Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Return and Volatility Spillover Between Emerging Stock Markets and Precious Metals

Gelişmekte Olan Hisse Senedi Piyasaları İle Kıymetli Madenler Arasındaki Getiri ve Volatilite Yayılımı

Pages
217–230
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the model’s variance equation, there is no volatility spillover to the Turkish equity markets from precious metals therefore the result is that Turkish equity market is stronger compared to other countries’ markets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to reveal the return and volatility spillovers between developing/emerging country stock market indexes and precious metals that investors recently have concentrated on issues such as portfolio diversification and hedging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the multivariate VAR-EGARCH analysis, negative information shocks for precious metals have been found to be more dominant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the model’s variance equation, there is no volatility spillover to the Turkish equity markets from precious metals therefore the result is that Turkish equity market is stronger compared to other countries’ markets.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the return and volatility spillovers between developing/emerging country stock market indexes and precious metals that investors recently have concentrated on issues such as portfolio diversification and hedging. As a result of the multivariate VAR-EGARCH analysis, negative information shocks for precious metals have been found to be more dominant. It is proved that from gold returns to the equity markets of Indonesia, India, Brazil, Turkey have positive spillover, also from Brent oil returns to the equity markets of India, Brazil, Turkey have negative return spillover. The only market in which both of precious metals have positive return spillover has been the South African market. According to the results of the model’s variance equation, there is no volatility spillover to the Turkish equity markets from precious metals therefore the result is that Turkish equity market is stronger compared to other countries’ markets.

Özet

Bu çalışma, portföy çeşitlendirme ve risktenkorunma gibi konularda yatırımcıların son dönemdeüzerinde yoğunlaştığı kıymetli madenlerlegelişmekte olan ülke borsa endeksleri arasındakigetiri ve volatilite yayılımlarını ortaya koymayıamaçlamaktadır. Çok değişkenli VAR-EGARCHanalizi sonucunda kıymetli madenler için negatifbilgi şoklarının daha baskın olduğu tespit edilmiştir.Altın getirilerinden Endonezya, Hindistan, Brezilyave Türkiye hisse senedi piyasalarına pozitif, Brentpetrol getirilerinden ise Hindistan, Brezilya veTürkiye hisse senedi piyasalarına negatif getiriyayılımı olduğu ayrıca kanıtlanmıştır. Her iki kıymetlimadenin de pozitif getiri yayılımı olduğu tek piyasaGüney Afrika piyasası olmuştur. Modelin varyansdenklem sonuçlarına göre kıymetli madenlerdenTürkiye hisse senedi piyasasına herhangi birvolatilite yayılımı olmadığı bu sebeple diğerülke piyasaları ile kıyaslandığında Türkiye hissesenedi piyasasının daha güçlü olduğu sonucunaulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A., GÜRSOY, S., ÇELİK, İ., ÜNLÜ, H. U. (2022). Return and Volatility Spillover Between Emerging Stock Markets and Precious Metals. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 217–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/495198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Arouri, M., Lahiani, A. ve Nguyen, D. (2015) “World Gold Prices and Stock Returns in China: Insights for Hedging and Diversification Strategies”, Economic Modelling, 44: 273-282.
  2. Bhar, R. ve Nikolova, B. (2010) “Global Oil Prices, Oil Industry and Equity Returns: Russian Experience”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 57(2): 169-186.
  3. Batten, J. A., Ciner, C. ve Lucey, B.M. (2015) “Which Precious Metals Spill Over On Which, When And Why? Some Evidence”, Applied Economics Letters, 22: 466-473.
  4. Basher, S. A. ve Sadorsky, P. (2016) “Hedging Emerging Market Stock Prices with Oil, Gold, VIX, and Bonds: A Comparison Between DCC, ADCC and GO-GARCH”, Energy Economics, 54: 235-247.
  5. Bollerslev, T. (1986) “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31(3): 307-327.
  6. Bouri, E., Molnar, P., Azzi, G., Roubaud, D. ve Hagfors, L. I. (2017) “On the Hedge and Safe Haven Properties of Bitcoin: Is it Really More than Diversifier?”, Finance Research Letters, 20: 192-198.
  7. Boubaker, H. ve Raza, S. A. (2017) “A Wavelet Analysis of Mean and Volatility Spillovers Between Oil and BRICS Stock Markets”, Energy Economics, 64: 105-117.
  8. Brooks, C. ve Prokopczuky, M. (2013) “The Dynamics of Commodity Prices”, Quantitative Finance, 13(4): 1-44.
  9. Büyükşahin, B., Haigh, M. S. ve Robe, M. A. (2008) “Commodities and Equities: A Market of One ?”, The Economist, 1-47.
  10. Chang, C. L., McAleer, M. ve Tansuchat, R. (2013) “Conditional Correlations and Volatility Spillovers Between Crude Oil and Stock Index Returns”, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 116-138.
  11. Ciner, C. (2013) “Oil and Stock Returns: Frequency Domain Evidence”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 23: 1-11.
  12. Çevik, E. İ. ve Pekkaya, M. (2007) “Spot Ve Vadeli İşlem Fiyatlarının Varyansları Arasındaki Nedensellik Testi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2): 49-66.
  13. Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1979), Distribution Of The Estimators For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root. Journal of The American Statistical Association, 74: 427-431.
  14. Dickey, D. A. ve Fuller, W. A. (1981) “Likelihood Ratio Satatistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49(4): 1057-1072.
  15. Engle, R. F. (1982) “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United”, Econometrica, 50(4): 987-1007.
  16. Engle, R. F. ve Ng, V. K. (1993) “Measuring and Testing The Impact Of News On Vo