Journals / Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of Psychometric Properties of the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire

Bournemouth Boyun Anketi’nin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Pages
187–193
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to explanatory factor analysis conducted to determine the number of components of the questionnaire, it was found that the questionnaire had one factorial structure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The use of the outcome measurements in the evaluation and follow-up of neck pain, which can be seen frequently in society and create a table of limitations in individuals, is of great importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The study included 73 subjects with neck pain and for analyses participants filled Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire with Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain Disability Scale and Short Form 36.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to explanatory factor analysis conducted to determine the number of components of the questionnaire, it was found that the questionnaire had one factorial structure.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The use of the outcome measurements in the evaluation and follow-up of neck pain, which can be seen frequently in society and create a table of limitations in individuals, is of great importance. The Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire, one of the patient-related questionnaires, evaluates pain and disability as well as biopsychosocial features in patients with neck pain. The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric characteristics of the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire. Materials and Methods: The study included 73 subjects with neck pain and for analyses participants filled Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire with Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain Disability Scale and Short Form 36. For testretest analysis 31 participants completed the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire again after 48 hours. Results: As a result of the analyses, the internal consistency Cronbach alpha value of the questionnaire was 0.853 and the test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.932. These values indicate that the questionnaire has a high level of reliability. As a result of Pearson’s correlation analysis, the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire was very-good correlated with the Neck Disability Index (r=0.718) and Neck Pain Disability Scale (r=0.763) and good with the related parameters of Short Form 36 ((-0.440)-(-0.594)). According to explanatory factor analysis conducted to determine the number of components of the questionnaire, it was found that the questionnaire had one factorial structure. Conclusion: In conclusion, it was found that Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire had sufficient psychometric features and appropriate to use for patients with neck pain.

Özet

Amaç: Toplum genelinde sıklıkla görülebilen ve bireylerde kısıtlılık tablosu oluşturabilen boyun ağrısının,değerlendirilmesi ve takibinde son durum ölçeklerinin kullanımı büyük önem arz etmektedir. Hasta temelli buölçeklerden biri olarak karşımıza çıkan Bournemouth Boyun Anketi, boyun ağrılı hastalarda ağrı ve özrün yanı sırabiyopsikososyal özellikleri de değerlendirmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Bournemouth Boyun Anketi’nin psikometriközelliklerinin belirlenmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 73 boyun ağrılı birey dâhil olmuş ve analizler için katılımcılar Bournemouth BoyunAnketi ile birlikte Boyun Özür İndeksi, Boyun Ağrısı Özürlülük Skalası ve Kısa Form 36 anketlerini doldurmuşlardır.Otuz bir katılımcı ise test-tekrar test analizi için Bournemouth Boyun Anketi’ni 48 saat sonra tekrar tamamlamıştır.Bulgular: Yapılan analizler sonucu anketin iç tutarlılık Cronbach alfa değerinin 0,853, test-tekrar test sınıf içikorelasyon katsayısı değerinin ise 0,932 olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu değerler anketin yüksek bir güvenirliğe sahipolduğuna işaret etmektedir. Gerçekleştirilen Pearson korelasyon analizi sonucunda Bournemouth Boyun Anketi’ninBoyun Özür İndeksi (r=0,718) ve Boyun Ağrısı Özürlülük Skalası (r=0,763) ile çok iyi düzeyde, Kısa Form 36’nın ilgiliparametreleriyle ((-0,440)-(-0,594)) ise iyi düzeyde ilişkili olduğu görülmüştür. Anketin bileşen sayısının belirlenmesiiçin yapılan açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonucu anketin tek faktörlü bir yapıya sahip olduğu bulunmuştur.Sonuç: Bu çalışma sonucunda Bournemouth Boyun Anketi’nin yeterli psikometrik özelliklere sahip olduğu ve boyunağrılı hastalarda kullanımının uygun olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAYDIN, G. (2022). Investigation of Psychometric Properties of the Bournemouth Neck Questionnaire. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 187–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/494720

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Zhang ZC, Jia ZY, Cheng YJ, Wang F, Yang YL, Li M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Simplified-Chinese version of neck bournemouth questionnaire for patients in mainland China. Spine. 2019; 44(7): E438-44
  2. Yang H, Haldeman S, Nakata A, Choi B, Delp L, Baker D. Work-related risk factors for neck pain in the US working population. Spine. 2015; 40(3): 184- 92
  3. Adams J, Peng W, Cramer H, Sundberg T, Moore C, Amorin-Woods L, et al. The prevalence, patterns, and predictors of chiropractic use among US adults. Spine. 2017; 42(23): 1810-6
  4. Groeneweg R, Assen L, Kropman H, Leopold H, Mulder J, Smits EBC, et al. Manual therapy compared with physical therapy in patients with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr & Manual Ther. 2017; 25(1): 1-12
  5. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(6): 834-48
  6. Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017; 358: j3221
  7. Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90(2): 284-99
  8. López I, Sollano VE, Corral T. Reduction of cervical and respiratory muscle strength in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain and having moderate to severe disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2018; 40(21): 2495-504
  9. Martel J, Dugas C, Lafond D, Descarreaux M. Validation of the French version of the bournemouth questionnaire. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009; 53(2): 102- 10
  10. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens A, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine. 1998; 23(18): 2003-13
  11. Parks K, Crichton K, Goldford R, McGill S. A comparison of lumbar range of motion and functional ability scores in patients with low back pain: assessment for range of motion validity. Spine. 2003; 28(4): 380-4
  12. Kose G, Hepguler S, Atamaz F, Oder G. A comparison of four disability scales for Turkish patients with neck pain. J Rehabil Med. 2007; 39(5): 358-62. 13.Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2004; 26(16): 959-62
  13. Telci EA, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE, Yagli N. The cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of neck disability index