Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 12

Market microstructure liquidity of financal assets and price formation

Piyasa mikroyapısı, finansal varlıkların likiditesi ve fiyatların oluşumu

Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recent innovations on the Istanbul Stock Exchange are also expected to enhance the liquidity and price formation of financial assets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper describes the relationship between market microstructure and the prices of financial assets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The finance literature shows that the prices of financial assets are affected by the structures of financial markets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recent innovations on the Istanbul Stock Exchange are also expected to enhance the liquidity and price formation of financial assets.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper describes the relationship between market microstructure and the prices of financial assets. The finance literature shows that the prices of financial assets are affected by the structures of financial markets. This relationship is explained by liquidity, which has traditionally been measured by the bid-ask spread. Market microstructure research considers liquidity a potential determinant of expected returns. This study also describes that link between liquidity and asset pricing, which has some implications for investment decisions of the firms and investors. The empirical evidence on this issue indicates that liquidity improvements lead to more efficient prices. Recent innovations on the Istanbul Stock Exchange are also expected to enhance the liquidity and price formation of financial assets.

Özet

Bu makale, piyasa mikroyapısı ile finansal varlıkların fiyatları arasındaki ilişkiyi anlatmaktadır. Finans literatürü, finansal varlıkların fiyatlarının, finansal piyasaların yapılarından etkilendiklerini göstermektedir. Bu ilişki, geleneksel olarak alış-satış fiyat aralığı ile ölçülen, likidite ile açıklanmaktadır. Piyasa mikroyapısı araştırmaları, likiditeyi, beklenen getirilerin potansiyel bir belirleyeni olarak ele almaktadırlar. Bu çalışma, firmaların ve yatırımcıların yatırım kararlarına ilişkin bazı yansımaları bulunan, likidite ve varlık fiyatlama arasındaki bu ilişkiyi de anlatmaktadır. Bu konudaki ampirik kanıtlar göstermektedir ki, likiditedeki gelişmeler, fiyatların daha etkin oluşmasını sağlamaktadır. İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsası’nda (İMKB) yakın zamanda uygulanan yeniliklerin de, finansal varlıkların likiditesini ve fiyat oluşumunu geliştirmesi beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, S., KAYALI, M. M. (2022). Market microstructure liquidity of financal assets and price formation. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 12, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/493656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Affleck-Graves, J., Hegde, S.H. ve Miller, R. (1994). “Trading mechanisms and the components of the bid-ask spread”, Journal of Finance, 49:1417-1488.
  2. Amihud, Y. ve Mendelson, H. (1986). “Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread”, Journal of Financial Economics, 17:223-249.
  3. Ascioglu, N.A. ve McInish, T.H. (2003). “Adverse selection costs and exchange listings”, Financial Management Association European Conference, Dublin, Ireland. Bagehot, W. (pseudonym used by Jack Treynor). (1971). “The only game in town”, Financial Analysts Journal, 8:31–53.
  4. Bildik, R. (2002). “Türk sermaye piyasası için yeni bir yatırım alternatifi: Borsada işlem gören fonlar (exchange traded funds)”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans Dergisi, 17:71-86.
  5. Brennan, M.J. ve Subrahmanyam, A. (1996). “Market microstructure and asset pricing: On the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 41:441-464.
  6. Brock, W. ve Kleidon, A. (1992). “Periodic market closure and trading volume: a model of intraday bids and asks”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 16:451-489.
  7. Brooks, R.M. (1996). “Changes in Asymmetric Information at Earnings and Dividend Announcements”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23:359-378.
  8. Chan, K., Chung, P. ve Johnson, H. (1995). “The intraday behavior of bid-ask spreads for NYSE stocks and CBOE options”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30:329-346.
  9. Chung, K.H., Van Ness, B. ve Van Ness, R. (1999). “Limit orders and the bid-ask spread”, Journal of Financial Economics, 53:255-287.
  10. Copeland, T. ve Galai, D. (1983). “Information effects and the bid-ask spread”, Journal of Finance, 38:1457-1469.
  11. Demsetz, H. (1968). “The cost of transacting”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82:33-53.
  12. Dufour, A. ve Engle, R.F. (2000). “Time and the Price Impact of a Trade”, Journal of Finance, 55:2467–98.
  13. Easley, D. ve O’Hara, M. (1987). “Price, trade size and information in securities markets”, Journal of Financial Economics, 19:69-90.
  14. Easley, D. ve O’Hara, M. (1992). “Time and the process of security price adjustment”, Journal of Finance, 47:577–605.
  15. Eleswarapu, V.R. (1997). “Cost of transacting and expected returns in the Nasdaq market”, Journal of Finance, 52:2113-2127.
  16. Fama, E.F. ve French, K.R. (1992). “The cross-section of expected returns”, Journal of Finance, 47:427–465.
  17. Glosten, L.R. ve Milgrom, P.R. (1985). “Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders”, Journal of Financial Economics,