Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Sustainability Of Current Account Deficits In Fragile Five: Evidence From Non-Linear Unit Root Tests

Kırılgan Beşlide Cari Açıkların Sürdürülebilirliği: Doğrusal Olmayan Birim Kök Testleri İle Kanıtlar

Pages
121–134
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This result is important in that the central banks in the fragile five countries, except Brazil, do not face a restriction caused by current account deficit in inflation target regime.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The debate on the sustainability of current account deficit is one of the unresolved matters among economist for a long time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main purpose of this study is to analyze the issue of sustainability of current account deficits for fragile five countries by using nonlinear alternative unit root tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This result is important in that the central banks in the fragile five countries, except Brazil, do not face a restriction caused by current account deficit in inflation target regime.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The debate on the sustainability of current account deficit is one of the unresolved matters among economist for a long time. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the issue of sustainability of current account deficits for fragile five countries by using nonlinear alternative unit root tests. The findings obtained from KSS and AESTAR tests revealed that current account deficit is sustainable in countries except for Brazil. This result is important in that the central banks in the fragile five countries, except Brazil, do not face a restriction caused by current account deficit in inflation target regime.

Özet

Cari açıkların sürdürülebilirliği tartışmaları, ötedenberi iktisatçılar arasında görüş birliğine varılamamışönemli konulardandır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı,doğrusal olmayan alternatif birim kök testlerinikullanarak, cari açıkların sürdürülebilirliği sorununukırılgan beşli ülkeleri için analiz etmektir. Çalışmadakullanılan KSS ve AESTAR testlerinden eldeedilen bulgular, Brezilya dışındaki diğer ülkelerdecari açıkların sürdürülebilir olduğunu ortayakoymaktadır. Bu sonuç, kırılgan beşli ülkelerindeBrezilya hariç, merkez bankalarının enflasyonhedeflemesi rejiminde cari açık kaynaklı birkısıtlama ile karşı karşıya olmadıklarını göstermesibakımından önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, R. (2022). Sustainability Of Current Account Deficits In Fragile Five: Evidence From Non-Linear Unit Root Tests. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 121–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/495193

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Andreosso B. and Callaghan O. (2007). “Analysis of the Current Account Position of Four Asian Countries Before the 1997 Crisis”, Pasific Economic Review, Vol:12, No:1, p.47-61.
  2. Anorou E. and Ramchander S. (1998). “Current Account and Fiscal Deficits: Evidence from Five Developing Economies of Asia”, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 9, No:3, p.487-501.
  3. Apergis, N., Katrakilidis, K.P. and Tabakis, N.M., (2000). “Current Account Deficit Sustainability: The Case of Greece”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol:7, p.599-603.
  4. Bergsten, C.F., (2002). “The Dolar and The US Economy, Testonomy Before The Commiteeon Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs”, Washington, DC: United States Senate. Baharumshah, A. Z., Lau E. and Fountas S., (2003). “On The Sustainability Of Current Account Deficits: Evidence From Four ASEAN Countires”, Journal Of Asian Economics, Vol:14, p.465-487.
  5. Bordo, M., Eichhengreen, B. and Martinez-Peria, M. S., (2002). “Is the Crises Problem Growing More Severe?”, Economic Policy, Vol:16, p.53-75.
  6. Buiter, W. H., (1981). “Time Preference and Internatiınal Lending and Borrowing in an Overlapping-Generations Model”, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (4). Campa, J.M. and Gavilan, A., (2011). “Current Accounts in the Euro Area: An Intertemporal Approach”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol:30, p.228-295.
  7. Chen, S., (2011a). “Current Account Deficits and Sustainability: Evidence from The OECD Countries”, Economic Modelling, Vol:28, p.1455-1464.
  8. Chen, S., (2011b). “Are Current Account Deficits Really Sustainable in the G-7 Countries?”, Japan and the World Economy, Vol:23, p.190-201. Chen-Yin K., (2016). “Sustainability of Current Accounts: evidence from the quantile unit-root test”, Applied Economics Letters, 23:10, 747-755.
  9. Chong, T. T. L., Hinich, M. J., Liew, V. K. S., and Lim, K. P., (2008). “Time Series Test of Nonlinear Convergence and Transitional Dynamics”, Economics Letters, Vol:100, No:3, p.337-339.
  10. Christopoulos, D.K. and Leon-Ledesma, M., (2010). “Current Account Sustainability in The US: What Did We Really Know About It?”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol:29, p.442-459.
  11. Corsetti, G., Pesenti P. and Roubini N., (1999). “Paper Tigers? A model of the Asian Crisis”, European Economic Review, Vol:43, No:7, p.1211-1236.
  12. Edwards, S., (2001). “Does the Current Account Matter?”, NBER Working Paper, No:8275, p.1-38.
  13. Edwards, S., (2004). “Thirty Years of Current Account Imbalances, Current Account Reversals and Sudden Stops”, NBER Worki