetimi tarafından belirlenen kriterlere göre değerlendirilmiş, açık tutulması gerekenler vekapatılması gerekenler olarak iki sınıfa ayrılmıştır. Çalışmada yöntem olarak Stokastik Çok Kriterli Kabul Edilebilirlik Analizi-TRI (SMAA-TRI) kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSE, E., KABAK, M., KARABAY, S. (2022). Facility location selection for a public organization by stochastic multi-criteria acceptability analysis. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 361–369. https://ajindex.com/articles/495374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Badri, M.A. (1999) “Combining the Analytic Hie- rarchy Process and Goal Programming for Global Faci- lity Location Allocation Problem” International Journal of Production Economics, 62(3):237-248.
  2. Blin, J.M. (1974) “Fuzzy Relations in Group Decisi- on Theory” Journal of Cybernetics, 4:17-22.
  3. Chou, T.Y., Hsu, C.L. ve Chen, M.C. (2008) “A fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Model for International Tourist Hotels Location Selection” International Journal of Hospi- tality Management, 27:293-301.
  4. Farahani, R.Z., Steadie, Seifi M. ve Asgari, N. (2010) “Multiple Criteria Facility Location Problems: A Survey” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34:1689-1709.
  5. Figueira, J., Greco, S. ve Ehrgott, M. (Eds.) (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, New York, Springer Science&Business Media, Inc. Güneri, A.F., Cengiz, M. ve Şeker, S. (2009) “A fuzzy ANP Approach for Shipyard Location Selection” Expert Systems with Applications, 36:7992-7999.
  6. Hokkanen, J., Lahdelma, R., Miettinen, K. ve Salmi- nen, P. (1998) “Determining the Implementation Order of a General Plan by Using a Multicriteria Method” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 7(5):273-284.
  7. Hokkanen, J., Lahdelma, R. ve Salminen, P. (1999) “A Multiple Criteria Decision Model for Analyzing and Choosing Among Different Development Patterns for the Helsinki Cargo Harbor” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 33:1-23.
  8. Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P. ve Lidouh, K. (2013) “Location Selection for the Construction of a Casino in the Greater London Region: A Triple Multi-Criteria Approach” Tourism Management, 34:211-220.
  9. Kahraman, C., Ruan, D. ve Doğan, İ. (2003) “Fuzzy Group Decision-Making for Facility Location Selection” Information Sciences, 157:135 -153. Kalkınma Bakanlığı (2004) http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/ bolgesel/gosterge/2004/ilce.pdf, (21.07.2013)
  10. Lahdelma, R. ve Salminen, P. (2001) “SMAA-2: Stoc- hastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making” Operations Research, 49(3):444-454.
  11. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P. ve Hokkanen, J. (2002) “Locating a Waste Treatment Facility by Using Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis with Ordinal Criteria” European Journal of Operational Research, 142(2):345- 356. Lahdelma, R., Miettinen, K. ve Salminen, P. (2003) “Ordinal Criteria in Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA)” European Journal of Operational Research,147(1):117-127.
  12. Lahdelma, R., Miettinen, K. ve Salminen, P. (2005) “Reference Point Approach for Multiple Decision