SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17

Openness and Industrialization in Turkey After Customs Union

Gümrük Birliği Sonrasında Türkiye'de Dışa Açıklık ve Sanayileşme

Özgür TONUS
Pages
193–214
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, we try to analyse the causal relationship between trade with European Union and Turkish manufacturing sector indicators over the period of 1996-2006.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Customs Union between Turkey and the European Union was the milestone to complete the process of trade liberalization, which had already started in the early 1980s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Global economic environment and Turkey’s Structural Adjustment Programs, which has been supervised by International Monetary Found, had created transformation stage of Turkish manufacturing industry in the trade liberalization period in the late 1990s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, we try to analyse the causal relationship between trade with European Union and Turkish manufacturing sector indicators over the period of 1996-2006.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Customs Union between Turkey and the European Union was the milestone to complete the process of trade liberalization, which had already started in the early 1980s. Global economic environment and Turkey’s Structural Adjustment Programs, which has been supervised by International Monetary Found, had created transformation stage of Turkish manufacturing industry in the trade liberalization period in the late 1990s. The sector’s relative size to GDP has not changed remarkably during the last decade, while the Turkish manufacturing sectors production and export capacity have been growing. In this paper, we try to analyse the causal relationship between trade with European Union and Turkish manufacturing sector indicators over the period of 1996-2006.

Özet

Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği arasındaki Gümrük Birliği, 1980 yılında baslayan ticarî serbestlesme sürecinin önemli bir asamasını olusturmaktadır. 1990’lı yılların sonlarına doğru küresel ekonomideki gelismeler ve Türkiye’nin izlediği yapısal uyum programları serbest ticaret ortamında imalat sanayi için dönüsüm ortamı yaratmıstır. 2000’li yıllarda imalat sanayinin üretim hacminin ve ihracatının artmasına rağmen ekonomi içindeki nisbi ağırlığının değismemesi sanayilesme süreci açısından sorgulanmalıdır. Bu çalısmada 1996–2006 döneminde, Avrupa Birliği ile Türkiye arasındaki ticaret ile imalat sanayi göstergeleri arasındaki iliski arastırılmıstır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TONUS, Ö. (2022). Openness and Industrialization in Turkey After Customs Union. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17, 193–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/493583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Agenor P., Üçer M. ve McDermott J. (1997). Fiscal Imbalances, Capital Flows and the Real Exchange Rate: The case of Turkey, IMF Working Paper, No: 97/1
  2. Bağımsız Sosyal Bilimciler (2006). IMF Gözetiminde On Uzun Yıl: 1998– 2008 Farklı Hükümetler Tek Siyaset, BSB 2006 Yılı Raporu, http://www.bagimsizsosyalbilimciler.org/Yazilar_BSB/ BSB2006_Final.pdf, (Erisim: 15 Haziran 2006)
  3. Bekmez S. (2002). “Sectoral Impacts of Turkish Accession to the European Union”, Eastern European Economics, 40 (2), ss. 57–84
  4. Cizre Ü. ve Yeldan E. (2005). “Turkey: Economy, Politics and Society in the Post-Crisis Era”, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 12, No: 3, ss. 387–408
  5. Dasgupta S. ve Singh A. (2006). Manufacturing, Services and Premature De- Industrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Emprical Analysis, University of Cambridge, Centre for Business Research Working Paper, No: 327 6. DPT (2006). Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı (2007–2013), DPT yayınları, Ankara
  6. Ertuğrul A. ve Selçuk F. (2001). “A Brief History of the Turkish Economy, 1990–2000”, Russian and East European Finance and Trade, Vol 10, No.37, ss. 6–28
  7. Erzan R. ve Filiztekin A. (1997). “Competitiveness of Turkish SMEs in the Customs Union”, European Economic Review, 41, ss. 881–892
  8. Harrison G., Rutherford T. ve Tarr D. (1997). “Economic implications for Turkey of a Customs Union with the European Union”. European Economic Review, Vol. 41(3–5), Elsevier, ss. 861–870. 10.Hartler C. ve Laird S. (1999). The EU Model and Turkey - A Case for Thanksgiving?, World Trade Organization: Staff Working Paper, TPRD-99- 01. 11.Karluk S. Rıdvan (2005a). Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye, 8. baskı, Beta Yayınları, Đstanbul. 12.Karluk S. Rıdvan (2005b). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Yapısal Dönüsüm, 10. baskı, Beta Yayınları, Istanbul. 13.Kaya Y. (1998). Sermaye Hareketleri ve Kısa Vadeli Sermaye Hareketlerinin Modellenmesi, Ankara: DPT Yayınları, No: 2487. 14.Mercenier J. ve Yeldan E. (1997). "On Turkey’s Trade Policy: Is a customs union with Europe enough?", European Economic Review, No. 41, ss. 871- 880. 15.Neyaptı B., Taskın F. ve Üngör M. (2003). “Has European Customs Union Agreement Really Affected Turkey's Trade?” METU International Conference in Economics IV, 06–09 September 2003, Ankara. 16.Önis Z. ve Bakır C. (2005). “Turkey’s Political Economy in the Age of Financial Globalization: The Significance of the EU Anchor”, Yayımlanmamış tebliğ, http://home.ku.edu.tr/~zonis/ONIS_BAKIR.pdf, (Erisim: 6