Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17

Çoğulcu Toplumlar ve Konsensüse Dayalı Demokrasi Teorisi: Malezya Örneği

The Plural Society and Cosociational Democracy Theory: Malaysia's Case

Pages
139–156
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lijphart’s assertions about “The Plural Society and Consociational Democracy Theory” proved to be important to understand the political, social and economic structures of some European states, but Malaysia’s case proved that there is a need to develop these assertions further, taking into account the historical, cultural and various human factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we try to examine the views and points on “The Plural Society and Consociational Democracy Theory”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we try to examine the views and points on “The Plural Society and Consociational Democracy Theory”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lijphart’s assertions about “The Plural Society and Consociational Democracy Theory” proved to be important to understand the political, social and economic structures of some European states, but Malaysia’s case proved that there is a need to develop these assertions further, taking into account the historical, cultural and various human factors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we try to examine the views and points on “The Plural Society and Consociational Democracy Theory”. Although, A. Lijphart’s assertions about “The Plural Society and Consociational Democracy Theory” proved to be important to understand the political, social and economic structures of some European states, but Malaysia’s case proved that there is a need to develop these assertions further, taking into account the historical, cultural and various human factors.

Özet

Bu çalısmada,“Çoğulcu Toplum ve Consociational (konsensüse dayalı) Demokrasi” görüslerini, Malezya örneği çerçevesinde ele alarak, bu görüslerin, Malezya için ne derece geçerli yada geçersiz olduklarını göstermeye çalıstık. Literatürde, oldukça elestirilen A. Lijphart’ın görüsleri, her ne kadar, Avrupadaki bazı ülkeler için geçerli olsada, Malezya örneğini, tarihsel, kültürel ve değisik insan özelliklerini ele almadığından dolayı, açıklamada yeterli gözükmemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sami, D. M. (2022). Çoğulcu Toplumlar ve Konsensüse Dayalı Demokrasi Teorisi: Malezya Örneği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 17, 139–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/493566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. ANDERSON W.C, VONDER MEADEN F.R. & YOUNG C., Issues of Political Development, Newjersey, 1967 2. CAMPBELL Q.E. Racial Tension and National. Identity Nashville, 1972. 3. FISK, E.K. & RANĐ OSMAN H. Political Economy of Malaysia Kuala Lumpur, 1982. 4. FUNSTOW, J. Malay Politics in Malaysia:A Study of UMNO and PAS Singapore, 1980 5. LIJPHART AREND. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Explanation, YALE University, 1977. 6. MAUZY K. D. & MĐLNE, R.S. Politics and Governments in Malaysia, Singapore, 1975. 7. MILNE S. R. & ZACHAR W.M. Conflict and Stability in Southeast Asia New York, 1974. 8. Articles and Papers 9. ALI HUSSEĐN S. “Social Relations in Malaysia: Ethnic Class Factors” January, 1982. 10.BARRY, BRĐAN. “Consociational Model and Its dangers”, European Political Research, 1975. 11.BENG CHEE TAW, “ A Cultural Assimilation and Integration: The Case of the Chinese in Malaysia” January, 1983. 12.DAALDER, HANS. “The Consociational Denocracy Theme” World Politics, 1983 13.FREEDMAN M. “The Growth of Plural Society in Malaya” Pacific Affair, 1980. 14.GIBBONS S. D. “National Integration and Cultural Diversity: The Case of Malaysia”, Development in SEA., 1971. 15.GHEE TECK L. “Malaysia: Changing Occupational Patterns,The Growth of the Worker Class and Its Implications in Social Relations” January, 1983 16.GUNGWU WANG. “Chinese Politics in Malaya”, The Chinese Quarterly 1982 17.JEYAKUMAR D. The Indian Poor in Malaysia: Problems and So1utions” January, 1983. 18.KESSLER S.C. “Islam, Society and Political Behaviour: Some Comparative Implication of The Malay Case” Comparative Politics, 1972. 19.KIEWE A. RONALD. “Pillars and Sand: A Marxist in Netherlands”. Comperative Politics, 1981 20.LIJPHART AREND “Consociational Theory, Problems and Prospects: A reply” Comparative Politics April, 1981. 21.LIJPHART AREND.” Consociational Democracy”, World Politics 1982 22.MC RAE D. K. “The Plural Society and Western Political Tradition”, Canadian Political Science Journal, December 1978. 23.MILNE S.R. “National Ideology and Nation Building in Malaysia” Asian Survey. 1983 24.MUZAFFAR C., “Has the Communal Situation in Malaysia Worsened Over the Last Decade” January, 1983 25.NAGATA A. JUDITH. “The Chinese Muslims of Malaysia: New Malays or New Associates: A Problems of Religion and Ethnicity” (n.a) 26.NAGATA A JUDITH. “A Macro View of Malaysian Society from Malaysian Mosaic.” (n.a) 27.NELS R. & WOLPE H, “Modernization and The Politics of Communalism:A Theoritical Perspec